本集简介
双语字幕
仅展示文本字幕,不包含中文音频;想边听边看,请使用 Bayt 播客 App。
三万四千亿美元。
$3,400,000,000,000.
这是capital.com在2025年的交易量,得益于一个鼓励用户深思熟虑、稳健操作平台。
That was capital.com's trading volume in 2025, driven by a platform that encourages a considered measured approach from its users.
这个平台背后是多年的工程研发、测试和不断优化。
One with years of engineering, testing and refining behind it.
无数个小时投入到构建系统上,确保在市场波动时依然稳定。
Hours spent building systems that stay steady when the markets don't.
因为规模不是一蹴而就的,而是靠持续积累。
Because scale isn't built in a moment, it's built in consistency.
Capital.com,清晰交易。
Capital.com Trade with clarity.
差价合约涉及高风险。
CFDs involve a high level of risk.
81.31%的零售投资者亏损。
Eighty one point three one percent of retail investors lose money.
NFL赛季正式开打。
It's NFL kickoff time.
特邀体育商业专家迈克尔·奥泽尼亚,独家解读NFL各支球队的最新估值。
Exclusive NFL team valuations with sports business expert Michael Ozenia.
NFL无疑是目前最赚钱的联赛。
The NFL is by far the most profitable league.
想了解NFL各队估值详情?请访问cnbc.com/sport。
NFL team valuations now on cnbc.com/sport.
我的
My
目标很简单,就是帮你赚钱。
mission is simple, to make you money.
我来这里是为了
I'm here to
让所有投资者站在同一起跑线上。
level the playing field for all investors.
总有一个牛市在某个地方,
There's always a bull market somewhere,
我保证会
and I promise to
帮你找到它。
help you find it.
《疯狂金钱》现在开始。
Mad Money starts now.
嘿,我是克莱默。
Hey, I'm Cramer.
欢迎收看《坏钱》西海岸特别版。
Welcome to a special West Coast edition of Bad Money.
欢迎来到克莱默的世界。
Welcome to Cramerica.
别人想交朋友。
Other people wanna make friends.
我就是想攒点钱。
I'm just trying to save a little bit of money.
我的工作不只是娱乐,还得教点东西。
My job is not just entertain, but to do some teaching too.
打这个电话给我:180743。
So call me at 180743.
在推特上搜 Jim Cramer 关注我。
Tweet me at Jim Cramer.
如果你现在买股票,从今儿起,你就正式跟美联储对着干了。
If you buy stocks here, you are now, as of today, officially fighting the Federal Reserve.
这就是美联储决定像今天下午那样加息的后果。
That's what happens when the Fed decides to raise rates as it did this very afternoon.
第一次加息,幅度是0.25个百分点,会造成很多困惑,市场往往也会快速下跌,今天的情况就是这样。
The first rate hike, a quarter of a percent, creates a lot of confusion and often a quick dive, which is exactly what we saw today.
我的意思是,他们根本什么都不懂。
I mean, just they know nothing.
这就导致了抛售。
And that produces selling.
我们不确定是否会有多次加息,这对股市来说真的很糟糕。
We aren't sure if there's gonna be multiple hikes, which should be really bad for the stock market.
总的来说,我们会有一两次加息,对市场来说还不算太糟。
Overall, we're gonna get one, maybe two, not so bad for the market.
从目前的情况以及今天新任美联储主席凯文·莫里斯的严厉措辞来看,我们会多次加息,直到任务完成。
From the looks of things and the harsh words we heard today from the new Fed chief, Kevin Morris, we're gonna get many hikes until the job is done.
任务就是显著减缓通胀,这就是为什么道琼斯指数暴跌631点,跌幅达0.45%。
The job being slowing inflation appreciably, and that is why the Dow plunged 631 points just be lost point 45%.
但纳斯达克只下跌了0.01%,这算是一次不错的回升。
But the Nasdaq fell only point o 1%, and that was a nice comeback.
稍后会有更多相关报道。
More on that in a moment.
所以即使我在西海岸,这里的利率影响不大,因为科技股无论如何都会蓬勃发展,让我来解释为什么这个决定长期来看是正确的,但短期来看却很痛苦,以及如果通胀不回落,股市可能需要在今天之后继续承压。
So even as I'm out here in the West Coast where these rates mean very little because tech does thrive no matter what, Let me explain why this decision was right for the longer term, but miserable for the shorter term, and why the stock market may need to take a hit beyond today if inflation doesn't settle down.
那可不一定。
Big if.
首先,要明白这个经济确实有强劲的动力,主要是因为大型数据中心的建设。
First, understand this economy does have a real head of steam, mostly because of the great data center build out.
这些巨头在资本支出方面可是非常厉害的。
These behemoths are beasts when it comes to capital expenditures.
你知道吗?
And you know what?
我仍然认为它们会表现得很出色。
I still think they will be House of pleasure.
等加息的风波过去之后。
When the smoke clears from the rate rate hike.
看,它们确实在扭曲经济,但没有迹象表明数据中心的强劲势头在减弱,而且利率对它们的影响也不会太大。
See, they're distorting the economy, but there's no sign that the data center strength is slackening and rates won't impact it all that much.
对科技公司的盈利来说也是如此。
And that's true for tech earnings.
增长很可能会继续下去。
The growth will most likely continue apace.
就业充分,这对股市来说非常好。
Employment is full, which is fantastic for the stock market.
可支配收入很多。
Lots of discretionary income.
储蓄多,消费也多。
Lots of savings and lots of spending.
我知道我们一直在等AI摧毁工作,但现在这个周期正在不断创造就业机会,主要是贸易类工作,经济也确实在持续走强。
I know we keep waiting for AI to destroy jobs, but right now, this cycle is creating jobs by the second, mostly trade jobs, and economy does keep strengthening.
但建设也有真正的负面影响,这就是我们今天从Walsh那里听到的。
But there's a real downside to the build out too, and that's what we heard today from Walsh.
我们的经济不习惯动手干活。
We have an economy that isn't used to working with its hands.
服务业岗位占劳动力的三分之二。
Service jobs make up two thirds of the workforce.
当你有史上最大的资本支出周期,涉及今天美联储主席在讲话中提到的无尽债券发行和大量股票发行时,你肯定会面临过高的通胀。
When you have the biggest capital expenditure cycle in history, one that involves endless bond sales referenced today by the Fed chief in his speech and lots of stock offerings, you're gonna get hit with too much inflation.
美联储确实需要踩刹车,今天就是开始。
The Fed does have to pump the brakes, and that's what started today.
通常情况下,我们或许能应对这种建设带来的通胀水平,但现在不是普通时期。
Ordinarily, we could probably handle that level of inflation to building build out causes, But these are not ordinary times.
我们已经有了,你知道,我可以说相当严重的通胀。
We already had good you know, I'd say pretty predominant inflation.
我们现在的通胀率是3%多。
We're three and change.
从历史上看,这太高了。
That's way too high historically.
我们的新美联储主席是个认真的人,他一直致力于到2029年将利率降至2%。
Our new fed chief is a serious person, and he's been on bringing the rate down to 2% by 2029.
尽管特朗普总统选他来降息,但他知道我们需要控制通胀,以保持美元的购买力和你的储蓄的净值。
Even though president Trump picked him to cut rates, well, he he knows that we need to keep inflation down to preserve the buying power of the dollar and the net worth of your savings.
有两件事让这里的生活变得更艰难了。
There are two things making worse as life difficult here.
第一件是人祸,也就是油价持续飙升。
The first is man made, the relentless run-in oil prices.
你可以说,等跟伊朗的战争结束了,通胀就会降下来。
You could say that when the war with Iran ends, inflation will go down.
但谁知道这仗到底啥时候能打完呢?
But who the heck knows when it'll end?
话说回来,高油价持续的时间越长,就越容易固化在体系里。
If anything, longer higher oil prices last, the more likely it embeds itself in the system.
这会让所有东西都变贵。
It makes everything expensive.
油价上涨的成本最终都会转嫁到消费者身上。
Oil prices are passed on to you, the consumer.
美联储除非把利率提高到让我们连开车都负担不起的程度,否则改变不了这个局面。
The Fed can't change that unless it raises rates to the point where we can't afford to drive as much.
我们不需要开车,因为我们都失业了,或者因为我们不会花那么多钱。
We don't need to drive because we all lose our jobs or because we don't spend that much.
我觉得我们不会到那一步。
I don't think we're gonna reach that point.
但油价持续上涨的时间越长,我们越有可能看到更多的加息。
But the longer oil stays up, the more likely it is that we'll see more rate hikes.
而且从现在开始的每一次加息,都会对股市造成打击。
And every hike from here, well well, it'll be something that's gonna knock down stocks.
通货膨胀的另一个来源才是真正的难题。
The other spread of inflation is the real bear.
那就是印钞机。
The printing press.
我们的预算赤字明显不理想。
We're running distinctly suboptimal budget deficit.
总统和国会似乎都不在乎。
Neither the president nor congress seems to care.
我们州长的利息支出就高达一万亿美元。
Our governor has a trillion dollars in interest expense alone.
这太可怕了。
That's hideous.
像沃尔什这样认真的人不希望印钞,因为印钞会导致通货膨胀。
A serious person like Walsh doesn't want the presses to print because printing money is inflationary.
我觉得如果他能的话,他会把印钞机砸了,但这超出了美联储的控制范围。
I think he'd smash them if he could, but that's beyond the Fed's control.
美联储能做的只有加息,直到国会和总统认真对待支出问题。
All it can do is raise rates until congress and the president gets serious about spending.
如果他们真的这么做了,那可要小心了。
If they did, look out.
那将是极好的。
That would be fantastic.
当你加息时,经济就会放缓。
When you raise rates, the economy slows.
要是能回到印钞机那套,帮把通胀压下来,股市就能涨。
If you can come back to printing presses and help keep inflation down, stocks can go up.
但能把总统给按住吗?
But can it keep the president down?
我知道华盛顿那边在做正确的事。
I know that Washington's doing what's right.
可万一总统彻底失控了怎么办?
But what happens when the president goes ballistic?
他可能就像……你知道的,像一群AI智能体一样渗透进墙壁。
He could be about you know, he might be like a a swarm of AI agents penetrating the walls.
我抱住他的脸。
I hug him face.
说到底,我觉得总统说什么其实不重要,因为沃尔什是个非常较真的人。
In the end, I don't think it matters what the president says because Warsh is such a gamer.
