本集简介
双语字幕
仅展示文本字幕,不包含中文音频;想边听边看,请使用 Bayt 播客 App。
现在是Mac Break每周节目时间。
It's time for Mac break weekly.
安迪到了。
Andy's here.
杰森也来了。
Jason's here.
克里斯蒂娜也在。
Christina's here.
我们来聊聊对WWDC的期待。
We will talk about what we expect at WWDC.
苹果带来了一些令人期待的消息,比如他们提到的无障碍功能,还有教皇对人工智能的评论,以及这会对Siri产生什么影响,更多内容马上继续,尽在Mac Break每周节目。
Apple has some tantalizing tidbits, including in the things they mentioned about accessibility, plus what the pope had to say about AI and what that means for Siri, that, and a whole lot more coming up next on MacBreak weekly.
你喜爱的播客。
Podcasts you love.
来自你信赖的人。
From people you trust.
这是TWiT。
This is TWiT.
这是MacBreak Weekly,第1026期,录制于2026年5月26日星期二。
This is MacBreak Weekly, episode ten twenty six, recorded Tuesday, 05/26/2026.
双屏模式。
Double wide mode.
该到MacBreak Weekly的时间了。
It's time for Mac break weekly.
对。
Yes.
大家好。
Hello, everybody.
又到了星期二,我们这群苹果资讯拖延大师照例为大家带来一整天的苹果最新动态。
Another Tuesday and another fabulous day of Apple News shared with us by our peerless panel of pomme procrastination.
你直接说‘评论员’就行了。
You can just say pundits.
没错,一群无可替代的评论员。
Peerless panel of pundits works.
评论员,手掌评论员。
Palm palm pundits.
我特意掺了点法语,好凑个‘帕尔米盖雷特’。
I mixed some French in there just to get another Parmigrette.
那是杰森·石榴评论员。
That's Jason pomegranate pundits.
评论员。
Pundits.
你好。
Hello.
那是杰森·斯内尔,sixcolors.com。
That's Jason Snell six colors dot com.
他下次不会再和我们在一起了。
The last time he'll be with us no.
不会。
No.
你下周还会和我们在一起。
You'll be with us next week.
哦,下周你们在,然后我接下来两周不在,因为我要去库比蒂诺的荒野,之后再去俄勒冈的荒野,看我儿子大学毕业。
Oh, next week, and then I I have two weeks where I'm gone because I will be in the wilds of Cupertino, and then I will be in the wilds of Oregon, watching my son graduate from college.
所以我要休两周。
So two weeks off.
星期二的节目雷打不动。
Tuesdays are it's inviolate.
你明白吗?
You know?
不管有没有人到场,我们每周二太平洋时间十一点都会准时播,所以我不会缺席。
We do the show whether there are people here or not at eleven Pacific on Tuesday, so I will not.
所以我会
So I
希望我们能找到合适的人。
hope We'll find somebody.
我们一定能找个人来接替这个位置。
We'll find somebody to fill the seat.
谁知道呢?
Who knows?
也许亚历克斯·林赛能行。
Maybe, Alex Lindsay will be able to
整个夏天都用来聊WWDC也不错。
to build whole summer to talk about WWDC.
这话说得有道理。
That's a good point.
克里斯蒂娜·沃伦在这儿。
Christina Warren is here.
但她下周不会来了。
Now she won't be here next week.
我不会去。
I will not.
我不会去。
I will not.
我会在GitHub处理一些事务。
I will relations at GitHub.
你打算搞个GitHub相关的活动吗?
Are you doing a GitHub thing?
既然这是微软构建大会,我下周会去参加微软构建大会。
Well, it is Microsoft Build, so I will be at Microsoft Build next, next week.
对啊,想起来了。
Oh, that's right.
是构建大会。
It's Build.
这可是大事。
It's a big deal.
开发者大会可很重要。
Build's a big deal.
克里斯蒂娜会来,但我也不确定。
Christina will be, I'm hoping I don't know.
约翰·阿什利,你请到谢莉·布里斯班来顶替了吗?
John Ashley, were you able to get Shelley Brisbane to fill in?
是的,请到了。
Oh, yes.
哦,
Oh,
太好了。
good.
因为我想聊聊下一代 iOS 的无障碍功能,谢莉是我们这方面的专家,本来想请她来讲一讲。
Because I wanna talk there's a whole accessibility story with the next iOS, and I wanted to kind of talk about, that Shelley is our accessibility expert.
不过,克里斯蒂娜,我们真会想你的。
But but we will miss you, Christina.
谢谢您。
Well, thank you.
谢谢。
Thank you.
不过我很期待以后作为听众收听节目,那一定很有趣。
But but I I look forward to tuning into the show as a as a listener, that'll be fun.
我会把你当成敌方阵营的人来想的。
Well, I will think of you, in the enemy camp as it were.
敌方阵营,是吧。
In the enemy camp as it were.
当然。
Sure.
当然。
Sure.
当然。
Sure.
在这种情况下,身处敌营本身就是一种惩罚。
In the enemy camp in this case is its own punishment.
现在他们更像是那种又像朋友又像对手的关系。
Now now it's they're they're I I feel like they're frenemies at this point more than anything.
我本来想说,确实,他们就是那种又像朋友又像对手的关系。
I was going to say I definitely feel like there's it's it's, you know, yeah, it's frenemy.
得了吧。
Come on.
那我就不提微软最近推送的那个更新了,它把不少高端惠普还有联想笔记本给搞瘫了。
Well, I won't say anything then about the, Microsoft update they pushed out that bricked high end HP and, was it Lenovo laptop?
说清楚点。
Be clear.
我从九十年代就开始用麦金塔了,我妻子当时领了一台Windows笔记本,偶尔会放在家里。
As a Mac user since the nineties, my wife was issued a a Windows laptop, and occasionally, it's hanging around the house.
每当我看到它,就直接收进包里,搁到另一个房间去,实在不想让它出现在我视线里。
And whenever I see it, I put it in its case and put it in another room because I don't want that thing out in my vision.
我不喜欢这个。
I don't like it.
但明理的人会说,微软和苹果现在都还行。
But reasonable people can say Microsoft and Apple are
现在确实不错。
fine these days.
没错。
It's true.
确实如此。
It's true.
我就是不想让这种东西出现在家里。
I just don't want that stuff in my house.
这东西。
It's
还有我们这儿的安迪·伊纳特科,他用安卓系统,所以从别的角度说,他算是个叛徒。
Also with us, Andy Ihnatko, who, you know, he uses Android, so I guess he's apostate in other ways.
你好,安德鲁。
Hello, Andrew.
我挺包容的。
I'm ecumenical.
我接受所有的界面。
I embrace all face.
克里斯蒂娜,我觉得你不妨下周试着从内部推动微软,不过其实微软已经在这么做了。
I I and I would say, Christina, that, like, I encourage you to spend next week, like, bringing Microsoft from within, but Microsoft is already doing that.
你这也太苛刻了吧。
So no You're just so mean.
你太苛刻了。
You're so mean.
对不起。
I'm sorry.
看《真实》
Watching Real
家庭主妇。
Housewives.
对不起。
I'm sorry.
不是的。
No.
挺好的。
It's good.
挺好的。
It's good.
但你并不是那些拿股票当报酬的人。
But, yeah, you're not the one who's paid in their stocks.
所以,别提了。
So, yeah, tell me about it.
天哪。
Yikes.
我得说清楚,股票本身没问题。
I should warn well, the stock is fine.
这倒是好事。
That's a good thing
在如今这年头能拿到报酬就不错了。
to be paid in these days.
我明白了。
I've got it.
对不起。
I I'm sorry.
我忘了,我忘了谁是主人,我一时想不起来了。
I forgot I forgot who owns I forgot who owns
完全没问题。
It's completely fine.
完全没问题。
It's completely fine.
我觉得这简直太搞笑了。
I think it's hysterical, actually.
说实话,我觉得特别棒。
Genuinely, I think it's fantastic.
请多做点这样的内容。
Please do more.
你知道的,微软这公司抗压能力很强。
And they you know, look, Microsoft has a thick skin.
这么说吧。
Let's put it that way.
得了吧。
Come on.
是的。
Yeah.
我们知道有不少微软的人在听这个节目。
We know many people from Microsoft listen to the show.
实际上,微软有很多人用的是Mac。
Are you are in fact, a lot of people at Microsoft use Macs.
我完全不反对微软的员工,包括GitHub那些出色的人。
So I don't I don't I have nothing against the wonderful people who work at Microsoft, including those who work at GitHub who are fabu.
不过咱们还是聊点别的吧。
But enough of that.
我可能有点较真了,因为教皇都发话了。
I guess I'm a I'm a little bit I have a a religious mindset because the pope weighed in.
哦,是吗。
Oh, yeah.
教皇这可是大新闻。
Big pope news.
教皇这可是大新闻。
Big pope news.
一开始我还以为他是以AI为背景,发布了什么教皇利奥十四世的声明。
At first, you know, I'm thinking he did this in cyclical on, on AI, Pope Leo the fourteenth.
一开始我还想,一个中世纪宗教领袖对人工智能有什么看法,关我什么事呢?
And, at first, I'm thinking, what do I care with what a medieval religion leader thinks about, artificial intelligence?
但后来我读了一部分,没读完全文。
But then I I read I didn't read the whole thing.
那篇文章有四万两千字,但我看了《人类尊严》的某些部分,觉得其实说得挺有道理的。
It's 42,000 words, but I read part of the Magnifica Humanitas, and I thought actually it was quite sensible.
它直击要害,说的正是很多人早就提到过的关于AI的问题。
It's very it's very to the point about what lots of people have already been saying about AI.
AI伦理学家们基本都在说:我们不能只造出一种只让富人受益的技术。
AI ethicists basically saying that, look, we can't build this thing that only benefits rich people.
这项技术本该有能力帮助所有阶层的人。
This has technology has the power to help all people of all kinds.
但如果只让最需要它的人承担代价,却得不到任何好处,那这根本不是我们该做的事。
But if we just simply make sure that it's that the people who need it the most are being are are paying the cost of it but aren't getting the benefits for of it, that's really not what we're put here to do.
我只看了前四五千字左右,不过我确实下载了全文。
I've only I've only read, like, the first, like, four to 5,000 words, but I did, I did download it.
我本来只想粗略翻一下,结果这东西写得特别流畅,一点都不过时。
I intended to just skim it, but the damn thing is just very readable and modern.
挺好的。
It's good.
真的非常好。
It's really good.
他还提到,顺便说一句,杰夫·贾维斯在他的博客BuzzMachine.com上有一篇特别精彩的分析。
He said, among other things and, by the way, Jeff Jarvis has an excellent analysis on his buzz machine, a blog, buzzmachine.com.
