本集简介
双语字幕
仅展示文本字幕,不包含中文音频;想边听边看,请使用 Bayt 播客 App。
五月是加入我们的会员社区The Lab的绝佳时机,我来告诉你为什么。
May is a great time to join our membership community, The Lab, and let me tell you why.
第一,我们将在5月18日启动新一轮的导师配对。
Number one, we're doing a new round of mastermind matching beginning on May 18.
我们会精心挑选六到八位业务相近的会员,帮你更进一步。
We will hand curate a group of six to eight other members with similar businesses to help push you further.
第二,这个月我们有三场特别活动:5月20日的全社区导师会,5月21日与Jay Acunzo一起学习演讲商业化的工作坊,还有5月27日专门为使用Circle的会员举办的圆桌讨论。
Number two, we have three special events this month, a community wide mastermind on May 20, a workshop to learn the business of speaking with Jay Acunzo on May 21, and a community roundtable for members using Circle on May 27.
如果你在伦敦,我们5月22日还安排了线下聚会。
If you're around London, we even have an in person meetup on May 22.
最后,也是最重要的一点,由Circle主办的The Lab线下活动将在6月8号到9号举行。
Finally, and maybe most importantly, The Lab Offline powered by Circle is happening June eighth through ninth.
现在加入The Lab还来得及,赶紧拿下你的入场券,来博伊西和我们见面。
It's not too late to join the lab and punch your ticket to join us there in Boise.
到时候会有五十个人齐聚一堂,面对面相处两天。
There'll be 50 of us hanging out in person for two days.
加入The Lab任何时候都不错,但五月尤其值得。
It's always a great time to join the lab, but May is especially great.
想了解更多并加入我们,请访问creatorscience.com/lab。
You can learn more and join us at creatorscience.com/lab.
网址是creatorscience.com/lab。
That's creatorscience.com/lab.
期待在里头见到你。
Hope to see you inside.
加洛韦总说YouTube是个点开就看的平台。
Galloway always calls YouTube a click and watch platform.
我觉得它更像是个吸引停留、抓住注意力的平台。
I think it's like a hover and hook platform.
这两位是科林和萨米尔,创作者经济领域最具影响力的一对搭档。
That is Colin and Samir, the most influential duo in the Creator Economy.
科林和萨米尔从2012年就开始一起拍视频,但你熟知并喜欢的频道,其实是从2016年这段视频开始的。
Colin and Samir started making videos together all the way back in 2012, but the channel you know and love started with this video in 2016.
过去十年里,他们积累了一百五十万订阅者,视频总播放量超过四亿四千五百万次,成为全球创作者学习顶尖经验的核心平台。
Over the last decade, they have gained one and a half million subscribers, generated over four forty five million views and created the central hub where creators of all sizes come to learn from the best in the world.
今天他们来聊聊如何打造一个经得起时间考验的频道。
They're here today to talk about how to build a channel that stands a test of time.
在这期节目中,你会了解到内容形式的重要性,以及如何建立强大的品牌。
In this episode, you'll learn the importance of formats and building a strong brand.
在当前这个以观看量为热门指标的世界里,创作者很容易迷失方向。
Creators are gonna get lost in this current world where viewership is a really exciting metric.
品牌是一个更难衡量的指标,也更难建立。
Brand is a way harder metric to track and it's also way harder to create.
这需要长期的一致性。
It requires consistency over time.
找到固定的内容形式,是实现一致性的关键。
Finding a format is the path to consistency.
如何为你的频道打下财务成功的基础?
How to set your channel up for financial success?
最重要的是,别把收入直接和你的频道绑在一起。
First and foremost, don't tie your revenue directly to your channel.
这是个特别好的案例。
Great case study.
马克·罗伯直到粉丝达到一千万时,才辞掉了全职工作。
Mark Rober didn't leave his full time job until 10,000,000 subs.
我还问过他们有没有葡萄。
And I even asked them if they've got any grapes.
多得是呢,杰伊。
So many, Jay.
一直都有。
All the time.
接下来,听听我和科林、萨米尔的对话。
And now onto my conversation with Colin and Samir.
现在,整个世界,包括创作者领域,变化的速度都太快了。
It seems like right now the pace of change in the whole world, but in the Creator space as well, is just so fast.
从你的角度出发,结合你在节目中和圈内人交流的那些经历,你现在最关注的是什么?又决定不去关注哪些事情?
To pull from your perspective, from conversations you've had on the show, offline from people who are really in this, what are you paying really close attention to, and what are you deciding not to pay close attention to?
你觉得目前整个领域正在朝哪个方向发展?你最留意的是哪一点?
What do you think the direction of forward progress is moving towards that you're really keyed into right now?
是的。
Yeah.
我觉得,不管是在刷YouTube、Instagram还是TikTok的时候,我都在留意那些能做出可复制内容、持续输出、并建立起品牌影响力的创作者。
I would say I'm I'm trying to even as I consume, YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, trying to plug into who are the creators who are making repeatable formats, are doing things consistently and creating brands.
你知道吗,三四年前,我和Samir刚开始关注这个领域的时候,到处都是热点。
You know, I think three to four years ago, as Samir and I were covering this space, there were a lot of trends.
对吧?
Right?
那时候很容易跟上一个趋势,快速传播,顺便教育大家:你应该去抓住这些趋势,这些YouTube上的最佳实践。
And it was easy to kind of, like, hop on a trend and make sure people know about it and educate people because you should be hopping on some of these trends, some of these best practices for YouTube.
但现在每天冒出的新东西实在太多了。
And I think now there is just so much coming out on a daily basis.
现在内容太多了,在我看来,未来真正重要的是:你能不能持续产出,稳定地提供价值,建立一个让人信任并愿意追随的品牌。
We are so saturated with content that the one thing that matters in my eyes now and moving forward is, are you making something consistently, delivering value consistently, and creating a brand that people can trust and latch onto?
因为我们面对的其他内容实在太多了。
Because we're just inundated with so much otherness.
各种各样的内容层出不穷。
There are so many different types of things.
每个细分领域里都有上百种变体,所以创作者必须明确自己的立场,知道自己代表什么,并坚持下去。
There are 100 variations of every type of content within a niche, and so I think it's really important for creators to sort of put a stake in the ground and understand what they stand for and try and remain consistent.
我觉得特别值得关注的一点是‘定时观看’。
The one thing that I think is really important to look at is appointment viewing.
我的意思是,虽然我们总说创作者抢走了注意力,好莱坞在衰退,但最近《黑镜:潘达斯奈基》和《白莲花度假村》这些剧,明显是让人守着时间等更新的节目。
And what I mean by that is like, what's really interesting is as much as we can say that like, oh, creators are dominating attention and Hollywood is falling behind, I actually think looking at Severance and White Lotus most recently, that's appointment television.
它们让观众从‘一口气刷完’回归到每周追更的模式,在HBO Max和Apple TV上引发了大量讨论,产生了很强的文化影响力。
And that moved back from binge model back to the week to week model on HBO Max and on Apple TV and created a lot of cultural penetration in terms of people talking about these shows.
所以,这两点是我现在最关注的。
So I think those are the two things that I'm looking at.
首先,每个人都该关注一下,在内容泛滥的时代,到底是什么抓住了我们的注意力,那些有固定播出时间的事件性内容又是如何引发广泛讨论的。
One, I think everyone should be looking at what is capturing our attention in a sea of just abundance in terms of content and how these eventized appointment viewing moments are driving a lot of cultural conversation.
另一方面,从创作的角度看,我们得想想,一个更依赖个人自主创作的世界会是什么样子。
And then the other side on the creation side, exploring what does a world of more self reliant creation look and feel like?
这种模式下,内容怎么生产?协作如何进行?当一个创作者加上大量软件工具的辅助,最终呈现给观众的作品又会是什么样?
What does that mean for how content gets produced, how collaboration happens, and what that end product looks like for audiences when it's touched by a singular creator plus the support of a lot of software.
为什么一致性这么重要?关键点在哪里?
What the important points about why should something be consistent?
什么时候,一致性会变成乏味?
When does consistent become stale?
为什么这反而是优势,而不是问题?
Why is that a feature and not a problem?
咱们聊聊世界上那些最顶尖的品牌吧。
Why don't we talk about some of the best brands in the world?
咱们三人眼中,哪些品牌算得上最具标志性的、永恒的经典?
What the three of us consider the most iconic brands in the world, timeless brands.
杰,提到品牌,你第一反应想到什么?
Jay, what do you think of when you think of brand?
比如苹果、耐克,还有奢侈品这些。
I mean, you have things like Apple, you have Nike, you have luxury goods.
别人一说品牌,我脑子里马上跳出苹果和耐克。
Apple and Nike come up for me when someone says the term brand.
耐克、苹果,这些一提就懂,对吧?
Nike, Apple, those are like immediate, right?
我很好奇,为什么偏偏是它们最先冒出来?咱们来聊聊原因。
And like, I wonder, like, let's explore why those come up.
我觉得是因为它们的象征性,还有高度的一致性。
Well, I think it's iconography, it's consistency, right?
这两个品牌,你闭上眼睛都能想象出它们的标志长什么样。
With both of those brands, you can close your eyes and you understand what the logo looks like.
你知道它们用什么颜色,什么样的视觉风格。
You understand the colors that they would use, the types of visuals.
这并不是说这些品牌就不会偏离这种风格,去做大量边缘化的尝试。
That's not to say that those brands don't stray from that and do a ton of experiments and things on the fringes.
但大多数时候,它们一直保持着一致的风格,所以我们才记得住它们。
But more often than not, they've kept to a consistent style over time so that we just remember them.
我们经常讨论哪些内容让人印象深刻,哪些转头就忘,其实这类东西太多了,对吧?
I think we talk a lot about memorable views and forgettable views, and there are so many things, right?
你刷着抖音,刷着短视频流,一天看几百个视频,到底能记住几个?
You're scrolling TikTok, you're scrolling a short form feed, you're watching hundreds of videos in a day, how many of them do you actually remember?
对吧?
Right?
你真正记住、还会分享给朋友的,是哪一个?
What's the one that you actually remember, and then share to a friend?
如果你之前看过同一个创作者的类似内容,那现在记住这个视频的概率就会高很多。
The chance that you would, remember a video, especially on a short form feed, it gets a lot higher if you've seen something similar to it from the same creator before.
所以我觉得,这就是一个基本前提。
So I think that's a baseline.
就像我们朋友杰克·科恩的《Trackstar》音乐问答节目那样。
It's just like, you know, our friend Jack Cohen with Trackstar music trivia show.
每次的格式都一模一样。
It's the same format every single time.
不只是格式一样,连开场的问题都完全相同。
Not only the same format, same question that opens it up.
同一个问题。
Same question.
你一看到耳机上那个Trackstar的标志。
You see the headphones with the Trackstar logo.
他经常穿着一件橙色夹克。
Often, he's wearing an orange jacket.
对吧?
Right?
所以我觉得,这种一致性对品牌建设特别重要,尤其是在我刷视频的时候。
So I think this is important just to build the brand when I'm scrolling.
我一看到就想着,哦,对,就是这个我爱看的节目。
I'm like, oh, hey, there's the show I like.
对吧?
Right?
还有我喜欢的创作者。
There's the creator I like.
就是Trackstar。
There's Trackstar.
我会记住他。
I'll remember him.
不过他们偶尔也会去音乐节,搞点不一样的形式,试试新花样。
But they also sometimes will go to a music festival and create slightly different formats, and they'll experiment and do slightly different things.