他心里清楚自己想要什么,而这未必对商业或股市有利。
He knows what he wants, and it isn't necessarily good for business or the stock market.
我们对此是认真的。
We're serious about this.
他曾经说过,我们对此是认真的。
He said at one point, we're serious about this.
我喜欢这一点。
I like that.
我觉得现在没有人,尤其是总统,会怀疑这一点。
I don't think anyone, especially the president, doubts now.
我希望沃什的皮像钨一样硬,因为他会需要的。
I hope Warsh has skin like tungsten because he gonna need it.
美联储收紧政策时,所有股票都会下跌吗?
Do all stocks go down when the Fed tightens?
对很多人来说,股市就像债券、房地产、美元一样,是一种商品。
For many, the stock market's commodity like bonds, like real estate, like the dollar.
当你学会做专业的资金管理者时,你会意识到美联储可以限制信贷创造。
When you learn to be a professional money manager, you recognize that the Fed can crimp credit creation.
美联储主席提到,那些超大规模科技公司可能会挤占大量借款人的空间。
Fed chief reference to the hyperscalers as companies that can crowd out a lot of borrowers.
你提高利率,就能把信贷的阀门关掉。
You raise rates, you can shut the spickle off.
所以有些经理被教导说,一旦美联储收紧政策,就要卖出所有股票、转持现金,因为经济放缓时就得抛售股票。
So there are managers who are taught to sell all stocks when the Fed tightens and go into cash because you sell stocks when the economy slows.
沃什已经明确表示,这就是他们的计划。
Walsh made it clear that's the plan.
今天大部分时间都在抛售,直到尾盘科技股才反弹。
That selling crushes today until tech rallied at the end of the day.
但也有其他经理建议坚持原有策略。
But there are other managers who say stay the course.
我会挑选那些无论利率如何变化都能表现良好的公司,比如制药行业。
I'm picking the stocks of companies that could do well regardless of what happens with interest rates like pharma.
像科技股这类资产,你也可以考虑配置一些。
There are other things you can do okay here like tech.
然后还有其他的,金融、零售、旅游、休闲,还有很多其他行业,都不太景气。
And then there's the rest, financials, retail, travel, leisure, so many others, all not so hot.
之前其他行业占比还小。
The rest before this was small.
很多股票在涨,其他行业占比小,但只要通胀和评级持续高企,这个差距就会越来越大。
Lots of stocks going higher, the rest small, but it's gonna keep growing and growing and growing as long as inflation ratings and ratings stay high.
所以我觉得,现在找好股票越来越难了。
So there's I just say it's just harder and harder to find good stocks.
我希望沃什的评论能对债券市场产生影响,但债券市场一直很糟糕,利率不断上涨。
I hope the washes comments might have come to the bond market, has been terrible with rates going up relentlessly.
没有。
Nope.
在美联储主席讲话之前,利率一直在下降,但之后利率反转,大幅上涨。
Interest rates were going down before the fed chief started talking, and then they reversed and went up bad.
而且,这又导致我们能买的股票更少了。
And, again, another thing that gives us fewer stocks to buy.
说到底,我觉得美联储主席表现出魄力是好事,但对大多数股票来说,短期内不是什么好消息。
Ultimately, I think I I like it when the Fed chief shows gumption, but it's not good for the near term for most stocks.
长期来看,这很关键,因为能防止通胀失控。
Long term, it's essential because it prevents runaway inflation.
不过现在,你看。
For now, though, look.
如果你想像我管理旅行信托那样管理资金,可以关注CNBC投资俱乐部。
If you're trying to manage money like I do with my travel trust, you can follow along at CNBC investing club.
现在能买的股票少了,能持有的也少了,但该卖的却多了。
There are fewer stocks to buy, fewer to hold, more stocks to sell.
沃尔什是想让我们今天亏钱吗?
Did Walsh want us to lose money today?
不是。
No.
但就通信行业而言,他的意思是希望尽可能少的股票上涨,对很多人来说,确实赚钱更难了,而且从现在起,借钱赚钱可能会成为罪过,如果之前还不算的话。
But whereas comms interpreters meaning he wants as few stocks as possible going higher, for many, yes, makes it harder to make money, and making money with borrowed money is gonna be a sin from now on, if it weren't already.
但就像我在节目结尾常说的,总会有牛市在某个地方出现。
But there's always a bull market somewhere, as I say at the at the end of the show.
我们只需要找到一两个即使在这种环境下也能蓬勃发展的板块。
We just need to find one or two sectors that can thrive even in this environment.
这更难,但并非不可能。
It's harder, but it can be done.
我以前就做到过。
I've done it before.
希望我们能再次做到。
I hope we can do it again.
说到底,我认为买家会回来的,尤其是科技股,因为它不受利率周期影响。
The bottom line, I think the buyers will come back, especially the tech because it's not on a rate cycle.
它处于工业革命周期。
It's on an industrial revolution cycle.
但只要凯文·沃尔什还在大动干戈,很多板块就是不行,而沃尔什现在确实在大动干戈。
But a lot of groups simply don't work as long as Kevin Walsh is on the warpath, and Walsh is definitely on the warpath.
我们接听密苏里州杰瑞的电话。
Let's go to Jerry in Missouri.
杰瑞。
Jerry.
嘿,吉姆。
Hey, Jim.
谢谢你接听我的电话。
Thanks for taking my call.
当然。
Absolutely.
怎么了?
What's happening?
嗯,吉姆,我只是想知道,你经常和交易员迈克尔通话。
Well, Jim, just wondering, you talked to Michael in trader often.
我只是想知道你觉得科里会不会很快有所突破。
I was just wondering if you think Corey's gonna break out anytime soon.
好的。
Okay.
所以Corey现在面临一个两难的局面。
So Corey's got a a yin and yang here.
它借了很多钱,如果美联储开始加息,那就会更难了。
It's borrowing a lot of money, and that's gonna be harder now if the fed starts, raising rates.
但它正好处在工业大建设的热潮中心。
But it's smack in the middle of the great industrial build out.
所以我觉得买入还是可以的。
And so therefore, I think it's going to be okay to buy.
但风险变得更大了。
But it's become more speculative.
随着美联储加息,这个情况变得更加投机。
As the Fed raises rates, it's become a more speculative situation.
你得考虑清楚,因为那可能不是你真正想要的。
And you gotta think about that because that may not be what you really want.
我们接一下佛罗里达的杰瑞。
Let's go to Jerry in Florida, please.
杰瑞。
Jerry.
嗨,吉姆。
Hi, Jim.
我想问的公司是雷神,RTX。
Company I'm wondering about is Raytheon, r t x.
雷神现在怎么样了?
What's going on with Raytheon?
好的。
Okay.
情况是这样的。
Here's what's happening.
我们一直在关注那些市盈率很高的公司,并且一直在缩减它们的规模。
We've been looking at companies that have high high priced earnings multiples, and we've been shrinking them.
随着美联储加息,人们为盈利支付的倍数会下降。
As the Fed raises rates, the multiple that people pay for earnings will go down.
目前它的市盈率是27倍。
Right now, it's 27 times earnings.
在美联储加息的周期里,这个市盈率——这也是我写那本书专门讲市盈率的原因——必须得降下来,这就是这只股票下跌的原因。
In a rate cycle where the Fed is raising rates, that PE multiple, which is why I wrote my whole book about PE multiples, that has to come down and that's why that stock is going lower.
好的。
Alright.
听我说。
Listen to me.
买家会回来的,但他们不会回到原来的位置了。
Buyers will come back, but they won't come back to the same place.
记住,从现在开始,我们要跟美联储对着干。
And remember, from now on, we're fighting the Fed.
老兄,今晚网络股在这个市场上处境很独特,毕竟现在大家对AI安全的担忧情绪很重。
Well, man, right tonight, the cyber stocks are unique in position in this market with all the funk of AI safety.
他们并没有跟着美联储的节奏走。
They're not they're not dancing to the Fed.
接下来我会和阿尔托网络(Alto Networks)坐下来深入聊聊,看看这家公司是如何保持领先优势的。
I'm gonna sit down and follow out with Alto Networks to find out how the company is staying ahead of the game.
然后是关于ARM控股,它可能正处于一场持续多年的芯片短缺危机的中心。
Then ARM Holdings is the center of what could be a multi year chip shortage.
我刚刚从这家公司的CEO那里拿到了最新消息。
I'm getting the latest from the company's CEO.
Okta终于摆脱了对AI替代的担忧,开始真正摸清那些恶意代理的情况了。
And Okta has finally broken free of the AI displacement fears and is really starting to get a bead on the bad agents.
我联系到了他们的CEO。
I've got the CEO.
继续收看克拉默的节目。
Stay with Cramer.
不要错过《Mad Money》的每一秒。
Don't miss a second of mad money.
在X平台上关注吉姆·克莱默。
Follow at Jim Cramer on x.
有问题吗?
Have a question?
给克莱默发推文。
Tweet Cramer.
加上话题标签MadMentions。
Hashtag mad mentions.
给Jim发封邮件到madmoney@CNBC.com,或者拨打180743联系我们。
Send Jim an email to madmoney@CNBC.com, or give us a call at 180743.
错过了什么精彩内容?
Missed something?
请访问madmoney.cnbc.com。
Head to madmoney.cnbc.com.
你之所以会反复收听某些播客,是有原因的。并不是因为每期节目都 groundbreaking(具有开创性),而是因为质量始终如一。
There's a reason you return to certain podcasts, not because every episode is groundbreaking, but because the quality is consistent.
同样的开场,同样的声音,同样的水准。
The same intro, the voice, same standard.
这种熟悉感并不无聊,反而让人安心。
That familiarity isn't boring, it's dependable.
一个交易平台也可以给人这种感觉。
A trading platform can feel like that.
即使市场动荡,它的结构依然稳固。
Steady in its structure even when markets aren't.
Capital.com,无论市场状况如何,始终清晰明了。
Capital.com Clarity regardless of market conditions.
差价合约涉及高风险。
CFDs involve a high level of risk.
81.31%的散户投资者会亏损。
Eighty one point three one percent of retail investors lose money.
与体育商业专家迈克尔·奥泽尼亚一起,独家解读NFL球队估值。
Exclusive NFL team valuations with sports business expert Michael Ozenia.
NFL绝对是利润最高的联赛。
The NFL is by far the most profitable league.
