本集简介
双语字幕
仅展示文本字幕,不包含中文音频;想边听边看,请使用 Bayt 播客 App。
如果你真的担心会出现大规模熊市,我会买债券。
If you're really worried about a massive bear market, I'd be buying bonds.
欢迎收听《Thoughtful Money》。
Welcome to Thoughtful Money.
我是《Thoughtful Money》的创始人和主持人塔格特,欢迎大家在周末收听本周市场回顾,今天请来的还是我的好朋友,那位我这周忘了给他想个形容词的投资组合经理。
I'm Thoughtful Money founder and your host, Taggart, welcoming you here at the end of the week for another weekly market recap featuring my good friend, the portfolio manager for whom I forgot to come up with an adjective this week.
兰斯·罗伯茨,兰斯,你还好吗?
Lance Roberts, Lance, how are doing?
我就是那个没有形容词的人。
I'm the no adjective guy.
我觉得这是头一回发生这种事。
I think it's the first time it's ever happened.
我也觉得是。
I think I think it is.
我们这节目做了多久了?
How long have we been doing this now?
大概四年了吧?
Like, four years?
兰斯,我觉得可能快五年了。
Lance, I think it's maybe closer to five.
有可能。
It could be.
我是说,你知道,我每天都在变老。
I mean, you know, I'm I'm getting closer to death every day.
我知道。
So I know.
而且我记不太清了,因为我们做这个做得太久了。
And I can't really remember because we're getting so well doing this.
我的记忆
My memory
就是,就是。
is exactly exactly.
我们其实已经把形容词用完了。
We just actually we just ran out of adjectives.
就是这么回事。
That's that's the thing.
对,我们连词典都用光了。
Yeah, we have used the dictionary.
真的没词了。
There are no more words.
好吧。
All right.
大家可能也听出来了,我现在在路上。
Well, as folks can tell, I am on the road here.
我在美丽的加州弗雷斯诺。
I am in beautiful Fresno, California.
昨晚我在这里参加了一个私人活动。
I was here for a private event last night.
兰斯,先简单聊聊这个吧。
Talk for a moment about it, Lance.
但我昨晚确实和一位博士共度了时光。
But I got to spend the evening with Doctor.
托马斯·哈尼格,他是堪萨斯城联邦储备银行的前任首席执行官,后来在伯南克时代担任联邦公开市场委员会的委员。
Thomas Hanig, who was the former CEO of the Kansas City Federal Reserve, then served on the Federal Open Markets Committee during the Bernanke era.
他实际上和现任美联储主席凯文·沃尔什一起工作过。
He actually served with Kevin Walsh, who was the now current Fed chair.
他还曾担任联邦存款保险公司的董事。
He was a director of the FDIC.
他现在在市场中心工作。
He now works at the Market Center.
你知道,他真的是那种参与过最重要经济政策决策的人。
Such a, you know, a guy who's truly been in the room in making some of the most important economic policy decisions.
所以,他对美联储以及内部运作非常了解。
And so, you know, very knowledgeable about the Federal Reserve and how things operate on D.
对。
C.
他是那种,你们看过我采访他的人都知道,真希望华盛顿能有更多像他这样的人来管事。
The kind of guy for those of you who have seen me interview him, we just wish there were a lot more kind of, you know, running the show in Washington.
他离开后,确实很难再找到像他这样的人了,而且他也是世界上最和善的人之一。
They they they certainly broke the mold when when he left, but also just one of the nicest guys in the world.
兰斯,昨晚能和他共度一晚,真的是莫大的荣幸。
Lance, really, truly a real privilege to be able to spend the evening with him last night.
太好了。
Nice.
而且我觉得,简单来说,他对美联储以及我们很多政府机构过去几十年制定的政策,批评得非常严厉。
And I think just very quickly, he is as critical as of the Fed and a lot of our, you know, our government institutions in terms of policies that have been set over the past many decades.
但他仍然保留了一些乐观,认为或许有办法解决债务问题,减少未来美元购买力的下降幅度。
He does retain some optimism that there may be a way to address these issues dealing with the debt, reducing the amount of diminishment of purchasing power of the dollar going forward.
但他也承认,这是一项非常非常艰巨的任务。
But he admits it's a very, very heavy lift.
显然,有很多事情需要顺利进行,华盛顿的运作方式也需要和现在不一样。
And there's a lot of things that obviously would need to go right and need to work differently in Washington than do so now.
他确实这么认为。
He does.
你知道,他认识他们本人。
You know, he knows them personally.
我觉得他对凯文·沃尔什和财政部长斯科特·贝森特都有很高的评价。
He does, I think, have a very high opinion of both Kevin Walsh and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessant.
所以他认为,如果有能胜任这项任务的人,我们已经把他们安排到位了。
So he thinks if if there are gentlemen who are up to the task, we've got them in place.
问题是,他们能否真正产生影响?
The question is, is will they be able to affect this?