他们会把长视频发到YouTube上。
They'll put long form on YouTube.
但如果你连基本的稳定性都没有,别人很容易就把你忘了。
But if you don't have that base level consistency, the likelihood that someone will forget you is a lot higher.
你看看YouTube上最老牌的节目,那些坚持最久的创作者。
You zoom out at the longest standing shows on YouTube, like the longest standing creators on YouTube.
我马上想到的是Dude Perfect和Rhett和Link。
Two that come to mind are Dude Perfect and Rhett and Link.
对吧?
Right?
一提起来,第一个蹦出来的就是他们。
Like immediately, that's who comes to mind.
Dude Perfect真的很特别。
Dude Perfect, really interesting.
他们特别专注,你问他们使命是什么,我们以前聊过,他们的目标是成为娱乐领域最值得信赖的品牌。
They commit Like when you ask them what their mission statement is, when we've talked to them about it before, it's to be the most trusted brand in entertainment.
我觉得这个使命非常有分量。
And I think that is a really impactful mission.
你看Rhett和Link,他们做《Good Mythical Morning》都多久了?
Look at Rhett and Link, they've been doing Good Mythical Morning for what?
十多年了。
Over a decade.
对吧?
Right?
而且他们从不掉链子。
And they don't miss.
你觉得一个品牌的公式是什么?
I think when you think about, like, what is the equation for a brand?
就是长期保持稳定。
It's consistency over time.
这种稳定关乎质量、价值观、使命宣言,还涉及很多其他方面。
And consistency has to do with quality, it has to do with values, it has to do with the mission statement, has to do a lot of things.
但关键就在于长期坚持。
But it's that over time.
而正是这一点,为你打开了整个世界。
And that unlocks the world for you.
这种持续性能为你打开整个世界。
That level of consistency unlocks the world for you.
所以,作为创作者,要真正做到持续性其实非常难。
And so when you back up, consistency as a creative is really hard to get to.
找到一个固定的模式,才是通往持续性的路径。
And finding a format is the path to consistency.
在今天这个可以无限刷内容的互联网时代,打造品牌就是这么一回事。
And so that is the world of building a brand on the internet today when you can watch just an unlimited amount of content today.
我们谈的是记忆点。
We're talking about recall.
你有没有过这样的经历:放下手机,突然想起那个视频?
We're talking about, like, do you step away from your phone and go, I remember that video.
那个视频真不错。
That was a good video.
那段时间花得值。
That was time well spent.
再回到耐克和苹果,我们对耐克的记忆,就是那个勾形标志、‘Just Do It’,还有它的整体视觉风格,就是这样子的。
And when we're talking about to bring this all the way back to Nike and Apple, it's like our recall of Nike, the check mark, just do it, the iconography of it is is like that.
而且很大程度上,是因为它们有一套清晰的价值观。
And a a lot of it is also because they have a set of values.
我们闭上眼睛,就能想象出一个耐克的广告,这真的很重要。
We can, like, close our eyes and imagine a Nike campaign, And that's really important.
闭上眼睛,想象一下苹果的广告。
Close our eyes and imagine an Apple campaign.
它们可以大胆尝试。
And they can experiment.
苹果推出Apple Vision Pro,就算表现不佳也没关系。
Apple can launch the Apple Vision Pro and it can not go well.
耐克也可以试几种不同的方向,就算不成功也没关系。
And Nike can try a few different things and they can not go well.
但品牌的主题一致性,根植于Air Jordan或Dunks这些产品长期保持的稳定风格。
But the thematic kind of consistency of the brand is rooted in the consistency over time of Air Jordans or the Dunks.
那就是他们的核心,是他们一贯的模式。
That's their engine, that's their consistent format.
然后他们可以在这个基础上做各种尝试。
And then they can have experimentation around that.
但你必须有这个核心,才能让人知道你是谁、代表什么、长期坚持什么。
But you have to have that engine so that people know who you are, what you stand for, what it is over time.
我觉得在当前这个观众数量成为热门指标的世界里,很多创作者会迷失方向。
I think a lot of creators are gonna get lost in this current world where viewership is a really exciting metric.
品牌是一个更难衡量的指标,也更难建立。
Brand is a way harder metric to track, and it's also way harder to create.
这需要长期的一致性。
It requires consistency over time.
这让我想到了几件事。
This brings to mind a couple of things for me.
第一,你们看过《幸存者》吗?
One, did you guys watch Survivor?
我没看过。
I didn't.
我看过几季。
I've seen some seasons of it.
我有个朋友参加了《幸存者:加蓬》那季。
One of my friends was on Gabon, Survivor Gabon.
所以我看了几集。
So I watched a couple episodes of that.
我觉得《幸存者》是电视史上最好的节目之一。
Survivor, I think is one of the greatest television shows ever made.
我直到疫情时才开始看,那时候只是想找点东西打发时间。
I didn't get into it until the pandemic and I just needed something to fill at the time.
它的节目模式太稳定了,随便看到哪一集,我都能大概猜到杰夫接下来会对主持人说什么。
But that is extremely consistent in format to the point where at any point in the episode, I have a pretty good chance of knowing what Jeff is going to say to the host.
然后他就说:‘现在开始读票。’
It's like, all right, I'll read the votes.
就像你知道反派什么时候会出现,确实有一套固定的套路。
Like where the villain is gonna come in or where the, yeah, there's a formula to it.
但他们也会在框架内做一些尝试。
And they experiment within that.
现在都播到第48季了。
But I mean, it's survivor 48 right now.
已经做了24年了,每年两季。
Been doing this for twenty four years, two seasons a year.
这本身就很能说明问题。
So there's something to be said about that.
我所说的这种模式,从第一季就开始了。
And this format I'm talking about goes back to season one.
真不可思议,他们当初居然一下就找对了,而且一直没改。
It's crazy how much they got right and just stuck with.
问题是,他们是不是真的找对了,才一直坚持下来的?
And the question is, do they get it right and stick with it?
还是说,正因为他们一直坚持,才对了呢?
Or is it right because they stuck with it?
差不多吧。
Sort of.
这让我想起以前和宝洁公司的一位高管聊过,我们谈到品牌,因为宝洁旗下有
This also brings to mind, had a conversation with an executive from Procter and Gamble one time, and we were talking about brand because Procter and Gamble has
对。
Yeah.
佳洁士,什么都有,对吧?
Crest, it has everything, right?
他说品牌的本质就是把某个东西——我记不清原话了——
And he said the point of brand is to take, I forget the exact word it's.
他好像是说,把原本的一级考量变成二级考量。
I think he said a second order consideration or a first order consideration and make it a second order consideration.
简单说,一个强大的品牌,就是让你不用太费劲去思考,也不用老做产品对比。
Basically, you're saying like a great brand means that you don't have to think that much or do product comparisons.
你完全信任这个品牌,所以根本不用多想,自然而然就选它了。
You just trust the brand itself so much that you go with that option unconsciously.
我觉得这正跟你提到的回忆和信任有关——当你打开这个节目时,你知道自己会得到什么。
And I think that's kind of what you're speaking to with this recall and trust, a brand that we know we're gonna get when we tune into it.
而你之所以打开它,正是因为清楚自己会看到什么。
And we tune into it because we know what we're gonna get.
对。
Mhmm.
作为创意工作者,这可能挺难的。
That that can be hard as a creative individual.
对吧?
Right?
比如像肖恩·埃文斯这样,已经做了十多年《Hot Ones》的人。
Like, again, like, someone like a Sean Evans who's been doing Hot Ones for over a decade as well.
这种固定形式,其实是给创作者提供了一个绝佳的框架,让他们能不断发挥创意。
Formats are these, like, unbelievable containers for creatives to build something.
但当你作为一名创意工作者走过十多年,你自己也在不断变化。
But then also you are over a decade as you go through your own changes as a creative person.
如果这个形式成功了,那很可能就是你未来余下创意生涯,或其中某个阶段要一直做的事。
If it's successful, that's the thing you're gonna be doing for the remainder of maybe your creative career or some iteration of it.
所以我觉得,在设计形式时,千万别只看短期,得好好问问自己:这真的是我能长期做的吗?
And so I think it is very important to not look on such a short term window when you're building formats, to actually ask yourself the question is like, Is this something I could do?
我们最先问创作者的问题是:你能连续五十二周每周都制作这个形式吗?
The first thing we ask creators is like, Can you produce this format for fifty two weeks?
我觉得这一点特别关键。
I think that's really important.
你能保证接下来五十二周,每周都做这个吗?
Could you do this every week for the next fifty two weeks?
一年时间,你能持续做出这个形式吗?
One year, can you make this format?
再往远了看,如果这个形式真的火了,你能用它支撑你整个创意生涯吗?
And the next question as you zoom out, it's like, if this is the thing that hits, can you do this for the rest of your creative career?
在你开发内容形式、探索跨平台方向时,这个问题特别值得深思:你到底想做些什么。
And it's an interesting question to ask yourself as you're developing formats and exploring, what what you wanna do across platforms.
敬请期待。
Stick around.
马上回来。
We'll be right back.
如果你经常跟客户打交道,却厌倦了别人总说增长只能靠招人或者用AI,那你一定要听听《不招聘也能增长》这个播客,是我朋友肯·亚米什做的。
If you work with clients and you're tired of hearing that the only way to grow is to hire people or work with AI, you should check out Grow Without Hiring, a podcast by my good friend, Ken Yarmish.
肯作为个体经营者,靠自己把服务业务做到了每年500万美元。他是通过一系列系统性的微调实现的,比如主动争取六位数的单子,而不是五位数的——这些内容他都专门做过一期。
Ken bootstrapped his professional services business to $5,000,000 per year as a solopreneur, And he did it by systematically making small changes, like pitching 6 figure deals instead of 5 figure deals, something he has an episode about.
我从肯身上学到了很多,他也合作过不少知名人士。
I've learned a lot from Ken, and he's worked with some big names.
像马特·巴克、徐娜欣和劳拉·阿科斯塔这些人都信任肯,让他帮自己优化服务内容,用系统推动业务扩张。
People like Matt Barker, Nausheen Chen, and Laura Acosta trust Ken to sharpen their offers and scale their businesses with systems.
这个播客里,就藏着他的完整方法论。
In this podcast is his playbook.
每一集都很短,实用性强,就像我的语音备忘录系列,肯会拆解真实自由职业者是如何打造自己的生意的。
Every episode is short and tactical like my voice memo episodes where Ken breaks down how real solo operators engineer their businesses.
销售、交付、产品设计、系统搭建,全都在一个正在分化成赢家和其余人的市场里。
The sales, the delivery, the offers, the systems, all in a market that's splitting between big winners and everyone else.
这个节目特别容易一口气听完。
The show is easy to binge.
听了一集,你就忍不住把整个系列都刷完了。
You listen to one episode and find yourself sweeping through the whole catalog.
我建议你先听叫《算法免疫营销》的那一集,然后点关注,新内容出来会自动推送。
I recommend starting with the episode titled algorithm proof marketing, then hit follow new ones land automatically.
在你常用的播客应用里搜索‘Grow Without Hiring’,或者直接访问 gwh.fm。
Search for grow without hiring in your favorite podcast app or go to gwh.fm.
就是 growwithouthiring,gwh.fm。
That's growwithouthiring, gwh.fm.
接下来,进入我和科林、萨米尔的对话。
And now on to my conversation with Colin and Samir.