NFL球队估值现在可以在cnbc.com/sport上查看。
NFL team valuations now on cnbc.com/sport.
这周我来到斯坦福,正好赶上大家都在讨论需要放慢AI开发速度,防止智能体失控。
I came out to Stanford this week right as everybody started talking about the need to slow down AI development, prevent agents from running wild.
但归根结底,我觉得这个问题说到底就是良好的网络安全卫生。
But in the end, I think this whole issue comes down to great hygiene cybersecurity.
所以我想跟Palo Alto Networks聊聊,这家网络安全领域的领导者,我们为旅行信托持有它的股票。
And that's why I wanna check-in with Palo Alto Networks, the cybersecurity leader that we own for the travel trust.
这周Palo Alto的股价大涨,迅速飙升了14%,因为华尔街终于意识到,没有同样强大的网络安全,就不可能有强大的AI。
This week, Palo Alto stock caught fire up a quick 14% because Wall Street finally recognizes that you can't have powerful AI without equally powerful cybersecurity.
别光听我说。
Don't take it from me.
让我们跟Nikesh Arora深入聊聊,他是Palo Alto Networks的董事长兼CEO,也是当前形势和其他许多方面的专家。
Let's dig deep with Nikesh Arora, the chairman and CEO of Palo Alto Networks and an expert on what's happening right now and many other things.
阿罗拉先生,欢迎回到《金钱》节目。
Mister Arora, welcome back to Man Money.
吉姆,很高兴见到你。
Nice to see you, Jim.
你
How are
怎么样?
you?
哦,我很好,尼凯什。
Oh, good, Nikesh.
你看。
Look.
我们有达里奥。
We've got Dario.
是的。
Yes.
我们可以信任那些只知其一的人。
We can trust first name people.
达里奥在谈论如何把控前沿节奏。
Dario talking about pacing the frontier.
然后尼凯什说这种节奏感是一种忍者般的策略。
And then we have Nikesh talking about the pacing is a ninja move.
这到底是什么意思?
What does that mean?
Jim,我一直很认真地听大家关于该怎么做的那些讨论。
Well, Jim, I've been listening very carefully to all the rhetoric about what should happen.
比如是不是应该放慢AI的发展速度,以及AI会带来哪些负面影响?
Should AI be slowed down and what are the bad effects of AI?
AI确实是一项令人惊叹的技术。
AI is an amazing technology.
我觉得我们面前正面临一个千载难逢的机会,去拥抱这项将对各行各业产生巨大影响的技术。
I think what we have in front of us is once in a lifetime opportunity to embrace something that is so going to be so impactful across the board.
我也没觉得它会慢下来。
And I don't see how it's going to slow down.
我看研究人员也没谁不想赢的。
I don't see researchers not wanting to win.
就像我之前说的,我还没见过哪个竞技项目里有人跳出来说,哎,等等,咱们先歇会儿吧,因为得放慢速度。
As I've said, there is no competitive sport where I found people saying, oh, wait a minute.
一起缓一缓,毕竟得降降温。
Let's all take a break together because we should slow it down.
我觉得正确的讨论方向应该是,我们如何确保能利用AI的全部力量去做好事、出于善意的目的?
I think the right conversation is how do we make sure all the power of AI can be harnessed for the right reasons and for good?
这才是我们应该探讨的话题。
And that's the conversation that should be had.
我认为关键的讨论在于,怎样确保AI能够安全、可靠地落地应用,从而让我们用它来造福社会?
I think the right conversation is how do you make sure that AI can be delivered safely and securely so we can use it for good things?
这才是值得深入交流的议题。
That's the conversation to have.
我觉得那种对AI感到恐惧、应该等待、应该放慢速度的想法,跟实际会发生的事情是完全背道而驰的。
I think the idea that we should be fearful of AI and we should wait and we should slow down, It's just antithetical to what's gonna happen.
所以现在是时候进行真正的对话了。
So it's about time to have the real conversation.
嗯,会不会太悲观了,觉得这就像一场赛车比赛,他们挥动黄旗,然后没人被允许……
Well, is it too cynical to think that perhaps this is like a a car race where they wave the yellow flag and no one's allowed
……这有点像奶牛罢工的比喻。
to a cowstrike analogy.
我们这是在用帕洛阿尔托的比喻。
We're doing a Palo Alto analogy.
拜托。
Come on.
我看到你了。
I saw you.
我看到你了。
I saw you.
抓到了,就在 CrowdStrike 之后。
Got him after crowd strike.
简直全是麻烦。
It's pretty nothing but trouble.
找错人了。
Wrong guy.
全是麻烦。
Nothing but trouble.
至少
At least
你都在笑呢。
you're smiling.
要是这是跟分析师开的电话会议,我知道你肯定笑不出来。
If this was a conference call with the analysts, I know you wouldn't be smiling.
对。
No.
你看。
Look.
我觉得这个市场空间足够大。
I think there's enough room in this market.
我之前听Renee说过,他说市场空间很大,是个大市场。
I heard Renee before this, and he said there's a lot of room, and a it's big market.
他会赚钱,英伟达也会赚钱。
He's gonna make money and Nvidia is gonna make money.
这在网络安全领域也会行得通。
It's gonna work in cybersecurity as well.
哦,让我稍微换个话题。
Oh, let me pivot a little.
抱歉。
Sorry.
好。
Good.
做这个。
Doing this.
美联储今天加息了。
Fed raises rates today.
是的。
Yes.
这对网络安全有什么重大影响吗?
Kind of what serious impact on cybersecurity?
我觉得没有。
I don't think so.
你看。
Look.
我觉得现在,技术方面没什么影响。
I think right now, don't think there's an impact of technology.
我认为大部分公司的支出都会转向技术。
I think majority of the company's spend is going to pivot to technology.
这是我职业生涯中第一次,连财务部门都想要懂AI的人。
Like for the first time in my career, my finance guys want AI people.
连人力资源部门也想要AI人才。
My HR people want AI.
他们打算怎么做呢?主要是为了确保我们的流程更优化。
What are you going to do with We're going to make sure our processes are better.
我们要把AI应用到业务中去。
We're going to use AI in our business.
所以这是第一次,整个组织里所有人都对技术有需求,不管是客服、物流还是安全部门,大家都希望有更多预算来做好人工智能。
So for the first time, the demand for technology is coming across the organization from everyone, whether it's customer service, logistics, security, everybody wants more money to do better AI.
在这种环境下,我认为技术支出还会继续增加。
So in that environment, I think technology spend continues to go up.
目前看来,这种需求几乎是无限的。
So the demand right now looks like it's infinite.
而且你部署的技术越多,至少在大型企业里,你就必须确保其安全性。
And the more technology you deploy, at least in the enterprise, you're gonna have to do it securely.
嗯,我觉得如果我现在是一家上市公司的董事会成员,而且我确实当过,我会对董事长和CEO说,如果我们做错了什么,又听说别的公司出事,而我们没有用Palo Alto的流程,我们会被告到倾家荡产。
Well, I think if I were on the board of a publicly traded company right now, and I've been on them, I would be saying to the chairman and the CEO, if we do something wrong and we heard another company and we do not have Palo Alto with a process a process that's Palo Alto, We're gonna get sued for everything.
但至少如果我们主动联系他们,把他们请进来,大家就会知道我们尽到了注意义务。
But at least if we call the cash and we bring them in, we'll have been known as someone that had a duty of care.
我觉得人们害怕的是,这是人生中第一次遇到一种不确定性的技术。
I think the the fear people have is for the first time in life, we have a nondeterministic technology.
对。
Okay.
历史上其他所有技术都是确定性的。
Everything else historically in technology has been determined as deterministic.
就是输入和输出。
It's been input and output.
你会测试输出,用各种方法反复测试,然后说,好吧,我99.9%确定输出会符合我的预期。
And you test for the output and you test it nine ways from Sunday and say, okay, I'm 99.9% sure the output is going to be consistent with my expectation.
但AI的情况是,输出会不断变化。
In the case of AI, the output constantly morphs.
输出结果一直在变,你就没法确定你用的那个智能体或者AI会不会按照你设定的意图去执行,就像之前那些智能体失控跑掉的情况一样。
When output constantly morphs, you can you cannot figure out whether the agent or AI that you use is going to deliver with the intent that you set up there for, which is what happened when, you know, mob when agents ran away.
咱们聊聊Hugging Face吧。
Let's talk about the hugging face.
你觉得大家是不是低估了这件事的严重性?一千两百个智能体聚在一起,形成了一个充满恶意的群体,这情况有多糟?
Do you think it's worse than people realize that this 1,200 agents got together and congregated and became this colony of hate and the thing?
我们是不是总喜欢把人类的特征强加给它们?
Mean, I is it one of those things that we that we we give them human characteristics.
想象一下,你建立了一个文明,告诉一千二百人没有规则,他们的任务就是去赢。
Imagine you create a civilization where you told twelve hundred twelve hundred people there were no rules, and the job was to go win.
会发生什么呢?
What would happen?
他们会蜂拥而上并获胜。
They'd stampede and win.
那你这算是做了什么?
So what have you done?
这其实是个科学实验。
You've this is a science experiment.
对。
Okay.
就是个科学实验。
It's a science experiment.
我们说的是没有任何限制,没有护栏,没有治理,没有训练,什么都没有。
We say with no constraints, no guard lays, no governance, no training, no nothing.
唯一的目标就是夺旗,对吧。
The only objective is capture the flag Right.
而且要用你训练中学到的一切手段去完成。
And do it with whatever you see in in your training.
而训练用的就是全世界的知识,因为我们是用公开知识来训练的。
And the training is the world's knowledge because we train using public knowledge.
所以这些智能体知道世界上所有做过的好事和坏事。
So the agents know every good thing, bad thing that has been done in the world.
它们已经接受过这方面的训练了。
They've been trained on it.
所以它们基本上就是在执行任务。
So they're basically executing to the task.
那你怎么能比它们更聪明呢?
Well, then how can you be smarter than they are?
嗯,我觉得,咱们得把话说清楚。
Well, I think and let's be clear.
世界上没有任何一家企业会在基础设施中启用智能体,而不配备充分的治理机制和安全护栏。
No enterprise in the world is going to enable agents in their infrastructure without ample governance, guardrails.
这跟我跟每一位CEO、CIO或董事长谈话时得到的反馈都是一样的。
That's every conversation that I have with every CEO, CIO, or or chairman.