当然,我们明天在《智能机器》节目里还会继续聊这个。
And, of course, we'll talk about this, tomorrow on intelligent machines.
他说,教皇利奥——这名字我喜欢——认为,科技有能力治愈、联结、教育,还能保护我们共同的家园。
He said the pope, Leo by name, love that name, said technology has the power to heal, connect, educate, and protect our common home.
没错。
True.
对吧?
Right?
但它也可能造成分裂、排斥,甚至催生新的不公。
But it can also divide, exclude, and generate new forms of injustice.
确实如此。
Also true.
从抽象意义上说,技术本身并不能解决人类的问题,就像它本身也不是天生邪恶的。
In the abstract, technology in and of itself is not a solution to humanity's problems just as it is not inherently evil.
但在现实中,技术从来都不是中立的,因为它会反映出那些设计、投资、监管和使用它的人的特质。
However, in practice, technology is never neutral because it takes on the characters characteristics of those who devise, finance, regulate, and use it.
没错。
Yes.
我觉得,这正是我们在这里所持的态度。
I think this I think this is exactly our attitude here.
对吧?
Right?
它它它,抱歉。
It's it's got it's got I'm sorry.
我真的很期待这个话题,不过我会尽量把话说得简洁点。
I'll I'll I'm excited about this, but I'll I'll try to wind myself up.
这份通谕里有很多常识性的经典观点,比如有一份著名的演示文稿,我记得是IBM在三四十年前做的,那时候计算机已经足够稳定和普及,可以用来自动化各种流程。
It's just it's just there's so many of like the common sense greatest hits in this encyclical, including there's a famous famous slide deck, I think was IBM from like thirty, forty years ago when computers were steady enough and accessible enough that to automate process processes.
所以他们当时自己拟定了一系列关于如何使用这项技术的准则,核心是:计算机没有责任感,不能被责备,不能被施加负担,也不能被惩罚。
And so they basically came up with a bunch of their own encyclicals about how this technology should be used, including because a computer cannot have does not have a sense of responsibility, cannot be blamed, cannot be burdened, cannot be punished.
因此,任何管理决策都不该交给计算机来做。
That that means that no computer should ever be allowed to make a management style decision.
在通谕里,他也表达了非常类似的观点:我们不能让人工智能替人类做那些本该由人来承担的工作,因为它不具备人类的责任感。
And in the encyclical, he's saying he says something very, very similar about how, look, we can't allow AI to basically take the do the do the work of humans because it doesn't have the responsibility of humans.
它没有人类的道德根基。
It doesn't have the ethical grounding of humans.
如果谁还抱着相反的想法,或者假装事情不是这样,那只会带来极其严重的后果。
And that to think otherwise or pretend otherwise is going to lead to very, very, very bad things.
他甚至都没用拉丁文来说这句话。
He doesn't even say it in Latin.
他说的是清晰的英语。
He says it in he says it in clean English.
里面确实有一些拉丁文。
There was some Latin.
明白了。
Okay.
不过也不是全是拉丁文。
Well, it wasn't all Latin.
是‘Istimonis for abundance’。
Istimonis for abundance.
我说得对吗?
Am I right?
还有‘Troibo’之类的。
And Troibo, whatever.
对。
Yeah.
我的意思是,我觉得其实还挺合理的。
I mean, I thought it was it was actually pretty, reasonable.
而且也没那么极端。
It was also not, fire and brimstone.
你懂的。
You know?
他真的请了来自Anthropic的人来参与。
I mean, he literally had somebody from for Anthropic.
Anthropic。
Anthropic.
是的。
Yeah.
他们在提供咨询。
They're Advising.
来讨论这个话题,我觉得很合适,因为Anthropic一直都是AI公司里最有哲学意味的。
To talk about this, which is, I think, fitting because Anthropic has always been the most kind of philosophical of the AI companies.
他们花了很多时间,有些人可能会觉得这是在做营销,持怀疑态度。
They spend a lot of time, and people can be cynical about it and say that it's part of their marketing.
我觉得也许确实是这样,但我相信他们自己也真心这么认为。
I think that it may be, but I think they also do believe it.
我觉得达里奥·阿莫迪确实经常深入思考人工智能的意义,同时又一脚踩到底,全速前进。
I think, Dario Amode actually does think lots of deep thoughts about what it means to do AI while also pressing on his foot on the gas to go full speed ahead.
我觉得这两件事完全可以同时成立。
I think both of those things can be true.
让我印象最深的是那一段,我简直不敢相信,但话说回来,凡事总有第一次。
I thought the part that struck me of that, I can't believe it, but, you know, again, there's a first time for everything.
咱们来聊聊一个科技播客里讨论教皇通谕的事吧。
Let's talk about a papal encyclical on a tech podcast.
为什么不行呢?
Why not?
我觉得这正好触及了如今我们圈子里很多争论的核心——他说,仅仅因为你能用某个工具做好事或坏事,并不意味着它本身没有道德分量,我这算是转述教皇的话,反正我特喜欢这么说。
Was I thought and this this goes to the heart of a lot of debates that I see in our communities these days, which is he said, just because you can use a tool for good or for ill I'm paraphrasing the pope here because I love saying stuff like that.
如果能用拉丁文写,那就用拉丁文吧。
Do it in Latin if you can.
仅仅因为一个工具能用来做好事或坏事,并不意味着它就无害。如果这个工具本身本质上就是有害的、邪恶的,那么用它来做善事,也可能在道德上站不住脚。
Just just because a tool can be used for good or ill, if the tool is fundamentally ill, if it the if the tool is fundamentally poisoned or evil, doing good with it may not be morally acceptable.
我觉得我们很多人都在纠结这个问题:我特别不安于那些被用在数据中心和AI系统上的能源消耗,我担心这些会对社会产生各种各样的负面影响。
And I think that a lot of us are grappling with this idea of, like, you can have like, I feel very much like I am uneasy about the resources being spent on data centers and on the power that is used to power all of these AI, setups, and I worry about what it might do for our society in a whole bunch of different ways.
我也意识到,很多人用AI的方式是我反对的,就像教皇说的,有些做法简直是在背离人性。
And I also recognize that there are lots of ways that people use AI that I am not in favor of that I think are kind of anti humanity as the pope points out.
但同时,我也看到它在很多方面带来的好处。
But I also see the benefits in lots of ways.
比如,计算机写代码就是一项了不起的便利,这确实让我停下来思考——当教皇说,从道德上讲,如果你用的东西本质上就不对,那你只用它做好事,真的就能心安理得吗?毕竟,还有谁比教皇更适合谈这个呢?
I think, like, computers writing computer code is an amazing benefit for people, and it does, you know, give me pause when the pope says, look, morally, and who who better to talk about this than the pope, I suppose, morally, are you okay only using it for good if it's fundamentally not good?
这确实值得好好想想。
And, I mean, you gotta think about it.
我觉得这触及了我们讨论这个问题的核心。
I think that goes to the root of a lot of our conversations about it.
我一直在思考这个问题,因为作为一名科技记者,我觉得我们所有人都面临同样的困境。
It's something I grapple with all the time because, as a technology journalist, I think we're all in the same boat.
我这一辈子都在报道智能手机、数码产品这些东西,它们最后都进了垃圾填埋场,破坏着环境。
We cover, for my whole life, we've been covering things like, smartphones and gadgets and things that are filling up the landfill and destroying our environment.
而我们还在不断鼓励人们去购买更多。
And, we're encouraging people to buy more.
是的。
Yep.
就在我们的评测里,连提都没提,就已经在推动了。
Just in our very reviews without even saying it.
所以我觉得,所有接触科技的人,尤其是我们这些报道科技的人,都必须认真思考这种道德困境。
So I think there is a a moral struggle that all, people who, deal with technology, especially those of us who cover technology, have to think about.
我觉得这是个值得深思的问题。
So I think it's a good thing to think about.
我昨晚刚看完。
I just watched last night.
我昨晚看了一部特别怪的电影,戈尔·维宾斯基的新作,叫《好运》。
I just watched a very weird movie, Gore Verbinski's latest, which is called good luck.
别死。
Don't die.
要好运。
Have good luck.
别玩得太开心。
Don't have fun.
别死,这部电影讲的就是这个。
Don't die, which is really about this.
一个叫山姆·洛克威尔的人从未来回来,想拯救世界。
A guy Sam Rockwell comes back from the future to save the world.
他随身带着一个U盘,里面是未来人设计的AI安全软件。
He's got on a USB stick, AI safety software that the future folks have designed.
他说再过一小时,一个九岁孩子就要触发一个AI炸弹,毁灭未来。
And he says in a in an hour, a nine year old is about to set off an AI bomb that will destroy the future.
我从未来回来,就是为了拯救它。
I have come back from the future to save it.
有点像《终结者》的味道。
It's a little Terminator y.
我们得在那孩子点‘运行’之前,把这套软件装到他电脑上,这事儿简直荒唐。
And we've got to install this software on the kid's on the kids' computer before he presses the go button, which is hysterical.
整部电影讲的就是他们拼命赶去那儿的过程。
And this that's the whole the whole movie is them, you know, the the them trying to get there.
这事儿有点
It's a little
小得可怜。
tiny thing.
这产品禁止安装第三方应用,我们完蛋了。
Product and it forbids side loading, so we're doomed.
是啊。
Yeah.
不过,这部电影里有个特别棒的地方,就是有两个角色是高中老师,而学生们一整场都死死盯着手机,老师还问:这不违反校规吗?
Well, the other thing though that's great in it is that the kids, two of the characters are high school teachers, and the kids are literally glued to their phone the whole time in and the teacher's saying, is this is this against the rules?
你们不是应该把手机收起来吗?
Are you shouldn't you have your phones put away?
这其实是一种讽刺。
So it's a commentary.
这部电影既讽刺了人工智能,也讽刺了智能手机。
The movie is a commentary both on AI and, on smartphones.
说实话,我不明白为什么教皇还没就智能手机和社交媒体发布通谕,因为在我看来,它们的破坏性一点不亚于其他东西。
And, honestly, I don't know why the pope hasn't done an encyclical on, smartphones and social media because I think in many ways, it's just as destructive.
可我们还是这样,日复一日地用着。
And yet, you know, here we are.
我们总在谈论这些事。
We constantly talk about it.
在我的节目里,我也在很多方面推广它们。
I, on my shows, promote, in many ways, it.
我们都用。
We all use it.
所以我也说不准。
So I think I don't know.
我该觉得内疚吗,克里斯蒂娜?
Do we should I feel guilty, Christina?
说实话,我也说不清楚,我和 panel 上其他人一样,也在纠结这些问题。
I mean, I don't know because I I I go I grapple with the same things that everyone else on this panel grapples with.
对吧?
Right?