那这和Colin和Samir的品牌,或者说是出版品牌有什么关系呢?
So how does this play into the Colin and Samir brand or the the published brand?
你们是怎么考虑节目形式和稳定性的?
How are you thinking about formats, consistency?
目前这些思考正在怎样引导着你们的方向?
How is how is this consideration leading your thinking right now?
对我来说,Colin和Samir这个节目最初是2018年从音频开始的。
I mean, I would I would say for us, when it comes to the Colin and Samir Show, that's something that started out on audio in 2018.
那时候我们的播客根本没有视频。
So there was no video to our podcast.
就是我和Samir坐在一起,聊一聊走创意这条路是什么感觉,怎么才能真正做成这件事。
It was just Samir and I talking with each other about what it's like to try and embark on this creative career, to try and make it work.
直到2020年、2021年我们开始做视频,才第一次能够每周稳定地为创作者提供同样的价值。
And the moment we took it to video in 2020, 2021, that's when, for the first time, we were able to deliver the same value to creators consistently every single week.
那时候我们才意识到,原来我们已经拥有了一套可以每周持续运作的模式和流程。
That was the first time we realized that we had a format and a process that would let us do that every week.
所以说到今天,我们的业务变得更加多元了。
And so flash forward to today, our business is more multifaceted.
我们还有像Publish这样的通讯、Creator Startup,以及我们的教育产品。
We do have things like Publish, the newsletter, Creator Startup, our education.
如果你回头看看去年,我们其实并没有在一年52周里每周都发布一期视频。
And when you actually look back at last year, we're not putting out an episode and video on YouTube fifty two weeks out of the year.
对吧?
Right?
所以即使在今年,我们也在重新审视《Colin and Samir Show》和我们的访谈内容——这些才是我们的核心动力,思考如何调整才能更接近那个目标。
So even now, this year, we're looking at the Colin and Samir Show and our interviews, which are our engine, and thinking, what changes can we make to actually get closer to that if we had to?
我们还在不断拆解后期制作流程,仔细分析,然后发现,其实……
We're still, like, dissecting and looking at our post production and breaking it down and realizing that, oh, you know what?
我们一直说,你应该能做出52期这样的内容。
We actually, we say you should be able to make 52 of these.
但以我们现在的业务规模,我其实不确定我们能不能做到。
With our current business, I actually don't know if we can.
所以我们还在不断审视,觉得必须做出一些调整,才能真正达到那个目标,保持品牌的一致性。
And so we're still looking at it, and going, All right, we need to make some changes, make some adjustments to try and get there, so that we can remain consistent as a brand.
我们可以保留这个核心——节目本身,它每周都能为我们传递价值,同时也能留出空间和时间去尝试新东西,我觉得这对创作者来说特别重要,你得有试错的余地。
We can have that engine, which is the show, which helps us deliver value every week, and then we can breathe a little bit and have time and space to experiment, which I think is really important just as a creative person, you need to be able to experiment.
但这对品牌的发展同样关键,也让观众知道,这两个人并没有躺平,不是为了完成任务才每周硬凑一集。
But it's also important for the evolution of your brand, and for your audience to know these guys have not gotten complacent, and are just putting out an episode every week because they have to, right?
而是因为他们一直在突破自我,不断进化,故事也在持续更新,而我恰恰想跟着这种变化走。
Or it's because it's the box that they've put themselves into, they're still evolving and pushing and their story is changing, and I can follow that.
我觉得这也是为什么那些衍生产品,比如《Publish》这么重要,对吧?
I think also that's where the ancillary products, the published press comes into play, right?
自从《Publish》上线以来,如果我没记错的话,我们从来没错过过一次Ascend的更新。
Since that has launched, correct me if I'm wrong, but we have not missed Ascend.
一次都没有。
Never.
一次都没错过。
Never.
我们从未错过过Ascend。
We've never missed Ascend.
如果Beehive出现技术问题,我们最多晚一个小时。
Maybe we've been an hour late if there was a technical difficulty with Beehive.
但发Ascend这一天,我们从来没断过。
But we've never missed a day to send that.
像这样设计出能长期保持高度稳定的模式,我觉得特别重要。
And creating formats like that where you can be really consistent over long periods of time, I think is super important.
但也不能把每周三篇新闻稿全压在自己身上。
But also not pouring The published press, three news stories a week.
我们有专门的写手帮我们处理这些内容。
We have writers who help us with that.
我们还有编辑负责把关。
We have an editor.
通过这套流程,我们能确保它持续稳定地输出。
We're able to operationalize that to ensure that's a consistent product.
就我跟科林来说,哪怕在《科林与萨米尔》每一集里,内容也有些不同。
Think when it comes to me and Colin, even within each episode of the Colin and Samir show, there's a bit of variation.
不变的是,始终是我和科林,聊的是创作者经济这个领域。
The consistency is it's me and Colin, and we're gonna be talking about the world of the creator economy.
我们会谈互联网上的创意。
We're gonna talk about creativity on the internet.
也会聊数字娱乐。
We're gonna talk about digital entertainment.
有时候会请嘉宾来聊。
Sometimes it's gonna be with the guests.
有时候就我们俩自己聊。
Sometimes it's gonna be with us.
但每种形式之间其实差别挺大的。
But there's actually quite a bit of variation amongst each format.
每一集并不是那种特别死板的套路。
It's not super formulaic episode to episode.
有出版媒体这个引擎,再加上这样的通讯,确实帮我们保持了稳定性。
Having that engine of the published press and having a newsletter like that, that does allow us to stay consistent.
已经好几年了,我们每周发三篇,从没落下过。
It's been years now and we send three a week and we just don't miss.
是的,你们当然有那些访谈内容。
Yeah, obviously you guys have the interviews.
你们也有一些个人视频,就在我们俩聊之前,我重新看了你们那期关于‘YouTube正在变化’的视频。
You have some of your solo videos, it's Before just the two of you this conversation, I rewatched the, the video you guys had about, YouTube is changing.
没错。
Yeah.
我特别喜欢那一期。
I really love that episode.
我是说,我基本都看了你们的每一期。
I mean, I I watch most of your episodes.
我真的很喜欢你们的节目。
I love your episodes.
我也特别喜欢你们做的那种纪录片风格的内容。
I also really love the documentary style stuff you guys do.
我知道你们一直对纪录片风格有深厚的感情和积累。
And I know, like, you have this history and passion with documentary style stuff.
我猜拍这样的片子得花不少功夫。
I imagine it's a pretty big lift to do one of those things.
这种风格在现在的科林·萨米尔品牌里占什么位置?
Where does that live in the current Colin Samir brand?
你们有没有考虑把它做成一个常驻的系列?
Are you thinking about that as a more repeat format?
我觉得你们有
I think you have
在商业化自己真正热爱的东西时,必须格外谨慎。
to be so unbelievably careful to commercialize the thing you love doing.
真的得非常非常小心才行。
I think you have to be really, really careful with that.
那种发自内心热爱的东西。
The thing that's like a deep love and passion.
我问过很多创作者:你的梦想项目是什么?
I've talked to a lot of creatives of like, What's your dream project?
他们就会给我讲一个梦想项目。
And they'll like, Pitch me a dream project.
梅格,太棒了。
Meg, Amazing.
把这个放这边。
Put that one over here.
那你觉得对你来说,什么样的项目才算是有战略意义的?
Now, what do we think is a good strategic project for you?
我们就做这个吧。
Let's do that one.
其实有很多方式可以打造一个属于你的内容框架和模式,让这个引擎持续运转。
There's a lot of ways to develop a format and a container for yourself to do this engine.
对吧?
Right?
再说,我们说的其实是,你能长期坚持做这件事吗?
And again, what we're talking about of like, hey, can you do this for a long period of time?
对我们来说,纪录片就是那种发自内心的热爱。
Docs for us, I think, are deep passion.
我们一想到这个就特别兴奋。
We get really excited.
拍纪录片真的难到不可思议。
They are so unbelievably hard to make.
要耗费大量的精力,尤其是脑力上的投入。
They take a lot of bandwidth, a lot of mental bandwidth.
我们本来就是做电影的,自然想亲自参与每一个环节。
As guys who, you know, got into this as filmmakers, like, we want our hands to be all over those.
所以这种项目根本没法规模化。
So they're not scalable.
对我们来说,这根本没法规模化。
It's not a scalable format for us.
所以从商业角度看,你退一步想,我们能做纪录片导演吗?
So from a business perspective, you zoom out and you're like, could we become documentary filmmakers?
也许吧。
Maybe.
这个行当要难得多。
That business is is a lot harder.
如果纪录片制作成了我的主要收入来源,我可能会对拍纪录片产生负面情绪。
And I think if it became my source of income and my source of revenue, I might have a not great relationship with doc filmmaking.
所以当我们拍这些片子的时候,
So Yeah, when we do those,
我们一般不请太多帮手。
we don't bring on much help.
通常就是萨米尔和我,再加一个人,过去我们都是这么做的。
It's generally like Samir and I and one other historically that we've done these projects.
这些事和我们的身份绑得太紧了,公司里每个人都很痛苦。
And they are so wrapped up in our identity that it is painful for everyone in the company.
对我们来说也很痛苦。
And it's painful for us.
我不确定怎么把这变成一门生意。
I am not sure how to make that a business.
你是个作家。
You're a writer.
对吧,杰?
Right, Jay?
你是想写本书吗?
Like, you wanna write a book?
这个问题问起来真不容易。
I mean, that is a tough question to ask.
要是我们真要深究身份这类问题,比如你是不是个作家?
Like, if you if we get into, like, identity questions, like, are you a writer?
你是创作者吗?
Are you a creator?
你是YouTube博主吗?
Are you a YouTuber?
天哪,真是这样。
It's like, oh my gosh.
不是。
No.
但你说你想写
But saying you wanna write
一本书。
a book.
对吧?
Right?
那当然了。
More For sure.
是的。
Yes.
你想写本书。
You wanna write a book.
所以我觉得这跟杰伊的情况很像,你为什么不干脆多写几本书呢?
So it'd be I think it's very similar of like, well, Jay, why don't you just write a ton of books?
我真的不明白。
You know, I don't get it.
如果这真是你想要的,那为什么不直接多写几本呢?
Why don't you if if that's the thing, like, why don't you just write a bunch of books?
对。
Yeah.
没错。
Yeah.
我对拍电影也是这么想的。
That's how I feel about filmmaking.
是的。
Yeah.
天哪。
Oh, man.
好吧。
Okay.
我特别能理解,因为确实有一类项目,你对它们敬重到甚至只是动手去做,都感觉像是在威胁你和它之间的关系,更别说外界的评价了。
That resonates with me strongly because there there is like a certain class of projects that you hold in such high regard that even just doing it is kind of a threat to your relationship to the thing, let alone like external feedback or whatever.
光是动手试试,看看自己到底有没有这个本事,这件事本身对心理就是巨大的冒险。
Like just doing it and seeing, do I even have the stuff to do that actually is such a risky thing for your psyche.
现在我完全明白你的意思了。
So now I totally understand where you're coming from.
咱们聊聊YouTube在你的事业中扮演什么角色,以及你觉得对于刚起步的创作者来说,YouTube该怎样定位才合适。
Let's talk about where YouTube lives in your business and how you think YouTube should kind of live in the business of creators getting started today.
因为我觉得很多刚起步的创作者,一上来就把YouTube当成了整个事业。
Because I think a lot of creators who are getting started on YouTube, YouTube is the business.