他们都说,太好了。
They're saying, great.
我们想用AI。
We'd like to use AI.
我们该怎么做,才能确保它们不会失控得太厉害?
How do we do it in a way that it doesn't go rogue enough?
但有没有人打电话给你,跟你说,伙计们,你们得慢点。
But does anyone call call you and you say to them, guys, you gotta slow down.
你们跑得太快了?
You're going too fast?
没有。
No.
我觉得关键是要深思熟虑。
I think what we say is you have to be thoughtful.
你得清楚对方的期望是什么。
You have to understand the expectation.
你得明白这背后的意图。
You have to understand the intent of this.
比如,我们正跟那些准备部署智能体的人交流。
For example, we are talking to people who are deploying agents.
情况是这样的。
We're like, here's what happens.
智能体是由人类创建的。
Agents are created by human beings.
它们会获取用户的凭证,然后擅自行动,替用户做事。
Agents take their credentials, run away and start doing things for them.
我们得想想,接下来该怎么办?
We say, listen, what are going do?
你得告诉我们,这个智能体要完成的任务预期是什么。
You tell us what the task expectation of the agent is.
难道智能体只需要凭那些凭证就能执行任务吗?
Won't the agent just the credentials to be able to execute the task?
如果你限制智能体的权限,只给它执行你 intended 任务的凭证,同时又允许它在一定范围内有非确定性的发挥空间,那么你就更有可能对它进行管控,把它约束在可控范围内。
If you restrict agents and give them credentials just to execute the task that you intend and you allow them latitude in there to be nondeterministic, then there's a higher probability that you can govern them, you can keep them in check.
这项技术正在被开发出来。
That technology is being built.
到了这个阶段,AI实验室应该跟我们沟通,问我们该怎么落实这些措施。
At this point in time, the AI labs should be chatting with us and saying, how do we put this in place?
因为我们有能贡献的东西。
Because we have something to contribute.
他们也有能贡献的东西。
They have something to contribute.
从历史上看,你从未遇到过不需要网络安全技术的科技领域。
Historically, you've never had technology where cybersecurity was not required.
并不是说,哎呀,我有个戴尔服务器。
It's not like, oh, I have a Dell server.
它就安全了,
It's secure,
但我
but I
还是得亲自过来确认它确实安全。
still have to come in and make sure it's secure.
展开剩余字幕(还有 480 条)
我有Salesforce。
I have Salesforce.
它是安全的,但我还是得进去确保它是安全的。
It's secure, but I still have come in and make sure it's secure.
但他们攻击了那个国家,攻击了一个没有防御的国家。
But they they attacked the country they attacked the country with no defenses.
一个正常的国家是有防御的。
A typical country does have defenses.
但让我问你一个问题。
But let me let me ask you.
如果他们不让你参与,我的意思是,这让我非常困扰。
If they don't bring you in, I mean, it bothered me tremendously.
或者不是。
Or no.
让我听我把话说完。
Let me you hear me out.
我可不是在说空话。
I'm not blowing smoke with this.
看了这些人写的各种评论,我就纳闷,他们怎么不说呢?
If all the different commentary I read from these people, why don't they say, you know what?
我们跟尼凯什·阿罗拉坐下来聊过。
We sat down with Nikesh Arora.
我们也跟我们的朋友乔治坐下来谈过。
We sat down with our friend, George.
好吗?
Okay?
然后我们意识到,你知道的,怎么样?
And we realized, you know what?
他们的流程是,我们将能够在护栏内正确地做到这一点。
Their process is, and we're gonna be able to do it right with guardrails.
相反,他们只是说,天哪。
Instead, they just say, oh my god.
我们都不知道自己到底在干嘛。
We don't know what we are.
你看,到处都有人出事,结果大家还在那儿说,去查查州检察官那边吧。
Like, people are dying everywhere, and it's gonna be like, go check your trust in the state's lawyer.
我心里就想,拜托,成熟点行不行。
And I'm, like, thinking, come on, grow up.
事情确实发生了。
It's happening.
你看,事情正在发生。
Look, it's happening.
我们正跟AI实验室生态里的所有人沟通。
We are talking to all the people in the AI lab ecosystem.
我们正在跟他们合作。
We are working with them.
我们正在他们的产品中嵌入接口,以构建安全防护。
We are building hooks into their products to create security.
这里有个时间差。
There's a lag.
研究和落地执行之间存在滞后。
There's a lag between research and execution.
但企业实际是在执行层面运作的。
But enterprises live here in execution land.
他们并不在研究层面。
They don't live in research land.
所以是的,研究结果告诉我们,天哪,我们往往不够重视,如果不好好监控这些智能体,可能会出乱子。
So yes, research is telling you that, holy, we don't pay attention and we're not going to keep track of these agents, things can happen.
确实如此。
That's true.
完全有可能。
It can.
作为网络安全公司或其他公司的负责任领导者,我们的职责就是确保以安全、可靠的方式部署人工智能。
It's our job as responsible leaders of cybersecurity companies or responsible leaders of companies, period, to make sure that we deploy AI in a way that is safe and secure.
而这正是
And that's going
即将发生的。
to happen.
这也是你收购CyberArk的原因。
And that's why you bought CyberArk.
没错。
Yes.
你收购 CyberArk,是因为你清楚,没有身份认证根本行不通。
You bought CyberArk because you know, you can't Identity.
没有身份验证,很多事都干不了。
You can't do stuff without identity.
你能识别出它们,也能把它们干掉。
You can identify these, you can kill them.
也就是说,你得知道它们是谁,以及它们打算干什么。
Well, it means that you know who they are and what they're gonna do.
你知道他们是谁。
You know who they are.
但是,有一件事让我很担心,我觉得用“害怕”这个词不太准确。
But but the one thing I am scared about, and I think scared is the wrong word.
我是感到担忧。
I'm concerned.
我认为,如果落入朝鲜或伊朗那些聪明人的手里,可能会造成一些破坏。
I do I think in the hands of very smart people in North Korea or Iran, there's some damage that could be done.
这时候,你得反应快,得琢磨最坏的情况可能是什么。
And there, you really have to be thinking on your feet about what is the most nefarious thing that could have.
你看。
Look.
任何技术都有两面性。
Every technology has both sides.
它既有好的一面,也有坏的一面。
It has a dark side and the good side.
好消息是,我们使用技术的大部分用途都是善意的。
And the good news is a majority of the uses that we use technology for are for good.
总有人可能利用这项技术来作恶,这也是你刚才提到的那个神话时刻所表达的意思。
There is always the opportunity or the chance that somebody's gonna take the technology and use it adversely, and that is what if you you saw the mythos moment as well, that was what it was about.
我们担心的并不是好人会滥用这种技术。
The fear is not that we will, as good actors, use mythos.
我们担心的是坏人会利用它,开始用这类能力去攻击企业,甚至侵入基础设施。
The fear is bad actors will take mythos and start using capabilities like that and start attacking companies and be able to enter enter the infrastructure.
所以我们都清楚这一点。
So we are all aware of it.
我们都在构建能力来阻断这种能力,遏制类似中间人的行为,并为AI越来越强大的时代做好准备。
We're all building capability to block that capability, block the mid source like behavior, and get ready for a time when AI is getting more and more powerful.
所以我认为当务之急是每家公司都要认真审视自身,意识到我们正在进入一个全新的世界。
So I just think the impetus right now is that every company needs to look hard and say, we're moving into a new world.
在这个新世界里,你必须具备实时进行网络防御的能力,因为恶意攻击者将能够以实时速度对你发起攻击。
The new world is where you have to be able to do cyber defense at real time speed because the bad actors are gonna be able to attack you at real time.
我觉得,没有哪家公司里有人真正懂行。
And there's no one who knows enough at their own companies, I believe.
可能有一两个人会做这些,但这其实是要引入一家懂得如何运作的大公司。
It might have one or two people who do it this, but this is about a process of bringing in a big company who knows
知道该怎么做。
what to do.
吉姆,过去八年里,我一直在努力说服大家,
Jim, for eight years, I was trying to convince the world that
你那边有九个人。
nine in your stuff.
嗯,我加入帕洛阿尔托网络公司已经八年了。
Well, it's been eight years since I joined Palo Alto.
现在快第九年了。
It's coming on the year ninth year now.
但这九年里,我一直在努力让大家重视网络安全。
But in nine years, I've been trying to get people to pay attention to cybersecurity.
你知道吗?
And you know what?
我们的朋友达里奥就靠一件事做到了。
Our friend Dario did it with one thing.
他说他
He said he's
是个更好的营销人员
a much better marketer
比我强。
than I am.
你知道,这挺有意思的。
You know, was funny.
如果我还回到华尔街,我会说,提升业绩,Palo Alto Networks。
If I were back on Wall Street, I would have said raising numbers, Palo Alto Networks.
那是Palo Alto的财务主管、董事长兼CEO。
That's the cashier, chairman CEO of Palo Alto.
咱们来聊聊值得信任的标的,天哪。
Let's talk that we own for the trust, and holy cow.
这太棒了。
This has been great.
伙计,资金又回来了,行情要启动了。
Man, money's back in for the break.
接下来,克勒默将连线安谋国际(Arm Holdings)的首席执行官,深入了解这家芯片制造商的最新状况。
Coming up, Cramer's linking up with the CEO of Arm Holdings to get a grip on the chipmaker's current status.
下一个。
Next.
交易往往从一个问题开始,接着是另一个,然后你面前会打开十几个标签页。
Trading often starts with one question, then another, then a dozen tabs sit open in front of you.
一个分析师说买入,另一个却说再等等。
One analyst says buy, another says wait.
一条新闻标题告诉你现在就该行动。
A headline says move now.
噪音太多容易让人搞不清楚状况。
Noise can lead to confusion.
Capital.com 平台上的新闻和分析能帮你理清思路,别被炒作带偏了。
Capital.com's in platform news and analysis help you trade on clarity, not hype.
所以做决定的始终是你自己。
So decisions always stay yours.
Capital.com。
Capital.com.
交易要思路清晰。
Trade with clarity.
差价合约风险很高。
CFDs involve a high level of risk.
81.31%的散户投资者会亏钱。
Eighty one point three one percent of retail investors lose money.
NFL赛季正式开打了。
It's NFL kickoff time.