而且我还有个额外的角度——过去六年我一直参与这些技术的研发。
And and I from an additional perspective of someone who's been actively working on some of these technologies for the last six years or so.
所以确实如此。
And so there is Yeah.
AI 里头就藏着这些。
Embedded in AI.
你就是我。
You're me.
没错。
Absolutely.
对。
Yeah.
我本身就深陷其中。
I'm I'm embedded with it.
我知道,我上一份工作就是和AI打交道,接下来的工作也还是会跟AI有关。
I know that like, you know, my my last job was fair I mean, my my next job will be with AI.
我上一份工作就是和AI有关。
My last job was with AI.
我现在的工作也是和AI有关。
My current job is with AI.
是的。
Yeah.
我知道,这确实是实情。
Like, I I know that that's That's how true.
这一定会行得通。
That is going to work.
但你总会听到一些故事,看到那些裁员事件,不管是不是真由人工智能直接导致的,人们都把它当借口——我觉得目前来看,多半就是这样。
And then yet, you you hear the stories, you see the the layoffs that happened because whether it is directly because of artificial intelligence or people are just blaming it as, you know, a reason, which I think is more than likely the case so far.
但你也能明显看到,人们的预算分配发生了变化,因为他们在优先考虑某种支出,而不是另一种。
But you can also see very real places where people's budgets become different for different things because they're prioritizing one type of of of spend over another.
这其中还伴随着一种负罪感。
And there's there's guilt that's associated with that.
而且我觉得,人们也在想:我们该怎么确保它被正确使用呢?
And I think there's also thought about, okay, well, how do we ensure that this is being used the right way?
但我认为,我们根本无法确保这一点。
And I don't think that we can ensure that.
对吧?
Right?
我觉得,这其实是任何新技术最令人担忧的地方之一——你根本无法控制每个人会怎么使用它。
I think that's actually kind of one of the the the scariest aspects of any sort of new technology is that you can't really control how every party is going to to use those things.
你能做的最好的事,就是尽量让使用这些技术的人了解清楚情况。
And the best thing you can do is you can try to inform the the the people that are that are using it.
你可以跟世界领导人,甚至像宗教领袖这样的人好好聊聊,讨论一下道德和伦理上该怎么做。
You can try to have good conversations with world leaders and, in in this case, even, you know, clerics, about, you know, what the moral and ethical, you know, things should be.
作为人类,我们都该行动起来,别让自己在这些技术里迷失了本心。
And then we should all, you know, as as humanity, be taking steps to make sure that we're not losing ourselves in these things.
真正让我更担心的,不是那些末日预言,而是你听身边人说起,有多少人越来越愿意把脑子关掉——因为这些技术太容易上手了。
Because what bothers me more I think than than some of like the the doomsday prophecy stuff is just when you see and you hear anecdotally from folks, how much people are more willing to turn aspects of their brain off because these technologies are so much more accessible and are so much easier to use.
当你看到考试成绩下滑,甚至在自己日常生活中,也会想:‘哦,这事交给AI就行了’,而不是问自己:‘我能这么做,但我该这么做吗?’
And and when you see that, like, you know, test scores are going down and that, you know, even in my own just kind of like day to day life, I can think, oh, I can just, you know, do that with with with AI versus asking the question, okay, I can, but should I?
对吧?
Right?
这些,都是我们每个人都必须面对的问题。
And and these are all the things I think that we all have to grapple with.
我本来真没料到,教皇会就这事发来一份四万三千、四万二千——管它多少——的正式声明。
And so it is sort of a a I was not expecting a a 43,000, 42,000, whatever it is, you know, missive from the pope on this.
但我也不敢说这会不会真有什么影响,说实话,我对这个挺怀疑的。
But, I I also can't necessarily say that whether it will have any impact or not, and I I tend to be cynical there.
别忘了,世界上有一亿多天主教徒,他们
Remember, there are more than a billion Catholics in the world who
没错。
Well, yes.
不过,就算抛开我自己的怀疑态度,看到来自不同领域领袖的这种声音,还是让人感到欣慰的。
But but I but I think that even like putting aside like my own cynicism, it's it's nice to see this sort of weigh in coming in from from, from different, you know, leaders from from other worlds.
这些问题确实很重要。
These are important questions.
说得对。
Yeah.
也许我们并不认同他们的答案。
Maybe we don't agree with the answers.
我是说,我明白。
I mean, I know.
他讲不该用AI,这点我不同意,哪怕是为了好目的。
I I disagree with him when he says you shouldn't use AI even Yeah.
我觉得AI用在正道上挺好。
For its for good.
我个人觉得,所有技术本身都是中立的。
I think I'm more of the opinion to all technology is agnostic is
中立的。
neutral.
但他特别反感这一点。
But he hates that.
他讨厌中立派。
He hates agnostics.
我知道。
I know.
我觉得技术本身是中立的,好坏是由人来决定的,我们真正需要警惕的是人。
I believe I believe technology is neutral, and the humans are put the stamp of good or bad on it, and, it's the humans that we have to watch out
对。
for.
我更倾向于认同这种看法。
I am more inclined to believe that.
不过,我觉得还有一个更重要的观点,那就是并不是所有人工智能都必然源自有毒的树。
Although, I I do think that that there is a larger point there, which is I don't think all AI fundamentally has to be the fruit of the poison tree.
对吧?
Right?
我同意。
I agree.
让我引用一下圣经里的说法。
Bring in my biblical
这正是他在说的意思。
Which is what he's saying.
没错。
Right.
他是说,如果真是这样,那你就不能用不道德的技术去做道德的事,但我觉得这里还有一个关键问题,就是我们该怎么应对?
I I well, he's suggesting that if it is, you you can't use immoral technology morally, but I think part of the question there is also how do we navigate?
因为我觉得教皇并不是在说:看啊。
I because I don't think the pope is like, look.
把你们的电脑都扔进水里。
Hey, Put your computers in the water.
干脆直接走开算了。
Let's just walk away.
没错。
Right.
我觉得他的意思是,那些在开发这些技术的人,得想想自己做的事会带来什么后果,尽量谨慎对待。
I think he's saying build to the people who are building this stuff, think about the consequences of what you're doing and try to approach it.
对。
Yeah.
嗯,我同意这个观点。
Well, I agree with that.
你说得对,关于同意这一点。
Consent you're right.
就算某样东西有用但也很危险,你也不能因为有用就免责,必须认真考虑创造行为带来的后果。
Don't like, you're not absolved from making something if it's useful but also dangerous that you need to think about the consequences of the act of creation.
天啊,这里提到的圣经典故也太密集了吧。
Boy, wow, the biblical references are fast and furious here.
但话说回来,对吧?
But, right?
我觉得这一点真的值得提出来。
Like like and I think that's worth saying.
而且我怀疑这多少也受到Anthropic的影响,因为这种说法跟他们的风格太像了——我们怎么做才能既推进技术,又不变得邪恶,不导致社会崩溃,同时他们一直强调的是,如果我们觉得某件事迟早会发生,那它很可能真的会发生。
I I and I I also suspect that that's anthropics influence a little bit because that sounds very much like them, which is how do how do we do what we do but also not be, you know, evil and not bring about the destruction of society and and while also not, I think what Anthropic's point has always been is if if we can think that it's gonna happen, it's probably going to happen.
如果我们停手,别人也不会停。
And if we stop, everybody else won't.
所以我们现在要做的,就是继续往前冲,但同时也要想清楚怎么才能做对。
So what we need to do is keep rushing headlong into it, but also figure out how to do it in the right way.
说实话,我也不确定。
And, like, I don't know.
也许吧。
Maybe.
不过我觉得,有必要提醒一下所有正在开发这些技术的人。
But, worth you know, I I think it's worth reminding everybody who's building this stuff.
好好想想你正在做的选择,还有你对这些技术的预设,因为你应该努力以合乎伦理和道德的方式去创造。
Like, think about the decisions you're making and the assumptions you make about this because you should try to create what you're doing in an ethical and moral way.
我同意。
Agreed.
我本来没打算提这个,但现在真庆幸我提了。
I wasn't gonna bring this up, but I'm glad I did.
谢谢。
Thank you.
可不是嘛,教皇亲自插手咱们这摊事,这事儿可不常见。
I mean, it's not every week that the pope steps on our turf.
确实如此。
Yeah.
没错。
It's true.
我可不是每周都能碰到教皇通谕,看了真得说一句:太棒了。
It's not it's not every week that, like, I come across a papal encyclical and I have to say, damn it.
好吧。
Okay.
我得先把这放一放。
I need to put this down.
我得去忙点正事,不过我会留出时间。
I gotta get some work done, but I'll set aside.
我明天再回来细读,这文章真的特别值得一看。
I'll get back to it tomorrow because this is really, really a good read.
这东西就是这样,你放下又拿起,反复思考,然后再读,而不是放下就光想。
It's a it's a sort of thing where you just keep putting it down and thinking and then reading more than putting it down and thinking something.
有十一个实验室的人用吉多·西鲁奇神父的语气念给我听。
Have, 11 labs read it to me in father Guido Siriucci's voice.
这样我既能得到享受,又能学到东西。
That way, I will both be entertained and learn, educated.
我们花这么多时间在这上面,其实是因为这不过是暴风雨前的平静。
The reason we are spending so much time on this isn't really this is the drought before the storm.
苹果公司距离WWDC大会不到两周了,到时他们会公布手机里到底要集成多少人工智能。
Apple's, we're we're less than two weeks away from Apple's WWDC in which Apple will announce how much AI exactly they're gonna put in the phone.
而一旦苹果这么做,他们很可能成为未来最大的人工智能提供方。
And and by Apple doing that, by the way, they will probably be the single biggest purveyor of AI going forward.
对吧?
Right?
十亿部手机随身携带,这将成为人们接触人工智能最主要的方式。
With a billion phones in people's pockets, that's gonna be the number one way people access AI.
普通人用的才是真正的AI。
Real normal people access AI.
我说得对吧?
Am I right?
没错。
Yep.
你可以说谷歌,靠谷歌搜索,他们上周确实大力加码了AI。
I I you could say Google, with Google search, you could and they certainly, last week really doubled down on AI.
说白了,他们二十年来第一次彻底改了搜索页面,把蓝色链接换成了AI聊天窗口。
I mean, basically, they're changing the search page for the first time in twenty five years to be, an AI chat window as opposed to blue links.
是啊。
Yeah.
这显然是因为Perplexity这类公司用AI搜索抢了他们的风头。
That in response, of course, to companies like Perplexity, just kind of stealing their thunder with AI search.
而且他们每季度都强调,有数据表明,只要在搜索里加入AI功能,用户使用和互动的频率就会上升。
Well, also, they also they keep saying every quarter that they have data saying that, look, when we put I AI features in search, people were using were interacting with search more.