它就是一切。
It is everything.
你们已经拓展到了频道之外,甚至超越了播客。
You guys have expanded beyond the channel, beyond the podcast.
我们之前聊过 Publish 这个项目。
We talked about Publish already.
你还提到了 Creator Startup。
You mentioned Creator Startup.
跟我聊聊创作者事业和内容的多元布局吧,你觉得未来该往哪个方向发展,新入行的人该关注些什么。
So talk to me about the portfolio of a creator's business and content and where you think that is headed or where people should be looking as they're moving forward.
我们说的是刚起步的创作者,就是刚在 YouTube 上开账号的那种,还是说已经深入到某个阶段了?
And we're talking about like an upstart creator, like someone who just started out on YouTube, or are we talking about how deep into the journey?
我觉得两种情况都可以聊聊。
I think we could talk about both.
既然你注意到新手和老手之间有区别,那我们就分别说说这两种情况。
Given that you see that there's a difference between an upstart versus somebody who's been doing it for a while, let's talk about both cases.
我认为最重要、但我们当初没做到的一点是:刚开始做YouTube频道时,别把收入跟它绑在一起。
I think the first and most important thing to do that we did not do is to not tie your income to YouTube when you start a YouTube channel.
对听的人来说,这听起来可能显而易见,但对我们来说不是,而我们恰恰就这么做了。
That might sound unbelievably obvious to people listening, but it wasn't obvious to us, and it's something that we did.
如果你去看一下Colin和Samir这个频道的数据图。
And if you look at There's this graph, the Colin and Samir YouTube channel.
你只要打开我们的总收入或任何仪表盘,看看前五年,基本就是一条平线。
And if you just go to our lifetime revenue or lifetime whatever dashboard, and you look at the first five years, it's essentially like a flat line.
那是因为我们刚起步时,做Colin和Samir频道纯粹是玩得开心,拍视频不为别的,但根本没人看。
And a lot of that is because when we first started out on YouTube, we started experimenting with the Colin and Samir channel, having a lot of fun making videos, but people weren't really watching them.
一旦经济压力来了,你就不得不做出完全不同的选择,开始找能赚钱的项目,接一些在YouTube上可能适合你的商业合作。
And then once financial pressure hits, you start having to make decisions that are very different and starting to find projects that'll pay you and starting to take deals that might work for you on YouTube.
所以当有人问我,现在做YouTube频道是不是太饱和了?
And so when people ask me like, hey, do you think it's too saturated right now to start a YouTube channel?
我还能在YouTube上取得成功吗?
Could I find success on YouTube?
我的回答总是先问:你对拍视频本身是什么态度?
My response is always like, first, what's your relationship to making videos?
你享受拍视频的过程吗?
Do you enjoy the process of making videos?
其次,你有三到五年的时间吗?
And two, do you have three to five years?
这听起来可能有点严厉,但我真心觉得,要想真正把这事做好,建立起一个有分量的品牌,大概就得花三到五年时间摸索出来。
And that might sound really aggressive, but I truly believe that actually getting good at it to make it a substantial thing that's building a real brand probably takes three to five years to figure out.
当然也有例外情况。
And we have outlier cases.
比如有个叫伊拉克的,一年就做到了。
We have Iraq who did it in a year.
零星有几个这样的案例,但我认为,要真正做起来一个频道,基本就得有这个时间投入。
We have a couple of cases here and there, but I really think that that's what it takes to build a channel.
所以最重要的一点是,别把收入直接跟你的频道绑在一起。
So first and foremost, don't tie your revenue directly to your channel.
展开剩余字幕(还有 480 条)
这是个很好的案例。
Great case study.
马克·罗伯在拥有一千多万订阅者之前,一直没辞掉全职工作。
Mark Rober didn't leave his full time job until he had 10,000,000 subs.
你不用这么极端,但刚开始时可以想想这一点。
Don't have to get that aggressive, but just think about that as you start.
等你真正进入这个领域,你会发现主要分成两类商业模式:企业对企业广告,和直接面向消费者的付费模式。
Then as you as you get into the business, I would say you're split up in the world of you're in business to business advertising, and you're in direct to consumer payments.
作为创作者,你所能选择的就这两条路。
Those are the two sides of what you could do as a creator.
企业对企业广告又可以细分为两种。
Business to business advertising is split into two.
一种是AdSense。
One is AdSense.
当你加入YouTube创作者计划后,YouTube会给你发一笔收益,这笔钱真的很诱人。
That's the check that YouTube's gonna gonna cut you as you become a part of the partner program, and that check is magical.
它就会自动到账。
It just shows up.
你只要根据自己的领域持续拍视频就行。
You just make videos depending on your niche.
比如说你做的是信用卡相关的领域。
Let's say you're in the credit card niche.
那你的千次播放收益可能会更高。
Maybe you have a higher CPM.
你如果不在娱乐领域的话。
Maybe you're not in the entertainment niche.
那你的千次播放收益就会低一些。
You have a lower CPM.
但不管怎样,这笔钱都会准时到账。
But no matter what, that check is gonna show up.
我们早期最重要的一件事,就是完全不把AdSense的收入算进预算里。
The most important thing that we did early on was we left that AdSense check off of any of our budgeting.
我们从没拿这笔收入做预测,也没根据它来招人。
No projected revenue against that, no hiring against that number.
我们对这笔钱特别谨慎,因为你对它几乎没什么掌控力。
We were just really cautious with that because you have very minimal control over it.
这个数字很神奇,但同时也小得不可思议。
And that number was magic, but it was also magically small.
持续了很长一段时间。
For a very long period of time.
所以一开始,根本没必要把它算进预算里。
So in the beginning, didn't even make sense to budget it in.
但随着它慢慢增长,每年成倍地往上走,我们还是把它排除在预算之外,毕竟我们真控制不了它。
But as it started to creep up and kind of grow exponentially year over year, we still keep it out of the budgeting because we don't really control that.
直到今年也是,我们知道明天可能因为市场变化、各种因素,这笔钱就没了,或者变得完全不一样。
Even to this year, because we know that tomorrow, on market factors, based on all types of different things, very possible that that check goes away or just looks really different.
第二种方式是通过直接的品牌合作,也就是品牌广告。
The second way is through direct brand relationships, through brand deals.
我记得有个数据说,高达92%的创作者主要靠品牌合作赚钱。
I think there's a stat that's like 92% of creators make the majority of their income through brand deals.
这会是你最主要的收入来源。
That is going to be your bread and butter.
要想做好品牌合作,你得先退一步,搞清楚自己频道的几个关键点。
And in order to be effective at brand deals, you have to take a step back and understand a few things about your channel.
首先是,你的观众是谁?
The first is who is the audience?
你到底在跟谁说话?
Who are you talking to?
接下来,你为这些观众提供了什么价值?
The next is what is the value proposition to that audience?
然后你要想清楚,你有没有一种稳定的方式,持续把这些价值传递给观众?
Then you need to understand, do I have a consistent way of delivering that value to that audience?
等这些都想明白了,再考虑品牌合作的事。
Then you can start thinking about brand deals.
我们有一个叫Creator Startup Pro的教育项目,会手把手教你为自己的品牌和YouTube频道打造一份推广方案。
We have an educational program called Creator Startup Pro, where we essentially walk you through building a pitch deck for brand deals for your business and for your YouTube channel.
这份方案就是我们当初刚开始接品牌合作时用的原版。
It's the exact pitch deck we used when we started selling brand deals.
我觉得这个过程特别重要,因为它让你意识到,你做的不只是吸引观看量。
And I think it's a really important exercise to recognize, you're not just in the business of viewership.
这其实跟我们一开始聊的话题是一脉相承的。
It goes back to what we talked about in the beginning of this episode.
你真正做的,是打造一个品牌。
You're in the business of building a brand.
你得再清楚一点,你的观众到底是谁?
And you have to understand, again, who is that audience?
他们为什么愿意看你的内容?
Why are they watching?
你能不能持续稳定地提供他们想要的东西?
Can you deliver that on a regular basis?
那别人能从你这儿买什么样的广告产品,真正融入到内容里呢?
And then what is the ad product that someone can buy from you to actually integrate into that?
这部分收入将会是你最主要的来源。
That's gonna be the lion's share of your revenue.
等你开始收到越来越多的品牌主动联系,比如邮件说‘我们想赞助你的节目’。
Once you get into the point of regular inbound brand requests, like you're getting emails of, Hey, we wanna sponsor your show.
想在你的频道做多期联合赞助。
We wanna do a multi video sponsorship on your channel.
那时候你就会意识到,这真有可能变成一门正经生意。
Then you're getting to the point where you're like, Okay, this could be a real thing.
另外一种变现方式,是直接面向消费者的模式。
Now, the other side of monetization is the direct to consumer side.
比如说,你有自己的周边商品。
That's gonna be, let's say you have merchandise.
你可以把YouTube当成获客渠道,本质上你是个直接面向消费者的电商生意。
So you could be a e commerce business that wants to use YouTube as lead gen and go, Actually, we're direct to consumer.
所以我们收入主要来自人们购买我们的产品。
So our monetization comes from people buying our product.
可能是数字产品。
Could be a digital product.
我们有课程。
We have courses.
你也有课程。
You have courses.
有人在卖Notion模板。
People sell Notion templates.
你可以卖类似这样的数字产品。
You could sell a digital product like that.
或者可以是会员制、订阅平台,像你这样的,或者Patreon这类模式。
Or it can be a membership, a subscription platform, something like you have as well, or a Patreon or something like that.
这是一种不同的盈利模式。
And that's a different monetization model.
科迪·科和诺埃尔·米勒刚在YouTube上起步的时候,还在Fullscreen公司全职上班。
Cody Ko and Noel Miller, when they started on YouTube, they were working full time jobs at full screen.
他们搞了个计划,说一旦赞助人数达到两千,诺埃尔就辞职,专心做内容创作。
They made this kind of campaign around, like, once they got to 2,000 patrons, Noel would quit his job and go full time as a creator.
他们真的做到了。
They did that.
那个Patreon后来发展得特别大。
That Patreon ended up growing really big.
这就是我觉得关于变现方式的全景图,也是你探索自己道路时可以参考的框架。
So that's kind of the pie chart that I would say of, like, monetization and how to explore your own journey.
一般来说,第一步通常是AdSense,如果你是YouTube创作者,这很可能是你最先拿到的收入。
I would say the classic steps are, like, AdSense is probably gonna be one of your first checks if you're a YouTube creator.
第二步,也是最主要的一块,是品牌合作。
Your second and the most substantial is gonna be brand deals.
再往后,如果你愿意,就会开始思考怎么直接跟观众建立更紧密的联系。
And then as you go further, you're gonna explore how to engage with your audience on a direct level if you want to do that.
这真有意思。
It's so interesting.
跟我自己的经历完全相反。
It's so counter to my story.
我刚进入视频领域时,看到的完全是这条标准路径。
As I entered the world of video, that is absolutely the typical path that I see.
但我以前主要搞写作和邮件,品牌合作对我来说简直像天方夜谭——什么?
But coming from, like, the world of, mostly writing, email, brand deals are like this thing that people turn their head like, what?
我还能在邮件里放广告赞助?
I could add sponsors to my emails?
他们直接跟观众做推广,完全不绕弯子。
And they're doing like fully direct to audience sort of offers.
特别有意思的是,最自然的做法其实是两者都做。
And it's so interesting because like the obvious answer is you do both.