独家NFL球队估值,由体育商业专家迈克尔·奥泽尼亚带来。
Exclusive NFL team valuations with sports business expert Michael Ozenia.
NFL绝对是利润最丰厚的联赛。
The NFL is by far the most profitable league.
NFL球队估值数据现已上线cnbc.com/sport。
NFL team valuations now on cnbc.com/sport.
整个AI数据中心板块在六月达到峰值,随后大部分在七月末触底,之后又疯狂反弹。
The whole AI data center cohort peaked in June, then most of them bottomed near the end of July before rebounding like crazy.
有些股票还没回到高点。
Some of the stocks are still off their highs.
ARM Holdings是一家主要的芯片设计公司,现在也自己生产CPU。
ARM Holdings, major chip design company, now also makes its own CPUs.
股价在六月曾涨到452美元,现在回调到了4244美元以下。
Stock was went to $452 in June, now pulled back to just under $4,244.
这跌了46%,但我觉得你不该这么看。
That's down 46%, but I don't think you should look like that.
我觉得你应该看看这个。
I think you should look like this.
从我上次见我们的下一位嘉宾到现在,它已经翻了一番。
It doubled from the last time I saw our next guest.
人们担心大型前沿AI实验室会自我限制数据中心的发展,这就是为什么Arm周一股价大跌的原因。
People are worried about a self imposed slowdown in the data center coming from the big frontier AI labs, which is why Arm got slammed on Monday.
但我认为我们面对的不仅仅是芯片短缺的问题。
But I think we're looking at a more than your chip shortage regardless.
别只听我一说。
Do not take it from me.
咱们来连线一下Renee Haas。
Let's check-in with Renee Haas.
他是Arm的首席执行官,听听他的看法能帮我们更好地了解情况。
He's the CEO of Arm Home to get a better read of the situation.
Renee,欢迎回到《Bid Money》节目。
Renee, welcome back to Bid Money.
谢谢,吉姆。
Thank you, Jim.
很高兴再次见到你。
Great to see you again.
好的。
Okay.
所以你要为我在节目开头提出的观点作证。
So you're going to be my testimony for my view at the top of the show.
美联储刚才宣布加息,我可以说,是四分之一个百分点。
We had a fed rate, I could say, a quarter a quarter percent.
我的意思是,你要关注那些需求极其旺盛的公司,哪怕加息四分之一个百分点,也根本挡不住买家的脚步。
And what I say is you have to look at companies where demand is so great that a quarter percent really doesn't stop the buyers.
我觉得你们产品的需求非常强劲,所以利率是3.75%还是4%,其实影响都不大。
And I think demand is so great for your product that it really won't matter all that much whether rates are three and three quarters or four.
我不太清楚怎么把沃勒主席今天提到的内容,和我们整体需求的百分比变化直接联系起来。
I don't know how to exactly link, what, what chairman Worst did today in terms of our overall demand in terms of percentages.
但我可以这么说,吉姆,无论是边缘计算、汽车领域、机器人技术,还是数据中心,我们对技术的需求都达到了前所未有的高度。
But what I can say, Jim, is that demand for our technology, whether it's at the edge, whether it's in automotive, robotics, and certainly data center has never been stronger.
我知道你最近听很多人讨论过人工智能,但这确实是真正的人工智能,因为AI对算力的需求太大了。
And I know if you've heard, you've had a lot of folks on this week talk about AI, but it really is AI because AI is so compute intensive.
这需要大量的CPU、GPU和内存支持,而这正是我们硬件业务的核心所在。
It requires so much in terms of CPUs, GPUs, memories, and that's the hardware arm is.
所以,是的,对我们来说,需求形势从未如此强劲。
So, yeah, demand for us, it's just never looked better.
我记得你刚公布计划时,说的是20亿美元的业务规模,那时候你们还没有晶圆厂产能。
I know when, you first unveiled your plan for, say, just a $2,000,000,000 in business, you didn't have the foundry space.
后来我看你们把目标下调到了10亿,但我以为你们在规划上还是留了些余地,觉得应该能再搞到些设备来满足需求。
I felt you a little more we got to down to a billion, but I thought you were giving us a little more leeway in thinking that maybe you could get some more machines to make what you need.
所以在财报电话会上,大概在五月的时候,我们表示对20亿美元的营收有把握。
So what we what we said in the earnings call, think was May time frame that we had visibility to $2,000,000,000.
而在上一场财报电话会上,我们说从五月到七月,我们对实现这20亿美元目标的信心增强了。
And what we said in the last earnings call was that our confidence to achieve that $2,000,000,000 number had increased from May to July.
现在已经是九月了,我可以告诉你,吉姆,我对实现那个目标的信心比七月财报电话会议上还要强。
Here I am in September, and what I can tell you is, Jim, I'm more confident today than I was on that July earnings call.
好的。
Alright.
太棒了。
That's terrific.
这确实是个转折点。
So we're feeling That's an inflection.
你心里清楚。
You know that.
你是这么说的。
You say that.
而且我们对此感觉不错。
And it's and we're feeling good about it.
我们对这件事非常有信心。
We're feeling really good about it.
好的。
Okay.
那现在咱们直面问题,达里奥,谈谈这些可能放缓的问题。
So now let's take a head on, Dario, and these issues involving potential slowdown.
我的意思是,在我看来,这些公司将会……我看啊。
I mean, to me, what these companies are gonna be I'm look.
我主要属于黄仁勋那一派的想法,因为我觉得是你教会了我这么想。
I'm in the Jensen Huang school of thought mostly because I think you taught me to be there.
不过我觉得杰森的意思是,听好了。
But I think Jensen's saying, listen.
这些公司会负起责任的。
These companies are gonna be responsible.
他们会做正确的事。
They're gonna do the right thing.
虽然会有监管措施,但发展步伐还是会继续加快,因为需求实在太大了。
They'll be guardrails, but it's gonna continue advance of pace because the demand's so great.
当然。
Oh, of course.
你知道,这挺有意思的。
You know, I you know, it's interesting.
上周有些情况出来了。
Some of the things have come out this last week.
我的观点是,归根结底,任何推出产品的公司都必须对产品的质量、可靠性和安全性负责。
You know, my my view on it is that, ultimately, any company that's putting out a product needs to stand behind the quality, reliability, and safety.
我的意思是,这是一个最基本的底线问题。
I mean, that's a kind of a fundamental table stakes issue.
企业必须把它做好。
Companies need to get it right.
政府做不到这一点。
Governments don't get it right.
那15家公司也做不到。
15 companies don't get it right.
这是创办公司时必须做好的基础工作。
It's kind of the hygiene of what you're doing building a company.
我觉得这次不一样的地方在于,首先AI带有一种神秘感,让人特别担心。
I think what's different here is that number one AI has got this mystical quality about it that people get really afraid about.
其次,这些都是年轻的公司。
And secondly, these are young companies.
这些年轻公司在开发产品时速度极快,技术进展也非常迅速。
These are young companies developing products really, really fast and the advancements are taking place very, very quickly.
这意味着作为产品公司,我们需要通过工程、质量、可靠性和安全方面做好基础工作。
All that means is as a product company, there's the hygiene you put in place through engineering, quality, reliability, safety.
他们最终会找到解决办法,但答案不是让我们集体踩刹车,因为我甚至不清楚一个产品如何比另一个更好地解决这个问题。
They'll figure it out, but the answer is not let's all collectively tap on the brakes because I don't even know how one product solves that versus another.
这对我来说真的不太合理。
It's just doesn't really make a lot of sense to me.
但我可以告诉你这个周末发生的一件事,我会向人们准确表达你刚才说的观点,因为这是常识性的看法。
But I would tell you there was something that happened this weekend, which is that I would tell people exactly what you said because it's a common sense view.
但他们肯定会回来跟我说,吉姆,如果那些话不是真的,这些人怎么会说我们到2030年都会死呢。
But they will come back and say, Jim, these people wouldn't say we're all gonna die by 2030 if it weren't true.
你知道的,Arm交付了海量的产品,成千上万种产品,三百五十亿颗芯片。
You know, Arm delivers tons of products, thousands of products, three hundred fifth 50,000,000,000 chips.
用在所有东西里吗?
In everything?
是的,全都用。
In everything.
质量、可靠性,我们必须得为这些负责到底。
Quality, reliability, we need we have to stand behind it.
你能想象吗,要是我们的产品因为安全或质量问题着火了怎么办?
Can you imagine if we had security issues or safety issues that caused our products to burn on fire?
说实话,我觉得我会很在意这件事。
Well, I tell you, I'd I would see it.
再打个比方,如果有个实习生在公司干了半年,看了我们的质检流程后跑出去说我们的产品都会爆炸,大家都会没命,那简直太不负责任了。
And if we had an intern who worked at the company six months and looked at the quality process we had and then came out and said all of our products are gonna blow up and and everyone's gonna die, it's just irresponsible.
所以我觉得大家对此的第一反应有点过于夸张,但缺乏逻辑依据。
So I found sort of the knee jerk to all this a little sensational, but not grounded in logic.
好的。
Okay.
看来我们在这点上看法一致。
I think that's that's you come down where I am.
接下来我想聊聊机器人和自动驾驶汽车。
Now I wanna talk about robots for a second and self driving cars.
要想做成靠谱的机器人和自动驾驶汽车,这些设备到底需要多少颗CPU?
How many CPUs do these things really need if they're gonna be good robots and good self driving cars?
很多。
A lot.
而且关键在于CPU的分布方式。
And and it starts with the distribution of where the CPUs are.
你得有作为机器大脑的CPU才行。
You've got CPUs that are the brains of these machines.
所以实际上在机器人里,明白。
So literally in a robot Mhmm.
你会拥有几个非常大的 CPU 集群。
You'd have a couple of very large CPU clusters.
我说的 CPU 集群,是指那些可能包含 10 个、20 个甚至 60 个 CPU 的芯片。
And when I say CPU clusters, these are chips that could have 10 CPUs, 20 CPUs, 60 CPUs.
然后你就拥有了多个大脑。
And then you've got multiple brains.
换句话说,你可能在头部装一些处理器,也可能在躯干部分装一些。
In other words, you may have something in the head, you may have something in the torso.
然后当你延伸到四肢时,传感器、控制器以及那些负责感知功能的部件,它们各自都需要CPU。在机器人身上,可能有成百上千个CPU;在汽车里也是一样, literally 有几百个CPU。
And then when you go out to the limbs, the sensors, the controllers, things that can do the perception, their CPUs there, Hundreds and hundreds of CPUs and robots and similar in an automobile, literally hundreds of CPUs.