展开剩余字幕(还有 480 条)
实际上,使用量上升了大约11%,他们一直说这个趋势还在持续。
Actually, went up usage went up about 11% and that trend keeps they keep saying that this trend keeps continuing.
至于这到底能不能让谷歌搜索保持长久的吸引力,而不是把AI功能单独隔离开来,谁也说不准。
Whether or not that's actually applicable to making Google search into a continually relevant product as opposed to sandboxing the AI into a separate product or a separate environment, who knows.
但他们已经向自己和股东证明了,AI并不会摧毁搜索业务,更不会拖垮他们的广告业务。
But they've they've demonstrated to themselves and their shareholders that they don't feel as though AI is going to kill the search business and consequently the the their advertising business.
是的。
Yeah.
我就不回头讲我们之前聊的话题了,但确实有个观点值得说:我觉得传统搜索没那么有意思,AI搜索才更吸引人。我以前在Chrome里关了个设置,让每次搜谷歌都只显示经典结果,不碰任何AI功能。
So it's it's it's I won't I won't jump back to what we're talking about earlier, but sometimes we have that there's there's an art there's also an argument to be made that I think that search is not as interest classic search is not as interesting as AI search because I I turned I I had a switch turned off in my in my Chrome browser so that it would automatically every time I did the Google search, it would just give me the classic search, none of the AI stuff.
后来我不得不重新打开它,好测试这些新功能。
I had to turn it back on so I could test all this stuff.
关键是,它确实更吸引人。
And the thing is like it is more engaging.
你可以直接追问,不用再开新标签页、再搜一次,就能继续问后续问题或者相关问题。
You can have the follow-up question that would have been okay, alt and alt T for new tab, do a separate Google search for follow-up question or for a side question.
我可以说,嗯,这些信息基本是我想要的,但还缺了些细节。
I can act basically say, oh, well, okay, that information was mostly what I was looking for, but it lacks a nuance.
我这么理解对吗?根据你提供的这些信息和来源,A和C其实是成立的,我接下来会去查证一下。
Am I right in saying that this A, and C are actually true based on this information that you're providing me and these sources that you're that I'm gonna follow-up on?
没错,确实如此。
Yes, it is.
太好了。
Great.
而且还会加入生成式用户界面和生成式交互功能。
And it's also gonna be adding a generative user interface and generative interfaces.
根据主题演讲的说法,我们得看看实际效果如何,才能让这些功能更互动,更好地根据你查找的内容类型,以更易消化的方式呈现信息。
It's again, according to the keynote, we'll we'll have to see how well this works to make it even more interactive and basically to give you the information you were looking for ideally in a way that is easier to consume based on the type of content that you are looking for.
但问题是,你不能给什么东西都随便加糖。
But the thing is, like, sometimes that's you can't you can't sugar you can't dump sugar onto something.
也不能随便往里加碳水化合物。
You can't add carbohydrates to something.
这正是制作垃圾食品的方式。
That's how you make junk food.
这样吃起来更顺口,你甚至能一整天不停地吃。
Okay, it's more palatable and it's more you can eat it all day long.
但问题是,传统的谷歌搜索。
But the thing is, Google search, classic Google searches.
这里有一个资源。
Here is a resource.
这是我们觉得与你输入的关键词相关的参考资料。
Here is a reference to it that we think is relevant to the terms that you gave us.
现在轮到你点击链接,去阅读内容,评估来源,自己判断它是否相关,而不是让AI帮你消化所有信息,然后给你一个高度加工过的版本。
It is now on you to follow through to this link, read what is provided there, consider the source, and then decide for yourself whether or not this is relevant as opposed to having the AI digest all this for you and then create a highly processed form of that information.
还有一个更大的问题:如果你是像 Mashable 或 The Verge 这样的公司,你的内容全都被谷歌提前消化、咀嚼、吐出来,用户根本不用点进你的网站,你肯定不会开心。
Well, there's also the larger issue of if you're the company, your former publication, Mashable, or The Verge, and all of your content is now pre digested, pre chewed Charlie and spit out by Google without any traffic to your page, you may not be too happy.
没错。
No.
多年来,尼尔·帕特尔在《The Verge》一直呼吁的‘谷歌零流量’,他从来就没错过。
What Neil Patel at the verge has been calling for years, Google zero, and we're you know, he has never been wrong.
谷歌指向网站的链接数量一直在持续下降。
The references to from Google to websites keep going down and down and down.
问题在于,这些网站恰恰是谷歌用来消化信息的原始来源。
And the problem with that is that the websites are also the source of the information that they're chewing on.
没错,就是这样。
So They they are.
确实如此。
They are.
但我要说一点,这绝不是在怪罪谁——但很多媒体,包括Jason、Andy和我曾经待过的那些平台,明明知道是自找麻烦,却主动和社交媒体、搜索引擎勾结,拿了钱。
But I will say this, and and this is not in any way to to try to, like, victim blame, but a lot of a lot of publications, publications that Jason and Andy and I have all worked for purposely made their bed and got into bed with the social media companies, with the search engines and took the money.
他们拿了大笔钱。
They took a lot of money.
他们拿了巨额资金,而且明知道这种模式不可能长久。
They took an enormous amount of money And they took it even though they knew that this was going to not be a thing that would last forever.
与魔鬼打交道。
To deal with the devil.
确实是这样。
It
没错。
was.
但我要说,回头看看九十年代末、两千年初,我心里清楚得很。
But it and it wasn't as if like I I can look at like the the late nineties, the early two thousands and I can say, okay, you know what?
那时候你确实不知道未来会怎样。
You didn't know what was going to happen.
可到了2010年代,你明明知道会发生什么,因为你已经见过好几次了,甚至很多次都发生在你自己身上。
When we go into the twenty tens, you absolutely knew what was going to happen because you've already seen it happen multiple times and in many cases, it had already happened multiple times to you.
所以到某个时候,我只能承认:真的很抱歉。
So at a certain point, I look at this and I have to go, okay, I'm so sorry.
但如果你还在不断调整内容、算法、产出和用人,只为讨好谷歌、脸书、抖音那些平台,那当它们一变脸,你失去所有投入时,就别抱怨了——这一切,是你自己选的。
But if you're continuing to adjust your content, adjust your algorithm, adjust your output, adjust your hiring to please, you know, the people at Google, the people at Facebook, the people at what at TikTok, at whatever algorithm you wanna be at, you cannot be upset when that changes and when you lose everything you've invested in because you you chose to be party to that.
现在,是的。
Now Yeah.
完全抽身事外,真的不可能吗?
Is it is it impossible to completely detangle yourself from that?
是的,真的不可能。
Yeah, it is.
但你没必要像很多媒体那样深陷其中,刻意制造内容,不只是迎合算法,而是主动迎合算法,直接为搜索引擎和社交媒体平台驱动流量。
But you don't have to go as far in as many publications went in and got into bed and purposely created content not just to be serviced by the algorithm, but to be served by the algorithm and and to to drive traffic directly given to them by by, you know, the search engines on the social media sites.
我的意思是,这真的很难。
I mean, it was very hard.
想完全置身事外,实在太难了。
It's very hard to completely stand on the sidelines in that.
所以我理解,当你专注于搜索流量时,尤其是我在这段时期在出版公司工作过,你得在某个地方划一条线。
So I understand how trying to focus on search traffic, you know, and I I having worked at a publishing company during this period, you know, there there there's a line to be drawn where you're like, okay.
有很多人在搜索。
There's a lot of people searching.
我们想触达这些用户。
We wanna reach those people.
但我想说的是,随着时间推移,那些我完全不抱同情的公司,干脆放弃了真正的内容,转而全身心投入SEO垃圾。
But what I would say is that over time, the companies that I don't have a lot of sympathy for are the ones who basically gave up on actual content, and everything they started to do was just SEO garbage.
他们不再为读者写作了。
They no longer were writing for people.
他们写的每一篇东西,只是为了抓取搜索引擎带来的流量。
They were just writing to capture views that were coming from search.
你说得对,克里斯蒂娜。
And and and you're right, Christina.
某种程度上,这就像当年Facebook全面转向视频的翻版——人人都说要做视频,结果大家都跟风做了。
In a way, this is just a long playing version of the that Facebook pivot to video where everybody said do video, and they did it.
结果两年后,这股风潮就彻底过去了。
And, like, two years later, it was all over.
这件事拖了差不多二十年,不过没错。
This took, more like two decades, but Yes.
你说得对,某种程度上,这些媒体公司已经完全依赖搜索引擎流量了,有些甚至忘了怎么培养忠实读者,因为搜索引擎来的流量根本不是来自忠实受众。
You're right in in a way that you end up with these media companies that have just become completely dependent, some of them, on on search traffic, and they've also forgotten they they no longer cultivate an audience because search traffic doesn't come from an audience.
它只是来自谷歌,你根本不会有忠实的读者群。
It just comes from Google so that you have no loyal audience.
你又何必去培养忠实读者呢?
And why would you have a loyal audience?
因为你发的每一篇文章,现在都是为了SEO写的。
Because everything you post now is SEO.
有些人可能不太了解,你有没有读过那种文章,通篇都是小标题,全是些简单问题加简单答案,正题的答案却要拖到文章最后才揭晓?
And for people who don't know, like, if you ever read an article and you're like, why are there subheads all the way through it asking questions with very simple answers, and the headline is only answered at the end of the article.
那是因为有顾问告诉他们,这样写最有利于在搜索结果里排名。
And it's like, because a consultant said that is the most effective way to rank in search.
这根本不是给人看的文章。
It's not an article for people.
这是给谷歌看的,目的就是让你点进去,看那些你根本不会注意的广告。
It's an article for Google to get you to click through and see some ads that you also aren't paying attention to.
所以,我对像《The Verge》这样一直努力做对的事、早就预见到这一切的媒体,确实更有同情心,而不是那些你我心知肚明但不愿点名的网站——它们十年来根本不在乎读者,只盯着SEO。
And so, yeah, my my sympathy to somebody like, The Verge, which has tried to do a lot of stuff right and has seen this coming is a lot greater than some of these sites that that you and I could name but won't, where they no longer care and have not cared for a decade about their readers just about SEO.
没错。
Correct.
这正是我想说的。
And and that's what I'm talking about.
当然,那些被这波浪潮伤害的人,确实有人一直努力做正确的事,就像你提到的那样。
Obviously, are people who've been hurt by this, you know, and, you know, who are have tried to do the right things to your point.
但很多大型媒体公司根本不是这样,他们从没这么做过。
But there have been lots lots of the big media companies have not.
所以我对那些在这些公司里干活的人抱有同情。
And and so I have sympathy for the people who work there.