关键是找到最适合你的平衡点,能做到多少就做多少。
And you you do like the ideal mix to the the degree that you can.
在深入这个话题之前,我想听听你对品牌合作和AdSense未来走向的看法。
Before I kinda go down that pathway, I'm curious to hear where you think that is going in terms of brand deals and even AdSense as time passes.
这两个领域的蛋糕在变大吗?
Is the pie growing there?
从这两方面赚钱是越来越容易了,还是越来越难了?
Is it getting easier to get money from those two areas, or is it getting smaller?
我觉得品牌合作这块的市场在扩大。
I think the brand deal pie is getting bigger.
目前品牌还在把预算逐步转向创作者领域。
I think we're still at a point where brands are shifting dollars to the world of creators.
不过这里关键的问题是长视频和短视频的区分。
Now, I think the important conversation there is long form versus short form.
短期内,更多品牌预算可能会流向短视频。
I think the reality is there's probably in the short term, more brand dollars that shift into short form.
这是因为品牌可以把短视频内容直接当作付费广告来投放。
And a lot of that is because brands can run short form content as paid media.
它在所有平台上都适用。
It works across every platform.
品牌可以以多种方式使用这些素材。
They can use the asset in multiple different ways.
当品牌找创作者制作短视频内容时,六十秒里,品牌信息的占比远高于软性植入。
And when a brand comes to a creator to make a short form piece of content, out of the sixty seconds of content, a lot more from a percentage basis is the brand's messaging than integration.
虽然深度植入的长视频形式可能会持续很久,但你看联合利华刚聘了一位37岁的新CEO,他打算把很大一部分预算转向创作者营销。
And so while the long form integration, I think, will be around for a long time, as you start to see Unilever just hired a new CEO who's 37 years old and wants to shift a large portion of their budget to creator marketing.
这种趋势肯定会体现在短视频内容上。
I think that's gonna show up in short form content.
所以我觉得品牌预算正在往这个方向转移。
So I think that's where the brand dollars are moving.
我觉得AdSense还会继续增长。
I think AdSense will continue to increase.
YouTube是联网电视上观看量最高的应用,而传统电视广告市场规模超过1600亿美元,这部分预算很可能会一点一点地转向YouTube,延续它一直以来的趋势。
YouTube is the most watched app on connected TVs, like the television advertising business, the linear TV advertising business, which is 160,000,000,000 plus dollars, that probably will start to move small, in small chunks over to the YouTube world and continue on that path that it's been on for a while.
不过我觉得,短平快的品牌合作,观众的投入度通常更低。
I do believe though with short form brand deals, you have a less engaged viewer.
也不是绝对,但确实更可能遇到注意力不集中的观众。
Not always, but I think you're more likely to have a less engaged viewer.
长视频里当然也可能有不专心的观众,但如果你把握得好,长视频的植入效果要强得多。
It doesn't mean you can't have a less engaged viewer in a long form video, but I think if you hit it right, a long form integration is way more impactful.
对吧?
Right?
因为这时候观众其实是默许了你的内容。
Because you have a viewer who almost has given you permission.
你已经把他们吸引到视频的后半段了。
You've made it so far into the video.
如果植入得当,真正提升了内容体验,观众记住它的可能性也会更大。
And if you do the integration right, and it actually elevates the messaging and the experience for the audience, the likelihood that it, again, will be memorable and not forgettable is higher.
是的,我觉得播客不一样,它不是自助式的,但我的收听和消费习惯确实受到了影响。
Yeah, I find podcast This is not self-service, but I find my own consumption habits and purchasing habits.
我特别容易被播客广告影响。
I am very influenced by podcast ads.
这可能跟我年纪或者我接触的媒介有关。
And maybe that's just because of my age or the medium that I'm in.
我们之前跟蒂姆·费里斯做节目时也聊过这个。
But we talked about this with Tim Ferriss when he was on.
只要蒂姆·费里斯念广告,我十有八九就会下单。
Tim Ferriss reading an ad was a high likelihood that I was gonna buy.
所以我觉得,最好的营销其实就是口碑传播。
And so I think that comes down to the best marketing is word-of-mouth.
对吧?
Right?
没有什么比朋友推荐更管用了。
There's no better marketing than your friend telling you about something.
正因如此,我才去琢磨:口碑传播的规模化版本在哪?答案就在播客和长对话里。
And because of that, you explore where is the scaled version of word-of-mouth and podcasting and long form conversation.
这就是那种口碑传播的规模化版本。
That's the scaled version of that.
我也觉得品牌合作会越来越好,因为它们会变得更定制、体验更个性化,真正提升整体体验,而不是打断内容。
I also think brand deals are gonna get better as they become a little bit more custom, as the experiences are more custom, and they really elevate the experience and not interrupt.
比如那个足球创作者、体育类博主Destroying,他来过我们节目。他有一档很火的系列节目,是一对一竞技的形式,有人能赢一万美金。他会去不同的城市,让观众一对一比赛,要么接住球,要么把球挡出去。
So Destroying, who's a football creator, a sports creator that we've had on the show, his hit series is this one on one series where someone, you know, they have like a competition series, you can win $10,000 He goes to different markets, and people compete one on one to either catch a ball or block the ball.
然后NFL就介入合作,说:嘿,你正在做这个系列节目。
And the NFL came in and partnered and said, Hey, you're doing that series.
这是你观看量最高的剧集。
It's your most watched series.
我们为什么不在NFL的市场和体育场里做呢?
Why don't we do it in NFL markets and NFL stadiums?
对吧?
Right?
所以他们深入合作,为他的观众提升了这种体验。
So they came in and like really partnered deeply and elevated that experience for his audience.
我觉得,真正出色的长篇品牌合作,未来就会朝这个方向发展。
And I think that's really where long form brand deals, when they're at their best, are gonna move.
当品牌方意识到,我们不是只想让你花六十到九十秒,简单地传达我们的信息——哪怕这信息对你的观众来说很相关——我们根本不是这个意思。
When a brand comes in and realizes, Hey, we're not just asking you to take up sixty to ninety seconds and deliver our messaging, even if it's relevant to your audience, we're not asking you to do that.
我们真正要做的是,找到一种方式,整体提升你的内容体验。
We're actually gonna find something that elevates the experience overall.
我同意。
I agree.
这个例子我特别喜欢。
I love that example.
但我也觉得,这种合作属于那1%,和99%的品牌合作完全不一样。
But it also strikes me as like, that is a 1% versus 99% brand deal.
对吧?
Right?
没错。
Yeah.
对。
Yep.
我现在的私信比以前多得多,给我的感觉是——
The impression I've gotten as someone who gets, like, more inbound than I used to
是的。
Mhmm.
我收到的那些品牌合作邀约,说实话简直可笑。
The inbound that I get from brands most of the time is, like, laughable to me.
我觉得很多创作者都严重低估了自己的价值。
The impression I get is that so many creators are just wildly underselling themselves.
他们为品牌做专属内容,不管什么形式,报酬却低得可怜。
They're doing like dedicated content, whatever format for these brands for very little money.
曾经有个正经品牌来找我,想赞助我的频道。
I had a brand come to me that was a legitimate brand and they asked about sponsoring the channel.
我报了我们常规的整合推广价格,几千美元起。
And I gave them our typical rate, is in the thousands of dollars for an integration.
他们说,那给300美元怎么样?我直接回绝了。
And they're like, how about $300 And I said, well, no.
现在我们的需求远大于供给,这个价格根本行不通。
We we have more demand than supply and that would not work.
他们说,这只是个测试而已。
They said, well, it's a it's a test.
如果效果不错,再按我们平时的报价来。
And if it goes well, then we'll we'll do your typical rate.
我理解这种做法的用意。
And I can see a circumstance for doing that.
但话说回来,我还是需求大于供给,根本没必要妥协。
But also, again, I have more demand than supply, so I don't need to do that.
我就一直拒绝,他们却一次次小幅加价,最后干脆发了封邮件就没了下文。
I just kept saying no, and they kept incrementally raising their offer just to a no email.
我觉得很多创作者太早答应了,对。
So it's it's like I think a lot of creators are saying yes too early and Mhmm.
而且承诺了超出实际需要的东西。
And promising more than they need to.
对。
Yeah.
我真的很希望更多创作者能更坚定地争取应有的价值,尤其是做专属内容的时候。
I really want more creators to just, like, push further on the worth, especially if they're doing dedicated content.
我有很多想法想说,先说第一个。
I have a cup I have a ton of thoughts on this actually.
我认为创作者和你在Facebook上买的广告完全不一样,根本不是一回事。
So number one, I think creators are not a replacement or even similar in any way, shape or form to your advertising that you bought on Facebook or that you buy on Facebook.
但有时候人们却把两者混为一谈,觉得‘那我们就拿Jay做个测试吧’。
And I think sometimes that is they're equated where it's like, Hey, yeah, we're just gonna do a test with Jay.
我们花多少钱,就和投一条Facebook广告一样。
We'll spend as much as we would have spent on a post on Facebook.
看看反馈怎么样,转化率如何,再决定下一步。
We'll see how the responses, we'll see how conversions are, and we'll go from there.
我觉得这种看法完全误解了创作者究竟是谁、做什么的。
I think that's a completely incorrect view of what a creator is and what a creator does.
因为有一部分是,不管你怎样,你都能获得这个曝光机会和时间。
Because there's a part of it that's just like, Hey, you're getting the space and the time no matter what.
这就跟电视广告一样。
It's like a TV ad.
至于你作为品牌能不能转化,这不在我这个创作者身上,而是在你那儿。
Now, your ability to convert as a brand is not on me as the creator, it's on you.
如果你希望这能发展成一种长期关系,那我就得仔细研究你的转化漏斗,搞清楚我引导观众去的那个地方,到底是不是真的能促成转化。
And if you want that to be more of a relationship, then I need to really look into your conversion funnel and understand how good the place is where I'm sending my audience to, to actually get a conversion.
如果我的工作是讲这个品牌,而且这个内容会一直留在我的频道里,那就是深度整合。
And so if my job is to talk about the brand and that's gonna live in my content forever, it's a baked in integration.
这价值非常高。
That's extremely valuable.
我完全同意你的观点。
I totally agree with you.
但你要怎么应对这种本能的渴望呢?首先,我觉得这里面有一种被认可的需求——作为创作者,品牌愿意跟你合作、从你的内容里赚钱,这本身就是一种肯定。
Now, how to defend against that inherent desire when you're First of all, I think there's an element of validation where it's like, as a creator, the validation comes from a brand wanting to work with you and making money from your content.
如果你刚起步,想把这事做成事业,可能会愿意接受更低的报价,就为了先积累经验。
You might be willing to accept a lower rate if you're just starting out and trying to figure out, trying to make this a thing.
还有一种恐惧,就是如果不接,可能一分钱都拿不到。
There's also fear that the alternative is no money.
没错。
Right.
对吧?
Right?
你明白供需关系,但不是所有创作者都懂这个道理。
Like you understand your supply and demand, but not all creators understand.
很多人会陷入一种心态,觉得这可能是自己好一段时间里最后的机会了。
And many times will find themselves in a situation where they might think this is their last opportunity for a while.
所以我觉得特别重要的是,刚开始的时候,别让频道成为你唯一的经济来源,这样你才有底气说‘不’。
And that's why I think unbelievably important that in the beginning, you aren't tied financially to your channel so that you can say no is really hard.
但要建立一个能说‘不’的机制,我们在《创作者创业营》里做的,就是设定一个品牌合作的最低价格底线。
But to build a mechanism to say no, what we did and what we work on in Creator Startup Pro is building a brand deal floor price.