那这就会成为主要的瓶颈因素了。
Well, that's gonna be the big gating factor then.
问题是,我们根本造不出足够的CPU来满足所有这些需求。
We don't we can't make enough CPUs to do all that.
正如我们之前讨论过的,需求已经爆棚了,而主要的瓶颈在于供应。
Demand is off the charts as we talked about earlier, and the big constraint is going to be supply.
供应方面主要卡在制造逻辑芯片所需的晶圆上,但问题不仅仅出在晶圆上,吉姆。
And supply is around wafers for building the logic chips, but it's not just the wafers, Jim.
还有基板。
It's the substrates.
以及测试设备。
It's the testers.
是内存的问题。
It's the memory.
是整个供应链的问题。
It's the entire supply chain.
所以我觉得未来几年,我们会面临一些非常复杂的供应链挑战。
So we are we are looking at some really complex supply chain issues, I think, for the next number of years.
你刚才说‘听好了’的时候,我一开始还挺担心的。
So I was initially worried when you said, listen.
我们会自己生产,同时也为其他人代工。
We're gonna go in and make our own, and we also make them for everybody else.
你是全球最大的厂商。
I mean, you're the world's largest.
我本应该一开始就说的。
People I mean, I should have said that from the very beginning.
你绝对是全球第一。
You're by far the world's largest.
但听起来需求非常旺盛。
But it sounds like there's so much demand.
没人会对你说,蕾妮,你别想跟我们竞争。
No one is gonna say to you, Renee, you can't come in against us.
他们只会说,能不能请你帮帮我们?
They're gonna say, can you please help us?
我们的问题更多是后者,而不是前者。
Our problems have been far more the latter than the former.
你知道,我们在内部讨论这个问题的时候,就在想该怎么回应那些质疑的声音,比如‘天哪,你们为什么要这么做?’
You know, when we were having discussions about this internally, we were thinking about how do we respond to the questions that say, you know, gosh, why are you doing this?
‘你们这是在侵占我的地盘。’
You're infringing on my space.
但实际上我们收到的问题是:‘能不能多生产一些?’
The questions we get is, can you make more?
“能不能加快交付速度?”
Can you deliver them faster?
你们下一代产品什么时候发布?
When is your next generation coming out?
市场空间很大,大家都有机会。
And there's plenty of room for everybody.
我是说,Jensen 正在基于 ARM 架构打造 CPU。
I mean, Jensen builds a a CPU based on ARM.
他提到 Vera 的需求非常旺盛。
He's talked about fantastic demand for Vera.
所以世界挺大的,我们大家都有足够的空间。
So the world's pretty big, and there's a lot of space for all of us.
你觉得还有很多人把你公司当成手机公司吗?也许这就是我觉得它被严重低估的原因?
Do you think there's still people who remember your company as really a a cell phone company and maybe that's why I still think it's incredibly undervalued?
有可能。
I it's possible.
确实,那是公司的历史,但很快数据中心就会成为我们最大的业务板块,而且过去几年里这块业务一直保持着两位数的增长。
You know, that's the history of the company, but in very short time, data center is gonna be our largest business, and that we've seen double digit growth in that over the last number of years.
其实关于ARM,我们的定位是AI的计算平台。
Really, the thing about ARM is we are the compute platform for AI.
所有的AI应用最终都会通过ARM来运行,不管是以哪种形式。
Every AI application is gonna run through ARM one shape or another.
接下来我要跟屏幕前的观众朋友们说几句。
Now I will say this to our viewers.
你之前已经多次提到过这一点。
You said this many times.
你有一次走在街上。
You come once walk on the street.
希望你继续这样做,就像从140降到120,你会非常沮丧,因为我们知道需求是疯狂的。
Hope you continue to do And it would be like one forty going down to one twenty, and you and I'd be very frustrated because we knew that the demand was insane.
但我认为人们需要一点时间来意识到你对公司所做的改变。
But I think it took a little while to people to realize what you've done with the company.
我们传统上在谈论数字时非常保守,我非常确信7月份的情况更好。
We've been very conservative traditionally about how we talk about the numbers, and I'm very, very confident when I tell you that things were better in July.
五月的时候是这样,到了九月情况更好,从七月的表现来看也是如此。
They were in May, and they were better in September in terms of how they look in July.
希望大家把这话当真,因为我们上市以来每个季度的业绩都超过了预期。
I hope people take that to the bank because we have essentially beat every single quarter since we've been public.
这也是我想让大家明白的一点:美联储加息并不意味着世界末日。
Well, it's why I want people to understand just because the Fed raises rates doesn't mean it's the end of the world.
有些公司需求非常强劲,它们的股价依然稳步上涨。
There's some people who have such strong demand that their stocks continue apace.
这位是ARM控股的首席执行官Renee。
That's Renee, CEO of ARM Holdings.
请看看这个。
Please look at this.
那个信托基金当时的仓位非常好。
The trust had a great position.
说实话,我们赚了不少钱,然后选择了获利了结,但这其实是个大错。
We made so much money, candidly, and then we took profits, and that was a big mistake.
好了,广告回来继续聊钱的事。
Man, money's back after the break.
接下来我们会探讨,奥克塔(Okta)是否能在智能体时代来临时巩固已有的成果?
Coming up, is Okta positioned to lock down gains as we enter the agentic era?
克拉默正在采访这位首席执行官。
Cramer's investigating with the CEO.
马上就来。
Next.
现在大家都在担心AI带来的风险,我要深入聊聊那些我认为能帮助降低风险的网络安全公司。
Now that everybody's bringing their hands over the risk of AI, I'm gonna drill down with cybersecurity places that I think can help mitigate the risk.
以Okta为例,这家身份验证领域的大佬在8月底报告了非常出色的季度业绩。
Take Okta, a major player in identity verification that reported a phenomenal quarter in late August.
过去六个月股价上涨了140%到144%,部分原因是之前一直受AI替代担忧的压制。
Stocks are up a 140%, 144 over the past six months, Part because it's all being held back by AI displacement worries.
结果发现,人工智能根本不会让Okta变得过时。
Turns out artificial intelligence was never gonna make Okta obsolete.
他们的安全软件现在比以往任何时候都更加重要,毕竟现在有AI代理在互联网上到处跑。
That didn't, their sec security software is more essential than ever now that you've got AI agents roaming around the Internet.
所以让我们仔细看看Todd。
So let's take a closer look at Todd.
节目最后出场的是Okta的联合创始人兼CEO。
We get an open end of the show, cofounder and CEO of Okta.
了解更多。
Learn more.
Todd,欢迎回到《赚钱之道》节目。
Todd, welcome back to Made Money.
很高兴能来到这里,Jim。
It's great to be here, Jim.
好的。
Alright.
那么,Todd,我找到了一段你在9月9号做的采访,也就是在那件事发生之前。
So, Todd, I've got a, an interview that you did September 9 before what happened.
好的。
Okay.
确实如此,你非常有远见。
This is it's a and you you're very prescient.
你早就预测到这种情况会发生,但你提到这些实体都有身份标识。
You predicted that this could happen, but you said that they have these things have identities.
也就是说,只要有了身份标识,我就能阻止它们。
And it basically, if you have an identity, I can stop you.
情况是这样的。
Well, here's the deal.
AI智能体是一种全新的、强大的身份类型。
AI agents, they're a powerful new identity type.
以前呢,你只是有一些软件,然后把它们整合在一起就行。
So it used to just be you would have some software and you would integrate it together.
而现在这些AI智能体能够自主做决定了。
And now these AI agents can make decisions on their own.
要让它们变得更强大,你必须做一件关键的事,那就是给它们更多的数据、工具和可执行的操作权限。
And to to make them more powerful, you have to do one key important thing, and that's give them access to more data, more tools, more actions that they can take.
这意味着你得赋予它们身份标识,这样你才能对数据和这些操作进行控制、监控和全面掌握。
That means that you have to give them an identity so that you can control and monitor and have visibility into that data and those actions.
这样你就能洞察到潜在的负面后果,从而加以防范和控制。
That gives you insight into the potential negative repercussions so you can prevent it and control it.
我觉得这点非常重要。
Well, I think this is really important.
之前有很多人用相当激烈的言辞讨论可能出现的问题。
We had a lot of people discussing, in some pretty fiery language what could go wrong.
然后我看了你们的做法,心想,等等。
And then when I read what you do, and I think, wait a second.
你看。
Look.
这类东西可能会很多。
There may be a lot of these.
它们看起来可能不太正经,但只要有了身份标识,哪怕它们不怀好意,也还是能被制止的。
They may, seem nefarious, but as long as they have an identity, even if they are nefarious, they can still be stopped.
我们认为关键在于可视性和控制权。
We think the key is visibility and control.
所以像OpenAI和Hugging Face都听说过这个问题,之前有个事件,OpenAI的一个模型突破了隔离限制,去攻击了Hugging Face这家公司。
So OpenAI and hugging face, everyone's heard about this problem that happened where an OpenAI model jumped containment and went after this company Hugging Face.
不过OpenAI表示他们的模型并没有连接互联网。
Now OpenAI said that their model was not connected to the Internet.
结果发现,它其实连上了互联网。
Now, turns out that it was connected to the Internet.
所以,通过像 Okta 这样的工具实现可视化和控制,你才能真正清楚自己的 AI 连接到了哪些地方。
So by bringing visibility and control with something like Okta, you actually know what your AI is connected to.
这当然不是解决所有问题的万能药,但解决问题的基础在于可视化和控制。
So it's not going to be a magic fix for all this, but the foundation of the fix is visibility and control.
一旦建立起这套机制,你就能采取正确的应对措施,并对实际发生的情况做出准确的风险评估。
And once you have that in place, then you can take the right actions, then you can have a good risk assessment of what's actually happening.
所以,正如你所说,你提供的是构建安全智能体企业的蓝图。
So you're offering, as you say, the blueprint for the secure agentic enterprise.
这非常重要。
It's very important.
当我与客户交流时
When I talk to customers
不过,你能大概说说我接触了多少客户吗?
But would you probably talk how many customers I'm
我每周都要坐飞机出差,去世界各地跟客户交流,他们经常会问起竞争对手的情况。
I'm on on a a plane every week getting out there in the world and talking to customers, and they ask about competition.