但对于那些高管,我的同情就没了——他们早就知道,十多年前就选择了走这条财务导向的路。
My sympathy goes away for the executives who again, it's been more than a decade where they've they've chosen to get into these financial relationships.
而且,正如你所说,他们根本不想去培养读者群体。
And and to your point to not build an audience.
这并不意味着建立受众就容易,实际上比以往任何时候都更难,根本找不到人看。
And that doesn't mean that it's not incredibly difficult to build an audience harder than ever and to and to to get found like at all.
这根本就不是个好做的生意。
Like it it's a not a good business.
这地方太难了。
It's it's a difficult place.
但说真的,看到这种情况,我觉得是你自己搞砸了,尤其是那些大公司。
But it, you know, I there's a certain point where I look at this, I'm like, but but you did this you did this to yourself, especially the larger companies.
你看那些大型报业集团,明明以前有话语权,却自己放弃了。
You know, I look at the the, you know, some of the bigger newspaper conglomerates and I go, no, you you you had leverage at one point and you chose to give that up.
有意思的是,The Verge 刚刚被卖给了詹姆斯·默多克。
Well, there's a certain irony in the fact that The Verge was just sold to James Murdock.
不是这样的,根本不是。
It was not It was not.
根本不是。
It was not.
The Verge 没有。
The Verge wasn't.
福克斯才有。
Fox was.
The Verge
The Verge
The Verge 是,它曾经是
is The was
The Verge 仍然属于原来那家公司。
The Verge remains at the company that was there before.
他们不会单独拆分出一家新公司,根本不会。
Oh, they're not gonna spin out a new company with no.
不会。
No.
但那些播客是。
But the podcasts were.
这真的让人挺糊涂的。
It's very confusing.
其实这是一个播客网络。
Well, it's a podcast network.
所以他们把播客和
So they Plus the podcast
《纽约杂志》绑在了一起。
in New York Magazine.
《纽约杂志》里的那个播客
The podcast in New
就是《纽约杂志》。
York Magazine.
那些才是当初被认定的播客,
Those were the ones that
还有Vox,后来也并入了播客体系,都被算作是那些播客之一。
were those were and Vox, which became as part of the podcast, were deemed as the ones So
The Verge 会继续由现在的所有者运营,
the verge is staying with its existing ownership,
基本上是这样。
basically.
对。
Yes.
没错。
Yeah.
我最近看到的消息是,Penske 要么全买,要么一点都不买。
And the the and then the the last I read was that they Penske will either buy all of it or none of it.
Penske 是最大的外部投资者。
Penske is the the biggest outside investor.
他们旗下有《好莱坞报道》《Variety》,还有其他好几家,比如《滚石》,他们可能把所有这些出版物一起收购,但只能全盘接手,不能挑着买。
They do, The Hollywood Reporter and Variety and and a bunch of other things, Rolling Stone, a bunch of other things, is that they potentially could buy all of the existing publications, but it'll either be an all or nothing.
不过这些都算是甩卖吧。
These are kind of fire sales, though.
对吧?
Right?
这些媒体的售价都低得多。
These are, being sold at a much lower value
这得看情况。
than It depends.
这得看情况。
It depends.
比如,詹姆斯·默多克收购了《纽约杂志》旗下的播客业务,就赚了一大笔。
I mean, look, clearly, one who got out a lot of money was the the Murdoch James Murdoch's thing buying Vox, the podcasting arm in New York Magazine.
是的。
Yeah.
还有一些是被那些亿万富翁收购的,你知道的。
There's those the ones who who there's the ones who got the, you know, the billionaire
这有点像《继承之战》里的剧情,因为
It's a little bit like a page out of the Succession TV show because
一直都是这样。
It always completely is.
他就像肯德尔·罗伊那样说:我爸那套传统媒体已经过时了,咱们得转向数字领域。
He's he's Kendall Roy saying, well, this old style media of my father's is dying, so we gotta go digital.
但也许选了个最不合适的时机转身离开。
But maybe picking the kind of the wrong time to jump ship.
我的意思是,从一个正在衰落的媒介跳到另一个同样在衰落的媒介。
I mean, was from one dying medium to another.
我真的不太清楚。
I I mean, I I I don't know.
我觉得詹姆斯·默多克,他算是默多克家族里比较自由派的那一个。
I think that the the James Murdoch, I mean, he's been, you know, he's the he's the liberal Murdoch.
他被赶出了家族。
He was cast out.
对。
Yes.
没错。
Right.
他离开了,之后就一直……
And he left and and and he's been Just
就像肯德尔一样。
like Kendall.
我跟你说,这事儿真是……
I'm telling you, it's
明明白白的。
straight up.
是的。
Yeah.
《继承之战》在某种程度上融合了派拉蒙和福克斯两家家族的特点。
Succession is a is a is a mix of Paramount and and Fox in terms of those those two families.
但他也投资过其他媒体公司。
But the, you know, but he's made investments in other media companies too.
我觉得接下来会发生什么,还挺值得期待的。
And so I think it'll be interesting to see what happens with that.
对吧?
Right?
他的策略是很有远见,还是有点跟不上时代了?
Is his strategy forward thinking, or is he stuck a little bit in the past?
我的意思是,他可能只是想保住《纽约杂志》,这我一点意见都没有。
I mean, might just wanna save New York Magazine, which I'm not upset about all.
没错。
No.
我挺高兴的。
I'm glad.
如果这意味着《纽约杂志》还能再继续办个几十年,那当然好。
If that means New York Magazine gets to continue to exist for another, you know, few decades, then, like,
那就干吧。
go for it.
我的意思是
I mean
我不在乎。
I don't care.
这有点像美第奇家族那种老派赞助方式——你有十亿资金,亏一亿美元养着一家主流媒体也无所谓。
That's kinda old school Medici patronage where you got a billion bucks and you can afford to lose a 100,000,000 keeping a a a kind of mainstream
这正是洛林、鲍威尔·乔布斯,还有我刚才想说的,爱默生集体正在为《大西洋月刊》做的事。
Well, it's what Lorraine and Powell Jobs and I was gonna say the Emerson Collective is doing with the Atlantic down.
《大西洋月刊》。
The Atlantic.
不幸的是,杰夫·贝佐斯当初看起来也是这么对待《华盛顿邮报》的,但结果并不是这样。
And, unfortunately, it's what Jeff Bezos looked like he was doing with the Washington Post, but it turns out, nope.
不是。
No.
不是。
No.
他更愿意把钱花在游艇上。
He preferred to spend that money on a yacht.
谢谢。
Thank you.
好了,咱们说到哪儿了?
Anyway, where are we?
咱们休息一下,然后聊聊苹果。
Let's take a break, and then we'll talk about Apple.
苹果。
Apple.
其实也没啥好说的,不过我们还是简单聊一聊苹果吧。
There's not much to say, but we will talk we'll talk a little bit about, Apple.
毕竟这是《MacBreak Weekly》。
It is MacBreak Weekly after all.
你猜怎么着?
And guess what?
我们有个Vision Pro的故事,这倒是个值得期待的点。
We have a Vision Pro story, so there's that to look forward to.
你状态不错,很高兴你来了。
You are well, I'm glad you're here.
你知道吗?
You know what?
关键是这样一件事。
This is the thing.
当一群聪明人聚在一起时,如果话题重要,就不该被局限在某一点上,我觉得这次讨论挺好的。
When you get smart people together, you shouldn't be tied down to any one thing if there's an important topic, and I think this was a good conversation.
关键不在于你把西瓜切得多薄。
It's not how thin you slice the melon.
而在于你怎么端上桌。
It's how you serve it.
是的。
Yeah.
你更喜欢用挖球器挖出来的瓜球,还是喜欢切成长月牙状的瓜片?
Do you prefer the melon ball, or do you prefer the the kind of the crescent of the melon?
哦,我更喜欢月牙状的。
Oh, I like the crescents.
我也是。
Me too.
我不是那种喜欢用挖球器的人。
I'm not a melon baller kinda guy.
感谢Andy Ihnatko、Jason Snell和Christina Warren参与这次对话。
Our show thank you, Andy Ihnatko, Jason Snell, and Christina Warren for that conversation.
你看,赶上淡季,我们连芒果都能聊上半天。
You see, on a slow week, we can talk about and mangoes.
你有没有试过先把芒果切开,然后翻过来,让果肉变成小方块,整整齐齐地摆在盘子里?
Do you like to do the thing where you slice it, then you turn it inside out, and you wind up with cubes on a little little serving curve?
没有。
No.
是的
Yeah.
真讲究啊
Fancy.
真讲究啊
Fancy.
是的
Yeah.
我喜欢在芒果上挤点青柠汁。
I like to put a lime on the, on the old mango.
我觉得
I feel like
这绝对不是什么委婉说法。
And that is not a euphemism in any way.
今天我们节目由CacheFly赞助,真的是由CacheFly赞助的,因为CacheFly就是我们的内容分发网络。
Our show today brought to you by CacheFly, Literally brought to you by CacheFly because CacheFly is our content delivery network.
他们已经帮我们稳定传输内容好多年了,快二十年了。
They've been keeping our content moving for years, almost two decades now.
每一次流媒体播放、每一次下载、每一个点播节目,CacheFly 都在后台默默扛起重任,从不惹麻烦,我特别喜欢这点。
Every stream, every download, every on demand episode, CacheFly quietly does the heavy lifting behind the scenes with no drama, no fuss, and I love that.
要是我们的推送出了问题,从来都不是 CacheFly 的责任。
If there's ever an issue with our feeds, it's never CacheFly.
他们真的非常可靠。
It's you know, they are absolutely reliable.
他们已经运营了二十多年,但一点都没停滞不前。
They've been around for more than two decades, and they are anything but static.
我也很欣赏这一点。
I like that about them too.
他们一直在不断创新。
They're always innovating.
这里有几件事你得了解一下。
Here are few things to know.
如果你正在为你的基础设施评估CDN服务,CacheFly的游戏下载速度比其他供应商快多达158%。
If you're evaluating CDN options for for your infrastructure, on CacheFly game downloads are up to 158% faster than competing providers.
视频对我们来说非常重要。
Video, very important to us.
无论在什么设备上,视频都能在不到一秒内开始播放,而且能应对大规模访问。
Sub second video start times on any device at scale.
这一点特别关键。
That's super important.
我知道当你访问我们的网页想看视频时,它应该立刻就能播放——因为我自己也是这样,大家都没耐心。
I know that when you go to our webpage and you wanna play a video, it should start up right away because I know I'm the same way we're all impatient.
等上一两秒,心里就嘀咕:不对劲。
Wait a second, and it's like, no.
这视频怕是加载不了了。
This isn't gonna work.
我还是换别家吧。
I'm going somewhere else.
所以我们必须要有这个。
So we need that.