简单说,就是问自己:我的底线价格是多少?
So basically going, what is my floor price?
也就是说,不管发生什么,我都不会接受比这更低的报价。
Like, what is just the no matter what, I will not go lower than this price?
我觉得这部分其实跟播放量单价或者数据指标关系不大,更多是看你自己的生活方式、个人目标,以及你希望从频道里赚多少钱。
I think a lot of that actually has to do not with CPMs or not with metrics, just based on your own lifestyle and your own desire and your own circumstances of how much money you want to make from your channel.
有时候,你的底线价格会远高于市场行情。
Now, sometimes your floor price is gonna be way higher than your market rate.
这意味着你需要扩大粉丝群,提升内容质量,一步步达到那个水平。
And that means that you need to grow your audience, you need to make your content better, you need to get there.
但我真的认为,你必须有能力拒绝任何低于底线价格的合作。
But I really think you need to be in a position to say no to anything under your floor price.
我们当时为了确保自己不低价出卖,就是提前准备好一套应对材料,这样当收到邮件说‘非常感谢联系我们’的时候,就能从容应对。
How we did this to make sure that we weren't underselling ourselves is actually just develop materials so that when we get that email, Hey, thank you so much for reaching out.
这是我们的提案简报。
Here's our pitch deck.
里面清楚列出了我们的报价。
And that actually has our pricing in it.
这个报价是基于本月制定的。
And that pricing is rooted in this month.
也就是二月的报价。
So this is February pricing.
我们并不固定这个价格。
We're not committed to it.
如果你三月再来,而我们的价格已经上调了,那你就拿这份二月的报价来谈。
If you wanna come back in March, if our rates have gone up, here's our February pricing.
只要亮出价格,就能立刻筛掉不合适的人。
And you immediately weed out people by going, Here's my rate.
很多人觉得这在谈判上反其道而行之,他们会想:干嘛把自己的底牌亮出来?
Now a lot of people think that's counterintuitive from a negotiation perspective because they're like, Why would you show your cards?
你干嘛非得说,跟我们合作要花五千美元?
Why would you go, Hey, it costs $5,000 to work with us.
其实这么做的目的,也是为了让你更专注于内容本身。
Well, a lot of that is just to also keep you focused on the content.
如果你的底线就是五千,那你可以直接说,五千一单,但我们只卖三单一套。
If that's your floor price and you go, Hey, it's $5,000 We sell these in packs of three.
如果你想和《Colin 和 Samir 的节目》合作,那总价就是一万五。
It's a $15,000 buy if you wanna work with The Colin and Samir Show.
明白了。
Okay.
很好。
Great.
简单说,你到底要不要参与?
Basically, are you in or not?
你也可以直接说,这价格对我来说太贵了。
And you can go, that's too expensive for me.
好的。
Okay.
听起来不错。
Sounds good.
没问题。
All good.
或者,其实这样也行。
Or, hey, actually, that works.
太好了。
Great.
搞定。
Boom.
事情就这么定了。
We're done.
事情就是这么办的。
This is how it works.
现在我们可以把它落地,搭建一个系统,这样我就能专心做内容了。
Now we can operationalize it and build a system for it, and I can stay focused on the content.
我觉得谈品牌合作要考虑的事情很多,不只是钱的问题。
So I think there's a lot of considerations when it comes to brand deals, and it's not just money.
还有很多是关于时间、精力,以及能不能真正为观众带来价值。
A lot of it also has to do with time, space, ability to deliver value to your audience.
这个合作伙伴合适吗?
Is this the right partner?
他们是以转化率来衡量成功的吗?
Are they measuring success based on conversions?
品牌合作这一行,需要考虑的因素太多了。
All kinds of considerations when it comes to the world of brand deals.
回到你之前提到的信任问题,还有你和蒂姆那期节目的事。
To go back to your point about trust, and the the reference to your episode with Tim.
我特别喜欢你和蒂姆的那期节目。
I love that episode with Tim.
蒂姆很少接受访谈,所以我一听他的采访就特别兴奋。
Tim very rarely does interviews, so I'm just so excited to listen to them.
我觉得他在你节目里的那期访谈特别独特。
And I thought his interview on your show is one of the more unique ones.
这让我开始思考我们自己的广告合作和运营,因为我意识到,每一次与观众的接触其实都是一种背书。
It got me thinking about our own ad opportunity or ad operations because what I realized was every integration to our audience is an endorsement.
不管我自己是不是觉得这是背书,我都应该把它当成背书来看待。
Whether I think it's an endorsement or not, I should probably think of it as an endorsement.
所以,从品牌合作的角度,我已经大幅收紧了我们业务中的筛选标准——如果对听众来说这本身就是一种背书,那我们何不从这个前提出发?
And so I've really tightened the aperture on what we do across the business from a brand deal perspective because if it's an endorsement to the person receiving it, what if we started with that assumption?
这样一来,我还能多有底气、多真诚地去推荐这些品牌,让结果变成:当杰ay推荐某个品牌时,我知道我完全可以认真对待,也完全信任他。
And how enthusiastically could I then actually, in integrity, endorse these brands and have these outcomes of, okay, when Jay advertises somebody, I know I can take him seriously and trust him on this.
但这样做的代价是,你能接受的合作对象会变得非常少,如果你本身机会就不多,这确实是个难题。
But it really tightens the window of who you accept, which can be a real problem if you don't have a lot of opportunities.
很明显,这有点
Obviously, it's kind
一种
of a
奢侈的烦恼,但我完全同意你的观点,就是别把预算全押在这上面。
luxury problem to have, but I totally agree with your idea of don't hinge your budget on this.
那这就引出一个问题,那我该怎么付账单呢?
But then that kind of begs the question, how do I how do I pay the bills then?
如果我不把预算押在这上面,我又刚起步,收入也不高。
If I can't hinge my budget on it, I'm just getting started and I'm not getting a ton of revenue.
我觉得这是问题的另一面:你能不能找到除了品牌合作和AdSense之外的变现方式?
And I think that's the other side of the equation of can you find means of monetization that are not brand deals, that are not AdSense?
对。
Yeah.
说实话,我觉得我们在起步阶段做过的最重要的事情之一,也是我们在《创作者创业专业课》里会讲到的内容,就是先想清楚我们到底想赚多少钱。
Mean, I think one of the most important things we ever did in the very early stages, and something we go into in Creator Startup Pro as well, is like, look at how much money do we actually want to make.
好的,我们两个人。
Okay, there's two of us.
我们想要赚这么多钱,也必须赚这么多钱。
This is how much money we want to make, how much money we need to make.
好,我们一个月能做多少集呢?
All right, here's how many episodes we can make in a given month.
把这个目标金额除以集数。
Let's divide that amount by these episodes.
假设每集都能赚这么多钱。
Let's say we could make that much money per all of these episodes.
那我们需要做多少集?
How many do we need to make?
我记得刚开始定价格的时候,每单整合大概1200美元,我们算了一下,天啊,一个月得做八单才行。
I remember the first time we ever did that with our rate, which when we were first starting out was probably around $1,200 in integration, we realized, Oh my gosh, we need to make like eight of these a month.
这根本不现实。
That is not realistic.
就算能做八单,也没办法把所有单子都填满。
And even if we could make eight, there's no way we could fill all of those.
这些视频不可能全部都卖出去。
We can't have a 100% fill rate on those videos.
所以,等等,我们得彻底重新想想了。
So, okay, wow, we need to take a major step back.
实际情况是,每个月可能只能卖出去一到两个,对吧?
The reality is we may only fill one to two of those a month, right?
而且我们最多也只能拍四支。
And we can only make four.
这样一来我们就看清楚了,光靠这个根本养不活我们,得另找出路。
So now we're able to look and go, well, clearly this cannot support our lifestyle, so we have to look elsewhere.
于是我们转做起了自由制片公司。
And we did, turn into a bit of like a freelance production company.
这在当时算是权宜之计,对吧?
That was our solution for the time being, right?
所以我觉得,像你所说的,能说‘不’确实是一种奢侈。
And so I think it is a, as you said, it's a luxury to be able to say no.
但我觉得,你得努力守住能说‘不’的这个立场,对吧?
But I think you have to fight to stay in that lane of being able to say no, right?
因为萨米尔总说,你是什么人,取决于你拒绝了什么;如果你能坚持在这个范围内说‘不’,长远来看你会受益。
Because Samir always says this, but like, you are what you say no to, And you will benefit long term if you're able to stay in that pocket and say no.
我觉得科林在我们的视频里提到过,叫什么‘十三年的YouTube经验’之类的。
I think Colin said in our video, it's called like thirteen years of YouTube knowledge and something like that.
四十六分钟。
Forty six minutes.
四十六分钟。
Forty six minutes.
他给新手创作者的第一个建议是:先找份工作。
His advice to new creators, number one was get a job.
找一份跟YouTube无关的工作。
Get a job that's not YouTube.
因为这一点,我真的怎么强调都不为过。
Because just, again, I can't harp on that enough.
给自己一些时间和空间,让YouTube自然发展,这样你才能走得更久。
Giving yourself the time and space to let YouTube develop is going to give you a lot more longevity.
真的就是这样。
It just is.
要是干了一年就焦虑起来,觉得必须得靠这个养活自己,那就不一样了。
Versus getting stressed a year in and being like, I need to be able to support myself.
你会开始做出一些损害信任的决定。
You're gonna start making decisions that are gonna lose trust.
蒂姆·费里斯在节目里也说过这话。
And Tim Ferriss said this on the show.
我们老是提到他。
We keep bringing him up.
他说,信任是一滴一滴积累起来的,却能一桶一桶地丢掉。
But he said, trust is gained in drops and lost in buckets.
我觉得这一点特别重要。
And I think that's an incredibly important thing to do.
所以,你要让自己处于一个能做出正确决策的位置,这些决策要符合你最重要的客户——也就是你的观众——的利益。
And and you wanna put yourself in a in a position to make decisions that are in in line with your number one customer, which is your audience.
对吧?
Right?
你的观众是冲着有价值的产品来的。
Your your audience is there for the product of value.
他们就是你的客户。
They are your customer.
你得根据这些原则,以及你承诺给他们的价值来做决定。
You have to make decisions in line with them and and the value that you promise to provide to them.
你们把周边产品看作是收入来源,还是品牌忠诚度建设的手段呢?
Do you guys look at your merch line as a revenue generator or as a brand loyalty
品牌忠诚度。
move?
对,品牌忠诚度。
Brand loyalty,
是的。
yeah.
后者,但我认为它也有潜力带来收入。
The latter, but I think it could be a revenue.
对,它确实有这个机会。
Yeah, think it has the opportunity to be.
只是我们还没花太多时间和精力去把它做成一个成熟的体系。
We just, have not put a ton of time and energy into operationalizing it.
对吧?
Right?
我们同一个帽子的设计都用了四年了。
Making sure that, you know, we've had the same hat designed for four years.
很明显,这里错失了一个机会。
So clearly, there's like a missed opportunity there.
我们可以请个人来专门负责这件事。
We could have someone who's helping us.
我们做这个决定,是为了打造品牌,让别人一看到就能认出来。
The decision, we did that so that we could build brand, and so that people recognized it as it started to show up.
但很明显,如果有人能花更多时间和精力去做,这完全有可能变成一个赚钱的机会。
But clearly, if we had someone spending more time and energy than us, I think there could be a revenue opportunity.