谁知道呢?
And who knows?
我们会一直关注,并在过程中为他们加油。
And we'll be watching and kind of rooting along the way.
关键的是,他昨晚说了很多,但我从中领悟到的最重要的一点是——
The key thing, I mean, there's awful lot he said last night, but the key thing that I think that I took away from from his.
从他的展望和他认为需要做的事情来看,一切都围绕着华盛顿能否实现财政纪律。
Outlook and what he thinks needs to happen, it all basically revolves around whether we're going to get any fiscal discipline in Washington.
而且,如果你像我一样,你可能对此不抱太大希望。
And, you know, if you're like me, you don't hold a lot of hope for that.
但这就是需要改变的地方。
But that that is the thing that that needs to change.
实际上,他认为美联储现在的角色就是充当房间里的成年人,告诉国会:听着,我不会像过去那样把你的债务货币化,所以你们需要控制开支。
And really, what he sees the role of the Fed right now is really being the adult in the room and telling Congress, look, I'm not going to monetize your debt the way I have in the past, and therefore you need to get your spending under control.
这会发生吗?
Is that going to happen?
谁知道呢?
Who knows?
我敢肯定评论区里会有很多人说,对,除非太阳从西边出来。
I'm sure in the comments section, there's a lot of people here say, like, yeah, when pigs fly.
但看起来,如果我们想摆脱困境,那确实是必须发生的关键部分。
But it does seem that if we're going to get out of this, that's the that's the essential component that needs to happen.
有趣的是,1985年他们就在讨论同样的话题。
And what's funny about that is they were having that same conversation in 1985.
我知道。
I know.
1995年,2008年。
1995, 2008.
所以,你知道,这种对财政纪律的呼吁是年年都有的事。
So, you know, this this is, you know, these cries for fiscal discipline is is a perennial thing.
而且,就像你说的,我是说,不,我是说,这不会发生的。
And again, to your point, I mean, no, I mean, it's not gonna happen.
政治里钱太多了,所以不可能发生。
And there's too much money in politics for it to happen.
所以,你知道,这整个就像那个吹笛人,说嘿,只要你跟着我走财政纪律这条路,一切都会好起来的。
So there's no, there you know this whole kind of it's a it's a it's a you know it's kind of the pied piper you know saying hey if you just follow my pathway of doing physical discipline you know things will be all better.
但是有些国家试过,结果非常糟糕。
But countries have tried it and it worked out horribly.
希腊试过,差点把国家毁了。
Greece tried it, it almost destroyed the country.
所以我们有个宏伟的想法,觉得需要控制财政,但大家都忘了,大部分经济增长其实来自那些支出。
And so we have this grand vision of that we need to come under a physical this one, but everybody forgets that most of the economic growth comes from that spending.
因为那些支出最终都流入了经济中。
And because all that spending winds up in the economy.
所以,支持这些措施当然很好。
So you know it's great to root for these things.
这周早些时候我在我的节目里也聊过这个。
And I was talking about this on my show earlier this week.
你知道,看着人们说“哦,美联储在加息”挺有意思的。
You know it's interesting to watch people go, oh yes, the Fed's raising rates.
这很好。
This is great.
他们要去对付通胀了。
They're gonna go after inflation.
那太棒了。
That's awesome.
美联储对油价无能为力。
The Fed can't do anything about oil prices.
他们也没办法在很大程度上控制数据中心支出对ISM或制造业的影响。
They can't do anything about, you know, data center spending to any great degree feeding into ISM or manufacturing.
那些是……
Those are...
那只是经济活动。
That's just economic activity.
他们能做的就是提高美国消费者的借贷成本。
What they can do is raise the cost of borrowing for the American consumer.
所以,通过让普通美国人的生活更艰难,就能解决通胀问题,因为这会压制经济中的需求,把经济推向衰退,从而降低利率,进而降低通胀。
So by making the lives of average Americans more difficult, solves your inflation problem because you crush demand within the economy and you push the economy towards a recession, brings interest rates down, that brings inflation down.
所以为这些事情加油是好事。
So it's great to root for these things.
但同样重要的是要记住,当你得到你期望的东西时,你的生活同时也会变得非常艰难。
But it's also it's also very important to remember that when you get the thing that you wish for, your life is going to be very difficult at the same time.
是的,你现在必须意识到这一点。
Yes, you have you have to be aware of that now.
你知道,我有点同意你的观点。
You know, I would I kind of agree with your point.
我的意思是,我觉得,听着,我们不会为持续的财政挥霍加油。
I mean, I think, look, we're not going to be rooting for fiscal continued fiscal profligacy.
而且好像有人在试图提出这种论点。
And like anybody's trying to make that argument.