即使在混乱的发布日,也能稳定交付软件,同时向数百万并发用户直播,轻松应对毫无压力。
Rock solid software delivery even on those chaotic launch days and live streaming to millions of concurrent users without breaking a sweat.
这就是 Fly 的实力。
That's Fly.
正如我所说,我们不断推出新功能,比如门户或可观测性系统中的高级分析,边缘端的程序化请求响应控制,还有 Terraform 集成,让你能用代码管理 CDN 资源。
And as I said, new features all the time, like the new advanced analytics for deep CDN visibility in the portal or your observability stack, edge control for programmatic request and response handling at the edge, Terraform integration to manage CDN resources as code.
所有这些其实也都指向了 AI,帮你更智能地管理运维。
All of that kinda also points to AI, helping you with the management.
我们在六大洲拥有超过 75 个节点,我猜他们现在连南极洲都在搞。
With more than 75 points of presence across six continents, and I bet you they're working on Antarctica.
超过五千家客户,我们就是其中之一。
Over 5,000 customers were one of them.
还有更厉害的,100% 的服务可用性保障。
And get this, a 100% uptime SLA.
百分之百的正常运行时间服务保障。
100% uptime SLA.
还有顶尖的客服支持,全天候工程师直接对接。
And the best support, twenty four seven engineer to engineer.
享受灵活的计费方式。
Enjoy flexible billing.
这一点对我们很重要,而且没有霸王条款。
That was important to us and no strong-arm contracts.
他们一直都很灵活,跟我们合作至今都是如此。
They were very flexible with us and have been all along.
CacheFly 是专为您的业务打造的 CDN 服务。
CacheFly is the CDN built for your business.
访问 cachefly.com/twit,了解如何免费使用第一个月。
Learn how you can get your first month free at cachefly.com/twit.
我到底说了多少年了?
How many years have I been saying this?
MacBreak Weekly 的带宽由 CacheFly 提供,详情请访问 cachefly.com/twit。
Bandwidth for MacBreak Weekly is brought to you by CacheFly at cachefly.com/twit.
谢谢 CacheFly。
Thank you, CacheFly.
谢谢。
Thank you.
马克·德国跟我们一样,也正愁没话题可聊。
Mark German, just as a stymied for stuff to talk about as we were.
不过他提到,由于欧盟的规定,数字市场法案将推动新系统支持第三方 AirPlay 替代方案,比如 Google Cast。
He did say, though, some interesting things due to EU requirements, the digital markets act.
据说,iOS 27 会原生内置对第三方 AirPlay 替代方案的支持,比如 Google Cast。
Supposedly, will build support into the new iOS iOS 27 for third party AirPlay streaming alternatives like like Google Cast.
以前我只能在支持 Google Cast 的应用里用,但现在这功能会直接集成到系统里。
You could use I mean, I've been I've I've been able to use Google Cast in Google Cast enabled apps, but now it'll be in the operating system.
德国还说,未来如果你想把视频、照片或音频从苹果设备投送到音箱或电视上,系统可能会默认使用这个方案,而不是 AirPlay。
In fact, says German, it could be the default if you wanna instead of, AirPlay, if you wanna beam video, photos, and audio from an Apple device to a speaker or TV.
谢谢,欧盟。
Thank you, EU.
对吧?
Right?
是的。
Yeah.
这确实有点晚了。
That's that's kind of overdue.
我很高兴看到过去一年半里,欧盟并没有强迫苹果在软件里加入特定功能,而是要求支持已经存在的开放标准,比如WiFi标准里的那些,现在这些都变得可能了。
I'm I'm glad to see just in the past year, year and a half, just because the EU has not ordered Apple to include support for x, y, and z inside your software, but simply support an open standard that already exists within say a WiFi standard, All of these things are now kind of possible.
像AirPlay、AirDrop这样的功能,现在都可以实现了。
All these things like, like AirPlay, or or or or AirDrop from from
没错。
Yeah.
谷歌现在也支持AirDrop了。
Google does AirDrop now too.
是的。
Yeah.
这些功能其实早就该实现了,因为这一直是个让人特别头疼的问题。
All these things that that really should have been able to do years ago because it is such a bone of contention.
感觉这种摩擦完全没必要——比如我的谷歌智能音箱,还有那些设备,它们的体验远不如苹果的智能音箱,文件在两台设备间传输居然还得看它们跑的是什么操作系统。
It's it feels like such an unnecessary source of friction that like, again, my my Google smart speakers, and my my that that don't work as well as Apple smart speakers that transferring files between two machines depends on what what operating systems they're running.
当然,我不是说欧盟的数字市场法案对每个应用都完美无缺,但像这种事让我愿意给欧盟一些信任,毕竟他们的监管确实带来了实实在在的改变。
And yeah, I mean, not that I'm not that I would say that the EU's DMA is always great for every single application, but it's things like this that make me give the EU the benefit of the doubt when it comes to regulatory stuff because it is making things materially different.
而且我也要说明,欧盟并不是硬拽着苹果走的。
And it's not and I will I will also say that it's not a case of them dragging Apple by the ear.
在苹果内部,一直都有争论。
Inside Apple, there's always arguments.
总有人会说:如果我们能让这件事变得更简单,会不会更好?
There are always people saying, look, wouldn't it be great if we did make this easier to do?
这对用户来说难道不是巨大的好处吗?
Wouldn't this be a great benefit for our users?
这对我们来说其实是个很简单的事。
And it'll be such a simple thing for us to do.
他们并没有被强行压下去。
And that didn't they didn't get shouted down.
只是他们的观点最终没被采纳。
They just simply lost the argument.
现在他们赢了这些争论,我们才看到这些改动能有多快落地。
Now they're winning those arguments, and we're seeing how quickly you can make these changes happen.
说到辩输的事,我们还在等法官伊冯娜·冈萨雷斯·罗杰斯公布,苹果在App Store里到底能收多少费用。
Speaking of losing arguments, we're still waiting for judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers to tell us, and Apple, how much they can charge, in the in the App Store.
这对不用苹果App Store的公司来说,会很有意思。
That'll be interesting for companies that don't use the, Apple App Store.
对吧?
Right?
这只会对那些不用苹果App Store、改用第三方应用商店的公司有影响。
It would only be for companies that don't use the App Store that use a third party App Store.
这是针对所有App Store用户的吗?
Would it be for all App Store customers?
这正是苹果公司正在争论的部分。
That's that's part of what Apple's arguing.
他们现在手里有好多事情在同时推进。
There's they're basic there there there are a whole bunch of different balls in the air.
上周,苹果和Epic向法院提交了一份联合文件,大致同意了时间表。
Last week, they, Apple and Epic filed, like, basically a joint thing with a with a court saying that, okay.
双方基本达成一致,苹果将提出一个适用于App Store外交易的抽成比例。
We have basically agreed on a timetable for Apple to at least propose a a percentage that they can charge for for out of out of App Store purchases.
这意味着他们将要
That mean that they're gonna be
而不是27%。
Instead of 27%.
没错。
Exactly.
简单说,苹果要在75天内给出一个具体数字。
Basically, say Apple's gonna come up with a number within seventy five days.
他们还得提供用来支持这个数字的数据,我们也有时间做出回应,这总算是有进展了。
They're also gonna give us the data that they use to to justify that data, and we're gonna have time to basically respond to this, but it's movement.
但还有一件事,他们正试图让最高法院和其他法院认定,这项裁决迫使我们在全球范围内修改苹果商店,而实际上,判决本应只适用于我们和Epic之间的交易。
But there's the second thing in which they're basically trying to get the Supreme Court and other courts to basically say that this order forces us to create changes to the Apple Store worldwide when actually the judgment only should apply to our dealings with Epic.
我们或许只需要在美国境内,或者在一个司法管辖区内部做调整就够了。
We should we should maybe be able to just make changes within The United States or within one principality.
这个法院无权命令我们在全球市场怎么做。
It is beyond the scope of this court to order us what we have to do in a worldwide market.
等一下。
Wait a minute.
这些事法院不是已经拒绝过了吗?
Did these things court already say no to this?
是的。
Yeah.
他们老是往最高法院跑。
They they keep going back to the Supreme Court.
对。
Yeah.
可他们又回来了。
But they're they're they're back again.
法院一再说了,不行。
The court keeps saying, no.
不行。
No.
去问问冈萨雷斯·罗杰斯法官吧。
Ask judge Gonzales Rogers.
你们干嘛总来烦我们?
What are you bothering us for?
我们这儿忙着呢。
We're busy here.
总之,苹果公司又重新提交了申请,试图推翻地方法院关于App Store禁令的裁决。
Anyway, yeah, Apple has refiled to reverse the lower court ruling on the App Store, injunction.
上次的回应几乎是立刻就来了,这次我们看看会怎样。
We'll see what no no the response to the last time was almost instant.
目前还没有任何回应。
No response yet.
对。
Yeah.
在影子法庭、快速通道上。
On the shadow docket, the rocket docket.
Epic公司已经对九到五公司就此事作出了回应。
Epic, gave a response to a nine to five, MAC, on all of this.
最高法院已经驳回了苹果试图推翻这项禁令的请求。
The Supreme Court has already rejected Apple's attempt to overturn the injunction in this case.
这次对藐视法庭令的挑战,不过是最后一搏,想拖延案件的最终了结,避免开放支付渠道,让消费者受益。
This challenge to the contempt order is one last hail Mary to delay a conclusion to this case and avoid opening up the gates to payment competition for the benefit of consumers.
法院的审理过程和苹果自身的文件都清楚表明,苹果故意设计出一种虚假的合规方式,来阻挠竞争,明显违反了地方法院的禁令。
The court's proceedings and Apple's own documents made it clear that Apple intentionally designed its sham compliance with the district court's order to prevent competition clearly violating the district court's injunction.
事实上,冈萨雷斯·罗杰斯法官说,苹果对她撒了谎。
And in fact, judge Gonzalez Rogers said Apple lied to her.
对啊。
Mhmm.
是的。
Yeah.
那就是所谓的‘是的’。
That was the yeah.
我的意思是,这才是最关键的部分。
I mean, was the biggest thing.
这是我读过最狠的一次当头棒喝。
That was one of the biggest SmackDowns I've ever read
哦,她气坏了。
Oh, she pissed.
在任何法院文件里都从未见过。
In any court filing ever.
那就是对的。
That was Yeah.
当时那文件一出来,我就说:好吧。
Literally when that came through, I was like, okay.
这简直就是那个大家总在转发的‘惊呆了’动图,真的太震撼了。
This is the popcorn gif that everybody always shares because this that was wow.
哇哦。
Wow.
是啊。
Yeah.
不过,不管怎样,我们会密切关注最高法院会怎么说。
Well, anyway, we'll watch, with interest to see, what, the Supremes say.