我真的很希望把它做成更大的事业。
Would absolutely love to make it a bigger thing, for sure.
我觉得这是我们和更多艺术家合作、推出有趣联名商品的好机会。
And I think it's an opportunity for us to collaborate with more artists and do interesting collaborations on the merchandise.
这可是个绝佳的画布。
It's a great canvas.
虽然我们花在商品上的时间不多,但确实花了很多心思在帽子的设计上。
And for how little we have spent time on the merchandise, I think we did spend a lot of time thinking through the hat.
我们对帽子的要求特别高,对颜色的选择也特别讲究——
We were very particular about the hat and very particular about which colors we did and-
还有从一开始打造这个品牌的全过程
And the whole brand of starting it
结束了。
out.
品牌本身。
Brand itself.
但没有什么比看到那么多人戴着这顶帽子更让人欣慰的了。
But there's nothing greater than seeing how many people wear that hat.
对我来说,这才是最酷的事。
To me, that is the coolest thing.
最棒的是,我们发现有人会在Instagram上发帖,说因为对方戴着Press Publisher的帽子,他们交到了朋友。
And the best thing is that we see that people sometimes post on Instagram, they're like, I made a friend because he was wearing a press publisher.
对我来说,这就对了。
To me is like, boom.
这才是真正的社群。
That's community.
这才是我们受众的真实体现,也是我最想为这个世界带来的价值。
That's the real manifestation of our audience and a big service to the world that I would want.
我们公司里让我感到骄傲的一切,都是我十年前特别想拥有的。
Everything that I feel proud of in our business is stuff that I wish I had ten years ago.
所以我觉得,只要有人戴上压印出版的帽子或衣服,别人一眼就能明白,他们属于同一个圈子,分享同样的兴趣。
And so I think knowing that someone can walk up to someone else and immediately have context and know that they're part of the same tribe of stuff that they're into just by wearing a press publish hat or a press publisher.
对我来说,这太棒了。
To me, that's super cool.
这正是我十年前渴望的东西。
And that's what I craved ten years ago.
所以任何——我们
So anything- We
一直都说,我们是凯西·纽斯塔特的超级粉丝,相信很多人都一样。
always said like, we're huge Casey Neistat fans, as I'm sure a lot of people are.
我们总在想,要是有一件衣服印着‘多做点’,风格就像他手臂上的纹身那样,该多好,这样就能表明我们看过他的视频,也是这个社群的一分子。
But we always said we would have loved a a shirt that said do more in the style of the tattoo that he has on his arm, right, to, like, signify that we were watching those vlogs and we were a part of that community.
对我们来说,压印出版的标志、帽子和T恤,说的就是这个意思。
And I for us, the press publish logo, the hats, the shirts, I think that's what that is.
你觉得短视频的发展方向会是怎样的?
What do you think is the evolution of Shorts?
我们注意到观看次数的统计方式正在发生变化。
We see that views are being changed in the way they're counted.
你认为短视频在YouTube上,对创作者来说,扮演着什么角色?
What what do you see as the role Shorts plays in YouTube and for creators?
我发现自己越来越容易陷入选择困难,明明想看长视频,却直接刷起了短视频。
I find myself more and more getting faced with decision paralysis and long form content and jumping straight into the Shorts feed.
我不确定别人是不是也这样。
I don't know if other people are like that.
我甚至都不确定科林是不是也这样。
I actually don't even know if Colin's like that.
但我确实看了很多短视频。
But I watch a ton of Shorts.
我觉得问题不在于短视频最终会走向哪里。
I don't think it's actually the question of where Shorts nets us out.
我觉得问题在于,我们的注意力在长时间内被切割得有多碎。
I think it's the question of how fragmented our attention gets over long periods of time.
我今年三十多岁,但我会聊《人生切割术》和《白莲花度假村》这样的剧。
Because I'm a guy that is mid thirties, but I talked about Severance and White Lotus.
我看《人生切割术》的某些集时,根本坐不住,总忍不住去拿手机,就想赶紧看下一段内容。
I could barely watch some episodes of Severance without reaching for my phone because I need that quick hit of the next piece of content.
我觉得短视频永远都会有它的位置。
I think Shorts will always have a place.
从内容变现的角度看,它们未必是最棒的盈利模式,但确实降低了创作门槛,也更容易吸引注意力。
I don't think they're the greatest monetization mechanism from a content perspective, but I do think they are a lower barrier to entry for content, high opportunity for attention.
但你得特别小心,别光顾着刷播放量,忘了真正打造品牌。
But you just have to be really careful that you're not just building views, that you're actually building a brand.
对。
Yeah.
我觉得YouTube Shorts现在还谈不上像TikTok或Reels那样主导或推动文化潮流。
I don't believe yet that YouTube Shorts specifically dictates or drives culture, like a TikTok or Reels, right?
你可以轻松地把一条TikTok或Reel发给任何人。
Like you can send someone really easily a TikTok or a Reel.
它就像一种对话单位,能帮你和别人建立联系。
It's a unit of conversation to connect you with someone else.
但我觉得Shorts不行,因为YouTube本来就不是个聊天平台。
And I don't find that Shorts, just because YouTube is not a messaging platform.
所以我认为,如果Shorts真想成为文化推手,这会是个巨大的障碍。
So I think that's a huge barrier to, if Shorts is able to really become a culture driver.
我觉得现在它充其量只是额外的数据而已。
I think right now it's just extra data, right?
这些数据或许能吸引观众去点开你的长视频,但我怀疑刷短视频的人根本没打算去看长内容。
That hopefully maybe informs a viewer if they wanna watch your long form, but I'm not sure that people in a short form feed are even really thinking about going long form.
Shorts另一个让人头疼的地方是,我妻子特别喜欢TikTok,她简直把它当搜索引擎用。
What's also really frustrating about Shorts, my wife, loves TikTok, and she uses it like a search engine like crazy.
我们想从好市多买一张沙发。
We wanna go buy this couch from Costco.
她会去找一条专门评测科斯科沙发的TikTok视频。
She's gonna find a specific TikTok reviewing that couch on Costco.
没错。
Totally.
TikTok被封的时候,她在YouTube上根本找不到同样的内容。
When when TikTok was banned, she could not find that same content on YouTube.
对她来说,体验完全不一样。
It was not the same experience for her.
她特别沮丧,这挺讽刺的,毕竟YouTube本来就是个搜索引擎。
She was very frustrated, which is ironic because YouTube is a search engine historically.
对。
Mhmm.
就是完全没法比。
And it's just not the same experience.
说到短视频内容,比如Instagram,我们真不能忽略Instagram。
When it comes to short form content, like Instagram, I don't think we can overlook Instagram.
在美國,Instagram 感覺就像一個主要的文化中心。
Instagram feels like in The US, a major cultural epicenter.
我在 Instagram 上發東西時,別人談到它的頻率,遠高於我在 YouTube 上發內容。
When I post something on Instagram in conversation, it is brought up to me a lot more than if I post something on YouTube.
我覺得這很大程度上是因為 Instagram 已經成了美國的文化操作系統。
And I think a lot of that is just because that is kind of this cultural operating system of The United States.
就像科林提到的,訊息功能是其中一個重要原因。
And I think messaging, like Colin mentioned, is a major reason for that.
很多人在 Instagram 上頻繁發訊息。
People are messaging a lot on Instagram.
人們會在 Instagram 上互相傳遞內容。
People are messaging each other content on Instagram.
我覺得 Instagram 就像一個重要的社交樞紐。
And I think Instagram is this major social hub.
所以如果我從更廣的視角來看短視頻內容,我會把 Instagram 當成首選平台。
And so I actually think if I was zooming out and thinking about short form content, I would think Instagram as my main destination.
别走开。
Don't go anywhere.
马上回来。
We'll be right back.
接下来,请继续收听我和科林、萨米尔的对话。
And now please enjoy the rest of my conversation with Colin and Samir.
那来个吓人的预测吧?
What about a scary prediction?
你觉得可能会发生什么事,要是真发生了,会对创作者生态造成负面影响?
Something that you think might happen, and if it does, that would be a net bad thing for the Creator Space.
我不确定这算不算坏事,但最近我注意到自己在电视上看YouTube的方式有点不一样了。
I don't know if this is a a bad thing, but this is something that I've been noticing very recently with the way that I watch YouTube, specifically on TV.
在主页上,你把鼠标悬停在视频上,它就会自动播放四十秒。
As you're on the homepage, you can hover over a video and it auto plays for forty seconds.
四十秒足够我判断要不要看这个视频了。
Forty seconds is a lot of time for me to understand if I wanna watch that video or not.
我知道这会被算作一次播放,也会加入你的观看记录。
And I know it registers as a view, and it becomes part of your watch history.
但我现在看长视频的次数少多了,因为只要悬停一下,就能大概知道内容,不合适就直接划走。
But I am watching way less longer form videos because I can just hover and see what it's like and then move on.
我知道加洛韦总说YouTube是个‘点击即看’的平台。
I know Galloway always calls YouTube a click and watch platform.
我觉得现在更像‘悬停即钩住’的平台。
I think it's like a hover and hook platform.
对。
Yeah.
随着越来越多的人在电视上看视频,
The more that it's being watched on TVs.
我觉得开头几秒的吸引力现在变得无比关键,因为缩略图的作用可能没那么大了。
I think your hook becomes unbelievably important now that thumbnails maybe become a little bit less important.
我觉得这不过是两端差距越拉越大的趋势在持续加剧。
I think it's just that the dumbbell continues to build and widen the gap between these two ends.
一端是那种电视级别的YouTube内容。
At one end, it's like the TV quality YouTube.
YouTube在智能电视上是最常使用的应用,比如MrBeast、Mark Rober、Dude Perfect、Ryan Trahan这些人。
So, again, YouTube, most watched app on connected TV, MrBeast, Mark Rober, Dude Perfect, Ryan Trahan.
他们的视频时长有三十八分钟,甚至四十分钟,还有二十多分钟的长内容,都是在智能电视上观看的,制作精良、预算高,Michelle Carre和Cleo Abram也属于这一类。
These are thirty eight minutes or, you know, forty minute long piece of content, 22 plus that are watched on connected TV, high budget, high production, Michelle Carre, Cleo Abram in this camp as well.
而在哑铃的另一端,是短视频内容。
And on the other end of the dumbbell, you have short form content.
这些短视频正在平台上被大量观看。
And short form content is being consumed on the platform.
我能明显感受到YouTube目前主要聚焦在这两个方向上。
These are the two major focuses that I can feel from YouTube.
我担心的是,中间的部分正逐渐被忽略。
My concern is that all of the middle gets kind of lost.
那么,中间这部分内容会怎么样呢?
And the question of what happens to the middle?
这些创作者能撑到YouTube下一次升级吗?
Can those creators hold on long enough for kind of the next evolution of YouTube?
这正是我担心的,也是我想问的。
So I think that's my fear and my question.
作为普通观众,我发现我越看越偏向那些特别小众的内容。
I mean, as a just a consumer, I'm finding that I'm watching more and more extremely niche content.
YouTube有个数据说,47%的Z世代喜欢的东西,是他们身边没人喜欢的。
There's a stat from YouTube that 47% of Gen Z are a fan of something that no one they know personally is a fan of.
太有意思了。
Super interesting.
我觉得这种趋势还会继续,YouTube、整个互联网,还有人们的注意力都在越来越碎片化。
I think that is continuing to happen, the hyper fragmentation of YouTube and of the internet and of attention.