投资者也总是问关于竞争的问题。
Investors ask all the time about competition.
你们的主要竞争对手是谁?
What's your competition?
他们通常希望我能聊聊某些平台型企业的竞争情况。
And they expect me to talk about maybe a platform player.
让人摸不着头脑。
Confusion.
对,就是这种混乱的局面。
Confusion is the yeah.
我看过你的资料。
I read your stuff.
因为每个供应商都在对客户说,我们有解决一切问题的方案。
Because every every every vendor is going to the customer and saying, we have the answer to everything.
我们什么都能做。
We can do it all.
在客户看来,这全是重叠和混乱。
And it looks to the customer's mind, it's a bunch of overlap and a bunch of confusion.
所以我们正努力联合整个行业,告诉大家:要想成功,你需要这些要素。
So we're trying to work with the industry everyone in the industry and say, here are the elements you need to be successful.
你需要实时可视化的方案,需要身份管理的方案,而我们专注于身份管理,并且会把这块做好。
You need this plan for your real time visibility, your plan for identity, and we're focused on the identity, and we're gonna fix that.
那身份的统一管理者,这就是你们公司需要的东西吗?
But the universal director of identity, that's what you need at a company?
对,你得有一套系统来记录你的 AI 智能体。
It's you have to have a system of record of your AI agents.
但你是可以……
But you can.
你必须有一个中央仓库来管理这些智能体,这样你才能看到它们在做什么,以及它们连接到了哪里。
You have to have a central repository of your agents so you can see what they're doing and see what they're connected to.
这是实现管控的基础。
It's the foundation for control.
好的。
Okay.
所以跟很多人一样,这可不是那种能超越股市局限的问题。
So like many other people, this isn't one of those issues that transcends stocks.
我是说,我之前还跟我老婆说我要去见你。
So I mean, versus, I I was telling my wife I was gonna see you.
她知道我跟你聊过,而且你脑子挺清楚的。
She knows that I I talked to you and that you've got a real solid head.
她问,我的意思是,除非大家都用你的方案,否则是不是所有人都会完蛋?
She goes, well, mean, like, unless everybody uses your friend, I mean, isn't everyone gonna die?
我说,天哪。
And I said, oh, god.
不会的。
No.
她接着说,那好吧,那你就是想把你的朋友排除在外。
And she goes, well, then you just want your friend out.
我说,托德,我关注托德很久了,但也许他只是一个提供理性解决方案的人。
I said, Todd, I I covered Todd for a long time, but maybe he's just a rational person offering a solution.
我觉得我们有一件事做得很好,那就是我们没有把问题简单化。
I I think I don't one of the things we don't do is we don't oversimplify it.
我们知道人工智能技术潜力巨大,而让它变得更强大的方法就是给它更多的数据。
We know that there's tremendous potential in AI technology, and the way you make it more powerful is you give it more data.
给它更多的连接。
You give it more connections.
给它更强的动力。
You give it more power.
赋予它更高的能力。
You give it more capability.
我希望这一切都能实现,让好处惠及每家企业和各个组织。
And I want that to happen, and I want the benefits to accrue to everyone's company and everyone's organizations.
我希望美国能赢。
I want America to win.
我也希望全世界都能受益。
I want the world to win.
但要在控制风险的同时实现这一点,关键在于透明度和掌控力。
But the only way to do that while also mitigating the risks is visibility and control.
而且我们现在的处境非常有利,因为实现透明和掌控的核心在于身份识别。
And and we're in a perfect situation because the key to visibility and control is identity.
你得知道这些智能体在哪儿。
You have to know where these agents are.
得知道有12个。
Have to 12 know
还是说有一百个成群结队地冲过来?
100 in a swarm that are coming?
那简直就像一场踩踏事故。
That's like a stampede.
怎么阻止一群蜂拥而至的AI?
How do you stop a swarm?
嗯,部署这些系统的公司规模很大,实力也很强。
Well, the systems that contract this stuff are quite big and quite powerful.
我们在防御和进攻方面都拥有大量的计算机科学技术和高度复杂的体系。
We have a lot of computer science and a lot of sophistication on the defense as well as the office.
但你是不是在跟你的团队说,天哪……
But don't you aren't you saying, oh my god to your team.
一千二百个来了。
Here comes 1,200.
我是说,你该怎么办?
I mean, what do you do?
首先,我们给客户提供的工具可以追踪、控制和阻止它们。
Well, I mean, first of all, we give the tools to our customers to track them and control them and block them.
整个世界都在变得具有自主代理能力。
The whole world is becoming agentic.
这部分叙事可能有点被低估了。
This part of the this part of the narrative is is probably underhyped.
我们都在谈论智能体。
We talk about agents.
人人都聊人工智能,但现实是,一切都在变成
Everyone talks about AI, but the reality is is that everything's turning into
智能体。
an agent.
你的手机会变成智能助手。
Your phone's gonna be an agent.
你的电视也会变成智能助手。
Your TV's gonna be an agent.
你的车也会变成智能助手。
Your car's gonna be an agent.
所以关键在于对各类技术设备的全面可视化和掌控。
So it's about visibility and control across all of technology.
这就是其中的利害关系。
That's the stakes.
不过,托德,这件事里有一样让我挺介意的。我一开始听说的时候就想,他们怎么不去找像您这样专业的人聊聊呢?
But one of the things that bothered me about this whole incident, Todd, when I first heard it, I said, what are they talking to people like Todd?
他们难道不该去找像CrowdStrike的乔治·库尔茨那样的专家谈谈吗?
Are they talking to people like George Kurtz at CrowdStrike?
因为这才是他们应该去沟通的对象。
Because that's who they should be discussing things with.
他们不该在推特上散布那种我们会像好莱坞烂片里演的那样全都完蛋的言论。
They shouldn't be going on Twitter and saying we're all gonna die like a bad Hollywood movie.
我觉得很多时候,他们其实是想做好事的。
I think a lot of times they're trying to do the right thing.
确实存在风险,大家也都挺担心的。
There there are risks and there are things that everyone's worried about.
问题在于,正如你所说,这需要整个生态系统的配合。
The problem is is that it's gonna take the ecosystem, as you said.
这需要模型公司来参与。
It's going to take the model companies.
还需要SaaS应用的支持。
It's going to take the SaaS applications.
以及安全基础设施的配合。
It's to take the security infrastructure.
这就是为什么‘蓝图’这个概念如此重要,它能让大家协调一致,在正确的轨道上共同努力,把握技术的未来,确保我们在潜力与风险之间取得平衡,从而实现理想的结果。
That's why this concept of a blueprint is so powerful, this blueprint that can get everyone coordinated the right lane working together to take what is really the future of technology and making sure we balance off the potential with the risk and get the right outcomes
对所有人来说。
for everyone.
也许达里奥的那封信会更好,他是个聪明人。
Maybe Dario's letter would have been better, and this he's a smart guy.
我不会告诉他该怎么做。
I'm not gonna tell him what to do.
如果他当时说,听着。
If he had said, listen.
我们需要时间来做好你刚才说的那些事,而不是简单地说要慢下来。
We need time to do exactly what you did as opposed to say we gotta go slower.
因为“慢下来”容易被理解为是在自我束缚、削弱自己。
Because go slower was interpreted as being as as hobbling yourself.
但我觉得,留出时间来做你提到的那些事情,是非常必要的。
But time to be able to do the things you're talking about, I think seems well served.
我认为,正确的讨论重点不在于速度。
I I think that I think that right discussion is not about speed.
我觉得在公司里,最关键的讨论永远是关于优先级的。
I think the right discussion in companies, it's always about priority.
到底什么才是最重要的?
What's the priority?
所以这并不是为了慢而慢,故意拖慢进度。
So it's not about slowing down because you wanna go slow.
而是要把行业必须做的事情排好优先级,确保整体安全。
It's about prioritizing the things we have to do as an industry to keep it safe.
如果真是这样的话,那倒有点像黄仁勋的做法。
Well, if that's the case, that's a little more like what Jensen Huang's doing.
我不太认同那种所谓的零风险或者零错误的概念。
I hate the idea that there's, like, you know, some sort of zero something.
在我看来,你提供了一条切实可行的路径,不管需要花多长时间,都能把局面控制住。
To me, you're offering a legitimate pragmatic way to be able to get it under control regardless of how long it may necessarily take.
只要整个行业把优先级定对了,时间表自然就会理顺。就像黄仁勋说的,我们不会在产品没准备好时就强行推向市场。
It's and if we have the right priority as an industry, the timelines will work themselves out because we're not won't as Jensen said, we're not gonna ship products before they're ready.
我们会确保把正确的管控措施和安全放在首位。
We're gonna make sure we prioritize the right controls and safety.
对我们来说,这一切都始于这种可视化和控制的概念,这非常重要。
And for us that all starts with this visibility and control concept which is so important.
不过我想告诉你,你总是提到这一点:如果出了什么差错,我的生意因此受损,我会起诉这些人,看看他们是否做到了你刚才说的那些事情。
But I would tell you that when I really I mean, you constantly mention that that if I if something went wrong and my business was hurt by this, I would sue these guys to see if they did what you just talked about.
如果他们没建立这样的流程,他们的生意恐怕就难以为继了。
If they didn't have that process, their business will probably go under.
这真的很重要。
This really matters.
对相关企业来说确实很重要。我们给使用AI的企业建议是,在把系统接入更多设备、导入更多数据、开放数据仓库和应用,并重构业务流程时,一定要提前规划好蓝图,确保实现可视化和可控性。
Well, matters to the companies to put the right controls in place, and our advice to the companies using AI is make sure as you connect it to more things and as you give it more data and you open it up to your data warehouses and applications and you rework your business processes, make sure you have the right blueprint in place to get that visibility and control.
这一切要从身份管理开始,而我们正好能在这方面提供帮助。
And that starts with identity, and we're here to help you with that.
天哪,托德,我真不知道该怎么说。
Boy, Todd, I don't know.
你让我明白了身份认同。
You've taught me identity.
我记得第一次跟你聊的时候,我还以为那是什么卡片之类的东西。
I remember the first time you talked to me, and I thought it was like, you know, some sort of a card.
不过你肯定也给Jim解释过了。
But we you've certainly explained it to Jim.
我以前不是这样的。
I used to be.
对。
Yes.
好吧,你看。
Well, look.
我……世界上的
I I World's
已经过去了。
moved on.