感情这事急不得,事情也急不来。
You can't hurry, love, and you can't hurry the
如果我们为Vision Pro这一部分定个主题,我觉得我们其实也该给Epic和苹果之间的这场较量定个主题,毕竟这周我们一直在聊这个。
If we, you know, if we have a theme for for for the Vision Pro segment, I almost think we should have a theme for the Epic versus Apple thing because we speak about just about this week.
嘿,安迪。
Hey, Andy.
你戴的是那个新的谷歌Fitbit表带吗?
Are you wearing that new Google Fitbit watch band there?
你展示的就是这个吗?
Is that what you're showing
没错。
off?
当然。
Indeed, am.
你就像那些F1车手,比赛一结束立马就戴上他们拿代言费的表。
You're like one of those Formula One drivers who right after the race immediately straps on the watch, the watch they get endorsement money for.
说说
Tell
而且举着
And holds the
对。
Yeah.
把那个举起来。
Holds that up.
不好意思。
Sorry.
告诉我们,是红牛吗?
Tell us is it Red Bull?
肯定是。
It's gotta be.
给我们说说这个。
Tell us about that.
其实,马克·古尔曼还提到,面对谷歌新推出的Fitbit手环的竞争,苹果在Apple Watch上可能有点安于现状了。这个Fitbit手环本身也在和亚马逊的Whoop手环、还有Aura戒指竞争——我戴的是这个,我知道你们不少人也戴。
This is, actually, this is the other thing Mark Gurman said is that Apple is perhaps sitting a little bit back on its laurels with the Apple Watch, in the face of competition from Google's new Fitbit band, which is competition itself for the whoop band from Amazon or the Aura Ring, which, I wear and I know a number of you, also wear.
说说这个 Fitbit 手环吧。
Tell us about this Fitbit band.
你现在不戴苹果手表,所以也没法比较。
Should is it now you you don't wear an Apple Watch, so you don't have anything to compare it with.
话是这么说,确实如此。
Well, but the thing is, that's true.
但另一方面,这款手环可能正是为我这样的人设计的——我用过 Pixel,也戴过 Apple Watch。
But on the other hand, it's possible that this band is made for somebody like me who has tried Pixel who has a Pixel watch, has an Apple watch.
但我平时不太愿意戴它们,第一是因为每隔两天就得充电,太麻烦。
I don't like wearing either of them day to day because number one, I don't like having to keep them charged every couple of days.
而且屏幕上总蹦出各种提醒,太吵了。
I don't like all the distractions that come through the display.
我觉得它们根本比不上我最爱的那几款卡西欧手表。
I don't think they're as good a watch as like my favorite little Casio watches.
我喜欢一天之内换好几次表带。
I like being able to switch things up several times a day.
就连我非常关心的健康数据,也让我提不起兴趣,因为它只给我一堆数字,却没有真正的分析或有用的信息。
The even the health stuff which I'm very very interested in doesn't really hit me because it's giving me numbers but no insight and no real information.
而且通常这东西还要三百美元。
And it's also a $300 thing typically.
这东西其实挺有意思的,因为它根本没屏幕。
This is really interesting because it really is there's no screen on it.
就只是几个传感器而已。
It really is just the sensors.
明白吗?
Okay?
这意味着它能提供像那些便宜款Apple Watch差不多的功能。
Which means that it gives you most of the stuff that a three like one of the cheaper Apple watches give you.
我能监测血氧水平。
So I get blood oxygen.
还能监测心率。
I get heart rate.
我能监测到低心率预警。
I get I get low heart rate warnings.
我觉得它甚至还能检测房颤。
I will get I think it even has a fib.
这个我可不敢打包票,别拿我说的去当依据。
Don't don't don't quote me on that.
但总的来说,光靠传感器就能提供非常广泛的健康数据。
But basically, a very, very wide range of stuff just from sensors.
它也非常非常小巧。
It's also very, very small.
它非常轻便,戴在手上完全不会让你觉得自己像个戴着各种电子设备的科技极客。
It's very, very you can wear it and you don't feel like you've got you've you've you've you've you're tech techno Joe with a million different gadgets on your wrist.
它很轻。
It's lightweight.
佩戴起来更舒适。
It's more comfortable to use.
这东西是上周一到的。
I this arrived last Monday.
从那以后我都没给它充过电,而且它几乎一直戴在手腕上没摘下来过,现在电量还有26%。
I have not charged it since and it hasn't been off my wrist really since And the battery is still at 26%.
不过目前让我特别感兴趣、也特别喜欢的地方是,虽然才用了一周,我打算再观察两三周再详细说说,这里我要用个不太喜欢的词,但新的Google健康应用里集成了Google Gemini。
And what I really but the interesting thing I've that I'm really really enjoying about it so far, this has only been a week, so I'm gonna I'm not gonna write about it for another two or three weeks, is that I'm gonna use that horrible word, but Google Gemini is part of the new Google Health app.
所以它不会只是简单地说,你比步数目标多走了10%。
So it doesn't simply say, you made your you you made your step beat your step goal by 10%.
这是你计划提升心率的七天里的第三天。
This is the third day of seven days in which you intended to increase your heart rate by no.
它会真的去分析数据,然后告诉你,哇。
It will actually, like, take the data and then have say, wow.
你确实把今天早些时候缺觉补回来了。
You've real you've you've you've really made up for the lack of sleep you had you had earlier today.
因为今天晚些时候要下雨,我建议你可以趁早去散步。
Because it's gonna be raining later today, I suggest that maybe you should take your walk early today.
试着把心率提上去吧,昨天散步你有点太慢了。
Try to get your heart rate up because let yesterday's walk, you were kinda you were kinda slow.
天哪。
Oh, god.
真让人烦。
Is so annoying.
其实也不是。
Well, no.
这些提醒并不是那种会突然弹出来的那种。
Well, these are again, these are not like alerts that come up on
你懂的,不是为了这个。
for that, you know.
我也不觉得。
I don't.
我也不觉得。
Well, I don't.
你不是最棒的吗
Aren't you the king of king
幸福之王?
of happiness?
我们一定得
We must have
只用一支桨划船,这可真没意思,里奥。
to simply row our rowboat with only one oar, and it's not a lot of fun, Leo.
好的。
Okay.
好的。
Okay.
拿着这个。
Have this.
总之,它给我的信息是我觉得有用且能行动的,我还能反过来问问题,比如它可能会说:根据你昨晚的睡眠,你只睡了六个小时。
Anyway, the the the basic the basics is that it gives me information in a way that I feel is useful and actionable, and I can actually ask questions back such as that, well, I I it might ask I I based on your sleep last night, you didn't get a lot of you slept for six hours.
你深度睡眠的时间不多。
You didn't get a lot of deep sleep.
你现在感觉怎么样?
How are you feeling?
你现在是有点精神还是有点累?
Are you feeling kinda up or down right now?
我当时就想,其实吧,我有点儿……
I was like, well, actually, I'm a little bit, you know.
好的。
Okay.
很好。
Great.
也许你可以两点或三点左右小睡二十分钟。
Maybe you can get take a twenty minute nap around two or 03:00.
那样可能会
That might
听起来这些建议都挺依赖人工智能的。
help It sounds like it's very AI advice focused.
没错。
It is.
而且它不是那种啰嗦的、堆信息的类型,它本质上是在帮你理解设备收集到的数据,而不是让你面对一堆数字或仪表盘。
And it's not again, it's not it's not gabbly and it's not like more information that it it's basically saying instead of this stack of numbers instead of these dials, it is basically helping me make sense of the data that it collected.
我发现它真的特别有用,帮我在健康、健身和自我觉察方面提升了很多,这些是以前的手表根本给不了我的。
It's I'm finding I'm finding it very, very useful and it's helping me get it's helping me with health and fitness and basically awareness stuff that I never really got from previous watches.
对。
Right.
而且只要99美元,价格很亲民。
Also, it's $99, which is easy to afford.
当然,你还能选各种不同的表带风格。
You can get, of course, a range of fashion.
不过得付订阅费。
But there's a subscription.
对吧?
Right?
是吗?
Is it?
大部分功能都是免费的。
It gives you most of it for free.
这跟Whoop手环之类的区别就在这儿。
That's that's the difference between this and the and the whoop band or whatever.
Whoop手环每年要300美元,但这个手环本身是免费的。
The whoop band's like $300 and the band is free, and that's every year.
因为我每月付20美元订阅Gemini Pro,那些高级功能其实我早就免费用上了。
Because I I pay $20 a month to subscribe to Gemini Pro, the advanced features are basically I I get for free because I'm already subscribing to to that.
不过目前我对它评价很高,因为这是我第一次连续一周每天都戴着健身手环。
But I'm very very positive on it for now because again, I will say that this is the first time I've had a fitness band on my wrist every single day for a week on end.
这也是我第一次真正认真看它给的数据,试着从中获取信息。
It's the first time I've been actually really kind of paying attention to what it's been saying and trying to get information from it.
我还特别想看看,刚设置的时候,它会主动跟你聊一聊,问你有什么目标,为什么戴这个,你现在的精力状态怎么样。
I'm also really keen to see when you set it up, it basically wants to interview have a conversation with you about what your goals are, why you're wearing this, what you're hoping to what your current energy level is.
我真的一点都不想参与那段对话,因为那会儿实在太忙了。
And I literally I didn't want any part of that because I was just too busy.
所以我干脆直接打字说:要不你先帮我盯着数据几周,等有了一些发现,我们再慢慢聊。
So I I literally just typed, well, how about you just like watch my data for a few weeks and then come to some conclusions that we can talk later.
他们回复说:好啊。
And they said, great.
这主意不错。
That sounds like a great plan.
我们就一天天看着,慢慢来。
We'll just simply we'll just wait by day by day.
我说:行啊。
And I'm like, alright.
这真是
That's I
就这样。
like that.
这我倒是能实际操作。
This is something that I can actually work with.
我不确定。
I don't know.
我一直在看一些评价。
I've been reading reviews
不过安迪,你可没法对老婆这么做。
Can't do that with a wife, by the way, Andy.
我只是想提一下。
I just want to mention that.
你能对老婆做的事,可没法对健身追踪器做。
All the things you can do with a wife, you can't do with a fitness fan.
这话说得对。
That's good point.
你还是
You're you're still
好吧。
Alright.
好吧。
Alright.
你这话把我难住了。
You had me there.
是的。
Yeah.
我再重申一遍,我显然不是那种会进行健身训练的人。
I will I will say that again, I'm obviously not someone who's doing fitness training.
我可不是在为半程马拉松做准备。
I'm not training for a half marathon.
我也不会做上万次重复动作。
I'm not doing a million reps.