但那些中间地带的创作者,有赚钱的模式吗?
But is there a business model for those people in the middle?
我希望答案是有的。
My hope is yes.
我担心钱会流向这两个极端:一边是长视频和高端制作,另一边是能当付费广告用的超短内容。
My fear is that the money will go to either side of those dumbbells.
资金会流向长视频、高质量制作,以及那些能当广告投放的极短内容。
It'll go to long form, high end productions, and extremely short form content that can be used as paid media, and as, like, you know, short form advertising.
我们还从来没聊过流媒体这件事。
One thing we haven't talked about at all is streaming.
对。
Yeah.
你们以前提到过,现场体育赛事是一种在人工智能时代越来越珍贵的真实人类体验。
And you guys have talked about in the past, how live sports are this verifiable human experience that is getting more and more valuable in the age of AI.
我觉得直播也属于这一类。
And it strikes me that live streaming is in that camp as well.
你对直播怎么看?
What's your take on live streaming?
从科林和萨米尔的角度来看,你们觉得直播有意思吗?
Is it interesting to you guys from the Colin and Samir perspective?
因为我知道,历史上很多主播都说过,整个蛋糕就这么大。
Because I know historically, lot of streamers have said, we're kind of the pie is kind of fixed.
如果我们想吸引更多观众,那只能从其他平台抢人。
If we're gonna get more viewers, we're pulling it from other channels.
是的。
Yeah.
想听听你们的看法。
Curious of your perspective.
我们根本不可能有足够的娱乐性去做直播。
We are in no way, shape, or form entertaining enough to to livestream.
这完全不可能做到。
There's just no possible way.
对。
Yeah.
对我来说,直播这件事真的很奇怪。
Livestreaming to me is is bizarre to me.
我偶尔会打开Twitch看看都在播什么。
Like, I'll plug in every once in a while to Twitch and just see what's happening.
有时候一看,居然有七八万人在看。
And there'll be like, you know, seventy, eighty thousand people watching.
上周五我看了一个直播,不是凯本人,但属于凯那个宇宙里的其他角色。
And on Friday, I tuned into a live stream of, it wasn't Kai, but it was like other members in Kai's universe.
我简直是在看一场现场戏剧。
And I was watching basically live action theater.
好几个角色从各自的视角直播,其中一个人准备炸掉一栋房子。
There were multiple characters streaming from their own POVs, and someone was about to, like, blow up a house.
他们俩都在直播,我在旁边看,突然意识到,这不就是WWE吗?
Like, they're both live streaming it, and I'm watching, and I'm realizing, like, this is like WWE.
我不知道他们的编剧会议是什么样子,但这活脱脱就是一场现场版的WWE,十万观众同时盯着两个视角看。
Like, I don't know what these writing meetings look like, but this is basically like WWE happening live, and there's 100,000 people tuning into both angles.
我真不知道该怎么形容,但我觉得特别有意思——这些播客,本质上就跟过去的收音机一样。
And I really, I don't know what to make of it, but I just find it fascinating that like all of these, podcasts are essentially the radio.
长视频平台上的内容,本质上就是电视和流媒体。
Like, long form YouTube is essentially TV and streaming.
而像这种直播形式,就像是现场戏剧在上演。
And then you have live streaming like this, which is live action theater playing out.
真有意思,这些东西以不同的形式又回来了。
It's just so interesting that these things are coming back in different forms.
是的。
Yeah.
这让我想起以前放学回家,随便打开MTV,它就一直在播。
It it reminds me so much of just, like, deciding to like, the ease of turning on MTV when you came home from school, and it's just on.
播什么就是什么,根本没法挑。
And whatever's on is on.
一会儿是TRL,一会儿是《房间搜查》,反正啥都有。
It's TRL, and then it's Room Raiders or whatever.
然后突然就切到现实世界了。
And then it's the real world.
你就只是,嗯,随它去吧。
And you're just like, yeah.
挺好的。
Cool.
我最近一直看这个频道。
I'm just, like, with this channel for a while.
我觉得直播正好填补了我之前说的那种选择困难,它让我有个伴儿陪着,挺舒服的。
And I actually think live streaming occupies some of that where the decision paralysis I talked about, I think it gives me a nice place to just have a companion.
我觉得陪伴式观看特别重要。
And I think companion viewing is a big deal
现在就是这样。
right now.
很多人吃饭的时候,你几乎找不到一个独自吃午饭却不拿手机的人,对吧?
And it's something that a lot of people like, You'd be hard pressed to find someone having lunch by themselves without a phone in their hand, right?
一点可能都没有。
No chance.
这早就不是过去的事了。
That's just not a thing of the past.
你不会再那样做了。
You're not gonna do that.
我觉得直播之所以有陪伴感,就是因为人们只是想有个声音或画面陪着。
And I think live streaming occupies that companion nature of like, I just want something on.
对我而言,YouTube 也是走的这条路。
Even for me, YouTube exists in that lane.
当我打开电视上的 YouTube 时,只有两种状态。
When I turn on YouTube on my TV, I'm only in two modes.
要么是边做别的事当背景音放着,要么就是专心找东西,认真盯着屏幕看。
It's either background viewing while I'm doing something else or intently looking for something to actually look at the screen.
但我觉得直播主让我们看到,文化影响力来自于长时间的陪伴。
But I think live streamers have shown us that cultural relevance comes from time spent.
播客也是这样,两三个小时的长节目,才能在长时间积累中形成文化影响力。
I think podcasting is the same way, two, three hour long podcast, that creates cultural relevance over long periods of time.
凯·西纳特,我常看Speed。
Kai Sinat, I show Speed.
这些创作者让你几乎每天都能看,如果你每天花八个小时的话。
These creators are like, you have the opportunity to watch them almost every day if you're like eight hours a day.
所以你能花在他们身上的时间非常多。
So the opportunity for time spent is very high.
这会建立起非常深厚的关系,进而带来巨大的文化影响力。
That creates deep, deep, deep relationships, which then creates a lot of cultural relevance.
我觉得,这又回到了短视频的问题上。
And I think, again, that comes back to the question of short form.
短视频能有同样的文化影响力吗?还是说TikTok本身就具有文化影响力?
Can short form have the same cultural relevance or is TikTok culturally relevant?
因为你花在TikTok上的时间真的很多。
Because you're spending a ton of time on TikTok.
我觉得这一点挺有意思的。
So I think that's an interesting thing.
回到刚才的问题,我们会做直播吗?
Back to the question, would we ever livestream?
我们确实会做直播问答。
We do live Q and As.
我们也会做教育类直播,特别有意思。
We do educational lives, which is really fun.
我们以前办过教育课程,全程都是直播的。
We've done cohorts for our education where we are live.
特别有趣。
Super fun.
但我很清楚直播的价值在哪里。
But I understand the value exchange of that live really well.
但我搞不懂,当几十万甚至上百万人在看,只说‘逗我开心’的时候,这价值在哪?
I don't understand the value exchange when a million or a 100,000 people are watching and being like, entertain me.
明白了。
Alright.
最后一个问题是。
Actual last question.
有葡萄吗?
Any grapes?
多得是呢,杰伊。
So many, Jay.
一直都有很多。
There's so many all the time.
让我想想,我刚吃过一个特别好的。
Let me think because I just had a really good one.
对。
Yeah.
我觉得,男生之间的握手挺有讲究的。
I I would say, like, handshakes between guys in general.
天哪。
Oh my gosh.
就是因为没什么特别的
Just because there's
没角度可言。
no angle.
我是不是在往下沉?
Am I going down?
我们有这么多选择,却还得靠猜对方的心思,决定该用哪种握手方式,这简直太荒谬了。
Options available to us, and somehow we're supposed to read each other's mind and just figure out, like, what type of handshake we're gonna do, I just think it's preposterous.
确实很棒。
Big time great.
我觉得你得主动一点。
Well, I think you have to lead.
关键是,要缓解这种紧张感,
Like, the thing, to quell that anxiety,
我确实会主动,但之后我就觉得,那样做不像我。
you I do lead, but then I just I don't go like that's not me.
我就直接上,主动带头。
I just go with just go And lead.
我就直接伸手去握手。
I just go handshake.
我就说,嘿。
Was like, hey.
你好吗?
How are you?
是的。
Yeah.
问题是咱们两个人都在。
The issue is there's two of us.
所以很多时候我们得在握手这件事上配合默契,但我尽量每次都主动先伸手。
So we have to be in sync a lot of times with these handshakes, but I I try and go first as much as possible.
所以嘛。
So yeah.
是的。
Yeah.
但我真希望我们能干脆点,当初疫情期间,大家都说要淘汰握手了,我还以为真能呢。
But I wish we could just you know, I thought during COVID, we're like people were like, oh, we're getting rid of the handshake.
我当时就想,行吧。
And I was like, ah, alright.
挺好。
Like, good.
这
Like, this
真不错。
is great.
我手机里还记着一堆不满呢。
I have a gripes note in my iPhones.
让我看看我都记了些什么。
Let me see what I have.
你有吗,杰伊?
Do you have one, Jay?
好的。
Okay.
天哪。
Oh, man.
我本该为此做点准备的。
I should have prepared for this.
这是我的问题。
It is my question.
我有几个想说的,可能之前在节目里提过,但我还是再讲几个,看看有没有哪个能引起你的共鸣。
I I I have a couple that I think I've already said on the show, but I will I'll say a couple of them to see if you any of them resonate with you.
我最大的抱怨大概是,你去咖啡店点单说:"来杯卡布奇诺。"
Let's Probably my number one gripe in the world is when you go to a coffee shop and you say, can I have a cappuccino?
对方回答:"好的。"
And they go, yeah.
要什么尺寸?
What size?
浓缩咖啡就一种尺寸,杰伊。
Cappuccino is one size, Jay.
就一种尺寸。
It's one size.
这是浓缩咖啡。
It's a cappuccino.
三分之一、三分之一、三分之一。
It's a third, a third, a third.
本来就只有一种尺寸。
There's only one size.
别问我浓缩咖啡要什么尺寸。
Do not ask me what size I want for my cappuccino.
正好八盎司。
It's eight ounces.
好吧。
Alright.
另一个是恐怖片预告片插在非恐怖片前面。
The other is a horror movie trailer before a non horror movie.
如果我进电影院是来看浪漫喜剧或者冒险片的,就别给我放《驱魔人》的预告片。
If I've gone into a movie theater to see a romantic comedy or like an adventure film, do not show me a trailer for The Exorcist.
我的预期可不是来被吓一跳的。
My context is not that I'm here to be freaked out.
我不想看到鬼魂满屋子吐东西。
I don't wanna see a ghost throwing up all over someone.
我进这个影厅的时候,根本不是想看这个。
That's not what I wanted when I walked in this room.
我以前也说过一次,但刚才突然想起来了。
I've said this one before too, but it just came to mind.
有时候广告是拍给横屏看的,却硬加个竖屏边框,假装是抖音上的视频,其实制作精良,明显花了几十万美元,还故意剪成好像真是谁随手拍的抖音内容。
When there is an ad that plays on a horizontal screen, but they've put like a fake vertical frame to make it seem like it's on TikTok, but it's really high production and still you can tell it was like a multi $100,000 ad, but they've cut it to look like it happens to be someone with a tick like, on TikTok.
关于 Bayt 播客
Bayt 提供中文+原文双语音频和字幕,帮助你打破语言障碍,轻松听懂全球优质播客。