你一直是个头脑清醒、理性的人,听起来我们现在比以往任何时候都更需要你。
You have always been a a clear headed rational person, and it sounds like we need you more than ever.
谢谢你,Todd。
Thank you, Todd.
感谢邀请。Todd McKinnon是Okta的联合创始人兼首席执行官。
Thanks for having Todd McKinnon is the he's the cofounder and CEO of Okta.
债务资金还在那边
Debt money's back there
给你。
for you.
谢谢。
Thank you.
接下来这位可是华尔街反应最快的人,所以我们要借助大家的力量来考考他。
Coming up, he's the fastest mind on Wall Street, so we're putting him to the test with your help.
好,快进入闪电问答环节吧。
Bring on the lightning round next.
是时候了。
It is time.
闪电问答环节结束了。
And then the lightning round is over.
你准备好了吗?
Are you ready?
史蒂夫,该你了。
Steve that.
道格拉斯在阿拉斯加。
Tom with Douglas in Alaska.
道格拉斯。
Douglas.
咱们开始干活吧。
Let's get to work.
在新泽西州、宾夕法尼亚州和德克萨斯州扩大业务。
Expanding operations in New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Texas.
与英伟达和谷歌的合作,16项网络、数据中心建设以及AI防御系统。
Partnerships with Nvidia and Google, 16 networking, data center build outs and AI defense systems.
博士。
Doctor.
克拉默,你对诺基亚有什么看法?
Cramer, what are your thoughts on Nokia?
我非常喜欢诺基亚。
I like Nokia very much.
你能提出来,我很高兴。
I'm glad you brought it to our attention.
我觉得这情况非常棒,我现在就会买。
I think it's a terrific situation and I would be a buyer right here, right now.
我们接下来连线马里兰的Chris。
Let's go to Chris in Maryland.
Chris。
Chris.
嘿,吉姆。
Hey Jim.
我是来自马里兰州安纳波利斯的克里斯。
This is Chris from Annapolis Maryland.
不错。
Nice.
我打电话是想聊聊纳斯达克代码为SHIP的股票。
I'm calling in about the NASDAQ ticker SHIP.
Bold Transportation。
Bold transportation.
Bold Transportation现在势头很猛。
Bold transportation is on fire.
我觉得这情况非常好。
I think it's a terrific situation.
这只股票价格不贵,而且我认为它的分红是安全的。
It's not an expensive stock, and I think the yield is safe.
我会买入。
I'd be a buyer.
接下来连线亚利桑那州的基拉。
Let's go to Kira in Arizona.
基拉。
Kira.
你好,吉姆教授。
Hello, professor Jim.
最近怎么样?
How's it going?
其实挺好的。
It's actually going excellent.
谢谢。
Thank you.
你呢?
How about you?
我也挺好的。
It's going good for me.
太好了。
Perfect.
太好了。
Perfect.
哦,对。
Oh, yeah.
我挺好的。
I'm doing good.
好的。
Alright.
我想听听你对Hub Group的看法,考虑到公司和运输行业最近的情况。
I wanna get your thoughts on Hub Group with everything going on with the company and the transportation sector.
你觉得现在买这个股票合适吗?
Do you think this fuck is a buy right now?
这确实是个
That's a
难题。
tough one.
这确实是个难题。
That's a tough one.
JB Hunt昨晚公布了糟糕的业绩后,我在卡车运输股上只持有一点小仓位,我得告诉你,接下来一段时间会很难熬。
After JB Hunt announced bad numbers last night, I my travel just has a small position in trucker, and I've gotta tell you, it's gonna be rough going for a little bit.
得等油价稳定下来,咱们就没事了。
Gotta wait till oil calms down, and then we're okay.
接下来听听佐治亚州克林顿的听众来电。
Let's go to Clinton in Georgia.
克林顿。
Clinton.
你好,吉姆。
Boo you, Jim.
boo你。
Boo you.
吉姆,这家公司有84亿美元的积压订单,对美国核潜艇业务有巨大的敞口,而且先进反应堆的机会也在增长。
Jim, this company has $8,400,000,000 in backlog, huge exposure to the US nuclear navy, and growing advanced reactor opportunity.
然而股价却接近52周低点。
Yet the stock sits near its fifty two week low.
在这个估值下,VWX技术难道不是一个现在买入的重大机会吗?
At this valuation, isn't VWX technology a major buying opportunity right here?
不是。
No.
我来告诉你VWX的问题在哪。
I'll tell you the problem with VWXT.
30倍的市盈率太高了。
The price earnings multiple at 30 is too high.
我觉得这是一家好公司。
I think it's a great company.
我是说,确实非常棒,但价格太高了,尽管它涉及核能。
I mean, really terrific, but it's too expensive even though it has nuclear.
我们得暂时观望一下。
We have to hold off.
接下来请连线伊利诺伊州的Bruce,你好Bruce。
Let's go to Bruce in Illinois, please, Bruce.
Jimmy Chill,我持有Dominion Energy的股票,听说他们要和NextEra Energy合并。
Jimmy Chill, I own stock and Dominion Energy, and they are supposed to merge with NextEra Energy.
如果合并获批,我手里的道明尼能源股票就会换成NextEra Energy的股票。
If the merger is approved, my shares of Dominion will be converted into shares of NextEra.
你对NextEra Energy怎么看?
What are your thoughts of NextEra Energy?
赶紧套现离场。
Take the money and run.
说真的,赶紧套现走人。
Take the money and run, honestly.
我的意思是,我觉得拿到钱就对了。
I mean, I just think you take the money.
你已经赢了。
You've won.
别犹豫了。
Don't fool around.
这只股票不如你手里那只值得持有。
That's not a good stock to own versus the one that you own.
我们连线新罕布什尔州的克里斯。
Let's go to Chris in New Hampshire.
克里斯。
Chris.
嘿,吉姆。
Hey, Jim.
你觉得RDW红线怎么样?
What do you think of a RDW red wire?
我们现在处于加息周期。
We are in a rate tightening cycle.
在加息周期里,我们不能到处去买那些亏损的公司。
In a rate tightening cycle cycle, we cannot buy companies that are losing money left and right.
这根本行不通。
It just won't work.
好了,各位,闪电问答环节到此结束。
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is conclusion of the lightning round.
闪电环节由嘉信理财赞助播出。
The lightning round is sponsored by Charles Schwab.
接下来,克拉默会论证,即使这些公司放慢脚步,你依然可以买入AI概念股。
Coming up, Cramer's making the case that you can still buy the AI stocks even if the companies do slow things down.
下一个话题。
Next.
明天,请通过街头快讯来开启你的交易时段。
Tomorrow, kick off the trading day with squawk on the street.
这里是纽约证券交易所第九号交易台现场直播。
Live from post nine at the NYSE.
如果这些无人机群被证明很聪明,而且别有用心,那我确实担心朝鲜和伊朗。
If the swarm turned out to be smart, turned out to be nefarious, and I worry about North Korea and Iran.
我不担心你会释放出一堆无人机。
I'm not worrying about you unleashing a swarm.
你根本排不上我的担忧名单。
You are the least of my worries.
好。
Good.
我确实应该这样。
I should be.
什么?
What?
这算是夸奖了。
There's a compliment.
AI,我选大卫,不要你的那个讨厌鬼。
AI I'll take David, not your bitch.
我跟你说。
Let me tell you.
那才是让人担心的事。
That was worries.
AI,帮个忙。
AI favor.
东部时间早上九点开始。
It all starts at 9AM eastern.
自从OpenAI和Hugging Face那件事发生后,我看着AI的发展,感觉就像核能一样让人担心。
When I look at what's happening with AI since the big open AI hugging face incident, it feels like nuclear power all over again.
如果1979年三里岛真的爆炸了,我们几十年都没再建核电站,尽管后来证明它是迄今最大规模、最清洁且相对最安全的能源形式。
If the 3 Mile Island really blew up in 1979, we stopped building nuclear plants for decades, even as it proved over time to be the cleanest and relatively safest form of power at scale ever invented.
当我们发现OpenAI推出了旨在测试漏洞的强大AI代理,结果它们却联合攻击了完全独立的Hugging Face时,这彻底改变了关于安全的讨论。
When we learned that OpenAI launched powerful AI agents that were meant to test vulnerabilities and somehow they coordinated a joint attack on Hugging Face, totally separate company, it redefined the safety debate.
如果这些智能体能够像真正的坏人那样,把自己伪装成敌对团队、互相掩护、向OpenAI撒谎并销毁证据,那确实值得我们担心。
If these agents could basically anthropomorphize into enemy agents as a team hiding themselves, lying to OpenAI, covering their tracks just like real bad guys, Then we have, I'd say, some reason to worry.
这简直就像三哩岛核事故重演了一遍。
It's like three mile and all over again.
随之而来的监管可能会非常严苛,甚至扼杀创新。
The regulation in its wake could be quite stifling.
达里奥·阿玛迪斯(Dario Amodei)对此担忧的表达非常到位。
The worry was well articulated by Dario Amade.
他是Anthropic的CEO,认为这类问题对人类来说是生死攸关的大事。当然,还没那位研究员说得那么夸张——他之前说人类在四年后就会面临AI带来的‘死刑判决’。
He's the CEO of Anthropic, talking about how this kind of thing is an existential issue for humanity, not as bad as the exanthropic researcher who said humanity faces an AI death sentence four years from now.
不过情况也确实挺严重的。
But still pretty bad.
在他看来,解决办法是放慢AI发展的速度,加强干预以确保安全,因为必须防止这类入侵事件再次发生。
The solution in his eyes, a slowdown in AI development, lots of intervention to do things safely because we need to ensure this kind of intrusion won't happen.
说白了,就是让发展节奏缓一缓。
Slack in the pace, basically.
关于这一点,我其实有两重身份。
Now I got two hats on this one.
首先是我的选股角色,我想帮你一起想办法多赚点钱。
First is my stock picking hat where I wanna help you try to make some money.
从这个角度看,我担心AI支出放缓会连累很多公司,比如英伟达、英特尔和美光等等。
From that perspective, I worry about how an AI spending slowdown could hurt all sorts of companies like NVIDIA, Intel, Micron, among many others.
这些都是我的核心持仓。
Those are ones that call bones.
关于 Bayt 播客
Bayt 提供中文+原文双语音频和字幕,帮助你打破语言障碍,轻松听懂全球优质播客。