它能识别你正在做的运动类型,并正确记录下来,你也可以手动在应用里指定,那段时间你实际是在做什么运动。
It will it will detect the kind of exercise you're doing and log it correctly, or can actually go into the app and and actually specify, this is what I was doing during that time of day.
我看了不少其他用户的评价,那些正在认真训练的人也都不意外地提到,这个99美元、没有屏幕的手环,对实现这种高强度训练目标帮助不大。
I've been reading other reviews and other people who are again in training and they unsurprisingly are saying that the $99 band that doesn't have a display on it is not great at like helping you get through these kind of serious training goals.
是的。
Yeah.
我会看手表,了解心率、当前心率区间,还有我锻炼了多久。
Look at my watch for my heart rate, which zone I'm in, how long I've been going.
手表会实时显示这些数据。
Mean, the watch is giving you a readout all the time.
是的。
Yeah.
苹果手表的另一个优势是苹果健身服务。
You can The other advantage the Apple Watch has is Apple Fitness plus.
你可以把训练内容直接显示在屏幕上,和手表同步使用。
So you can have that on the screen and tie it to that.
再说一遍,其实是通过应用来实现的。
Again, yeah, with the it is through the it is through the app.
你可以随时查看实时数据。
You can like get instant read of a
如果你觉得心率异常,
if you
可以打开应用,它会显示你当时的状况,之后你还能逐个查看应用里的各个标签,回顾一整天收集的数据和得出的结论。
like if you feel like your pulse is going wacky, you can open up the app and it will show you what you're what you're sub and later on, you can you can simply go through like each of the little tabs of the app to see like the data that it collected at the conclusions that it drew like throughout the day.
但我认为这不会是一款大众喜欢的产品。
But I do I don't believe this is going to be a general appeal device.
我觉得它更适合像我这样的人——我不喜欢用更多屏幕来解决我生活中已有的干扰问题,手腕上再加一块屏并不是我的解法。
I think it's gonna be for people like Like I said, I don't like having I don't like the the the solution to just the answer to distractions on the screens that I have in my life is not adding another screen on my wrist.
没错。
Right.
我已经很清楚自己想要什么了。
And I've pretty much defined that for myself.
我真没法天天戴着它,除非是赶特别忙的行程,那时候可能需要腕上提醒登机口变更这类事,但日常根本用不上。
I I cannot get myself into I I I there it's a fun it's a it's a useful thing to have if I'm having a really, really busy travel day, but I do really do need to have a notification on my wrist about a gate change or something like that day to day to day.
不过,它确实挺烦人的。
However, it's just a nuisance.
而且,我又忘了把它从键盘边拿走,电池很快就耗光了。
And again, eventually, the battery will run down because I left it on the next to the keyboard.
还有,这东西又大又笨重,我连续写了三四个小时,手腕被磨得不舒服,干脆摘下来了。
Also, because it's so big and so chunky, I took it off because I was writing for three or four hours and it was kind of irritating my wrist.
于是我顺手把苹果手表或者Pixel手表搁在键盘旁边,结果一忘就是两天,等想起来时电池早没电了,慢慢也就不再戴它了。
So I put I put my Apple Watch or my my Pixel Watch next to the keyboard and then forgot I left it there and then it's two days later and the battery's down and then I just got out of the habit of wearing it.
但这款不一样,戴着舒服,我根本没想过要摘下来。
Whereas this, it's comfortable enough that I really haven't had a need to take it off.
而且,我估计再过两三天都不用充电。
And again, I probably won't absolutely need to charge it for another two or three days.
不错。
Nice.
你的评测会在哪里发布?
Where will your review appear?
很快就会上线的一个网站上。
On a site that will be opening very, very soon.
这倒是个好时机,可以把上面的盖布拆了。
That might be a good time to to, to, take the the sheets off of it.
到时候自然会公开的。
They'll open up.
没错,就是这样。
That that's a yeah.
在那之前,
Before There'll
肯定会引起很多关注。
be a lot of interest in that.
确实会这样。
There'll be exactly.
应该没问题。
It should Agree.
我觉得现在可以了。
Be I think it's ready to go now.
我一直在跟安迪这么说。
I keep telling Andy that.
他总说不行。
He's like, no.
不行。
No.
不行。
No.
还没到那份上。
Not quite.
还没到那份上。
Not quite.
他是个完美主义者。
He's perfectionist.
我们喜欢
We like
这一点。
that.
他迟早会做到的。
He'll get there.
我本来想
I wanted to
说我觉得,得先把货架完全摆满,再请第一批客人来。
say I I feel like I just wanna make sure this the the the shelves are fully stocked before I invite the first
货架已经摆满了。
Well, they're stocked.
进店。
Visitors in.
它们都备齐了。
They're stocked.
我只是想说,十一年前苹果推出Apple Watch的时候,是把它当成一个应用平台来设计的,因为那时候苹果觉得所有东西都该是应用平台。
I I just wanted to say, you know, the Apple Watch eleven years ago was conceived of as an app platform because Apple sort of thought of everything as an app platform back then.
后来他们才发现,健身才是它最重要的功能之一。
And then they sort of found out that fitness was a major part of what it did.
说实话,我有时候会想,我自己也在用这个应用平台。
And, you know, I I do wonder sometimes and I use the app platform.
我遛狗的时候,就是用Apple Watch听播客。
I I am listening to podcasts when I walk my dog with my Apple Watch.
我用它做的很多事根本不是健身追踪,但我总觉得苹果在设计上有点偏差——他们没怎么下功夫让健身数据在手表上更直观地展示,或许watchOS真该重新想想了。
Like, I I use it for things that are not fitness tracking, but I I wonder if they made some mistakes that they continue to make in terms of focusing not enough on making it easy to see all of your fitness stuff on the Apple Watch that maybe watchOS needs a little bit of a a rethink there.
另外一点,我知道苹果特别高兴有这么多人喜欢Apple Watch,但我有点想不通,他们怎么就不觉得还有一群人根本不需要这么复杂的设备?这东西对他们来说太过了。
And then the other part of it, yeah, I think I know that they are really excited by how many people love the Apple Watch, but I'm a little bit baffled that they don't think there's another market of people who don't want an Apple Watch that it's overkill Yeah.
比如,一个更简洁的健身手环,虽然还是iPhone的配件——毕竟iPhone才是核心,它能同步到Apple Health,做所有健康监测,但只是
Where a simplified fitness band that syncs to your that is still an iPhone accessory, because the iPhone is the most important product here, and syncs to Apple Health and does all the health things, but it's
它支持Apple Pay。
It has Apple Pay.
而且,说实话,你得自己决定怎么用。
And and maybe I mean, you have to you have to decide how you wanna do it.
是像某些Fitbit那样有个小屏幕,还是干脆连屏幕都没有?
Does it have a little tiny screen like some of the Fitbits did, or does it have no screen at all?
我觉得,对于那些不想戴手表、或者已经戴了手表不想再戴两个、也不想换手表的人来说,市场上其实缺一个轻量级的附加设备,能做健康监测,还能延续他们的使用习惯。
But I feel like there's a product there for somebody who doesn't wanna wear a watch or has a watch and doesn't wanna wear two watches or change their watch, but they just want a little add on thing that does the monitoring, and it continues their story.
它延续的是Apple Health那种——你知道的,能救你命的整套体验,只是换了个形式。
It continues the whole kind of Apple Health, you you know, you save my life kind of stuff, but in a different format.
我觉得挺奇怪的,都十一年了,他们居然还没想过,除了把Apple Watch当主力产品之外,其实还可以出另一类产品:它戴在手腕上,能做所有你想做的Apple Health功能,但又不是一台全功能的腕上电脑。
And and I find it a little bit weird that eleven years later, they haven't considered that, like, they haven't changed the Apple Watch or bust approach to this feature because it feels to me like there's another product in there somewhere that goes on the wrist and does all of the nice stuff with Apple Health that you want, but isn't a full scale computer on your wrist like the Apple Watches.
没错。
No.
我同意,而且我觉得还可以更进一步。
I I agree, and I would go one step further.
我的意思是,要么考虑戴在手腕上,要么看看智能戒指市场。
I mean, I would say either on your wrist or look at the smart ring market.
对吧?
Right?
说实话,如果不想影响苹果手表的销量,戒指会是个很棒的配件——你们总不能说,我们只做一种戴在手腕上的产品吧。
Like, I honestly feel like a ring would be a fantastic accessory here if you didn't wanna cannibalize, you know, your potential Apple Watch sales because you say, oh, we are we only want one thing that's going on the wrist.
没错。
Great.
好的。
Okay.
可以做个智能戒指,让人睡觉时也能戴着。
So have a smart ring that can be something that people can wear when they're sleeping.
对吧?
Right?
不管我花多少钱买苹果手表,隔几年换一个,我都没法戴着睡觉,总得换表带什么的。再说我手腕细,再怎么劝我也不买那个巨大的Ultra,真的戴上去太难看了。
Because no matter how much money I spend on an Apple Watch and I buy a new one every couple of years, I can't sleep in it because I don't, you know, I have to switch the bands and whatnot, but because I have a smaller wrist and I'm not gonna buy the gigantic Ultra no matter what anybody tried like, no, it looks terrible on my wrist.
你知道,电池续航就这么点,你得每天摘下来充电之类的。
You know, like the the battery life is such that it's like, you know, you'd have to take it off and charge it every day and whatnot.
有一阵子我甚至试过用一块旧的Apple Watch睡觉,白天再换上新的那块。
And so I even went through the process for a while where I had an older Apple Watch that I would sleep in and then I'd have like my my newer one that I would put on during the day.
搞两块手表,还得都跟手机同步,想想就烦。
And that's annoying to try to kind of even have multiple watches, you know, synced with with your phone.
不过正如你所说,杰森,有些人其实并不需要那么多功能,但还是想留在苹果生态里。
And but there are these past experiences to your point, Jason, where people either have a watch they want or they don't want all those features, but they still wanna be in the ecosystem.
其实还有别的形态可以考虑,我觉得能更好地补充这些需求。
You have other modalities you could have that I think that would would really kind of reinforce things.
我觉得戒指会是个不错的设备,因为那样就不用带屏幕了。
And and I don't know, I feel like a ring would be a great device because in that case, you know, it it's not gonna have a screen on it.
也不用时刻跟手机保持连接。
It's not going to be one of those things that you're going to have to be more connected to your phone.
如果你真想更进一步,比如想随时看到通知,或者不带手机也能锻炼,那这种设备才真正适合你。
And so if you wanna go to that next level where you want to be able to really, you know, see the the alerts in the moment or or have a be have an opportunity to go on a workout without your phone, then that's the device that that you buy.
关于 Bayt 播客
Bayt 提供中文+原文双语音频和字幕,帮助你打破语言障碍,轻松听懂全球优质播客。