汤姆非常清楚地说,看,你知道,这两个机构,财政部和美联储,如果他们真的实施了汤姆认为需要实施的政策,他说,你必须非常小心实施的方式和速度,否则你做得太快。
And Tom Tom was very cognizant of saying, look, you know, these two organizations, Treasury and Fed, if they actually engineer what Tom thinks needs to be engineered, he said, you got be very careful about the way you do it and the pace you do it because otherwise you do it too fast.
你基本上会让经济陷入心脏骤停。
You you send the economy basically into cardiac arrest.
对。
That's right.
所以,
So,
你知道,再说,国会有可能拿出财政上的骨气吗?
you know, again, is there likelihood of congress, you know, developing a fiscal backbone?
我觉得这种可能性真的很低,但与此同时,我们一直在沿着这条路走下去。
I think the odds on that are really low but at the same time, we keep running down this trajectory.
我们知道最终会走向哪里。
We know eventually where it's going to end.
他并不是说我们
He's not saying we're
会陷入
going to get
其中。
into it.
那我们赶紧来聊聊这个。
So let's let's run that real quick.
这最终会走向哪里?
Where is this eventually going to end?
嗯,我觉得长远来看,要么陷入主权债务危机,要么就是货币的购买力被摧毁得太厉害,最终可能会走到一个新局面,民众会拿起干草叉说,我真的撑不下去了。
Well, I think eventually down the road, you get into either a sovereign debt crisis and or you've just, you know, destroyed so much of the purchasing power of the currency that, you know, eventually probably you get you get a new position where the pitchforks come out and the masses say, look, you know, I just can't do it anymore.
后者是有可能的。
Ladder is possible.
前者可能不太可能,只要我们还是储备货币。
Former is probably not possible as long as we remain the reserve currency.
而且记住,我们的债务与GDP之比实际上在改善,因为第三季度经济增长非常强劲。
And remember, our debt to GDP ratio is a function that's actually improving because we're getting a lot of very strong economic growth, economic growth in the third quarter.
第三季度是5%。
Third quarter is 5%.
我昨晚提过这个。
I brought this up last night.
所以再说一遍,你知道,所有这些事情,AI在做什么,所有这些数据中心的开支,实际上都在改善基本面。
So again, you know, all this thing, you know, what what AI is doing, all this data center spending is actually improving the underlying fundamentals.
而人们只盯着债务,他们忽略的是,他们把债务看作一个数字,对吧。
And what people are missing by focusing on the debt is they're looking at debt as a number, right.
就像,哦,那是40万亿。
It's like, oh, it's 40,000,000,000,000.
好吧,是40万亿美元。那是什么意思呢?
Okay, it's $40,000,000,000,000 What does that mean?
你得把它放到某种形式里,就像,你看,你刚买了房子,对吧。
You to put it into some form of kind of like, look, you just bought a house, right.
所以如果我问,你的房子多少钱?
So if I said, well, how much is your house?
你说,嗯,那是1000万美元的房子。亚当没买1000万美元的房子,但咱们先拿这个数字来说。
You say, well, it was a $10,000,000 Adam didn't buy a $10,000,000 house, but let's just use the number for a second.
我戴上单片眼镜,然后我们可以说。
Just put on my monocle and taught that and we can say.
没错。
Exactly.
所以亚当说他刚买了一栋一千万美元的房子,我们就说,哦,亚当破产了。
So Adam says I just bought a $10,000,000 house and we go, oh, Adam's bankrupt.
他在这栋房子上背了一千万美元的房贷。
He's got a $10,000,000 mortgage on this house.
但你得看看亚当的净资产是多少。
But you have to look at it in terms of what's Adam's net worth.
亚当的净资产是一亿美元。
Adam's net worth is $100,000,000
或者在你这种情况下可能更多,我一年赚两千万美元。
Or probably more in your case, I'm making $20,000,000 a year.
因为你说的是债务占GDP的比例。
Because you're talking about debt to GDP.
当然。
Sure.
所以你一年赚两千万美元。
So you're making $20,000,000 a year.
所以重点是这些数字,而且你看,我不是在反驳你的观点。
So the point is that these numbers and look, I'm not arguing your point.
我的意思是,你看,我们不能继续这样花钱了。
I mean, look, we can't keep spending the way that we're doing.
这一点我百分之百同意。
Absolutely agree with that 100%.
但同样重要的是,要把事情放在具体背景下来看,看看这些钱在经济中到底发生了什么。
But it's also important to put things into a contextual format of what's actually happening with that money within the economy.
这些钱不是白白流走,再也见不到了。
This isn't money that is just going out the window and nobody ever sees again.
这是短期刺激,正在被花掉。
This is it's a it's a short term stimulus is getting spent.
我们昨晚谈过这个,我也确实提到过,你看,经济增长,提高经济增长能解决很多问题。
We talked about this last night and I did bring up the fact that, look, you know, economic growth, increasing economic growth cures a lot of ills.
所以如果我们突然转向一个更高的经济增长基线,债务占GDP的比例就会下降,我们就能把这个游戏玩得更久,这就是政府策略的一部分。
So if we all of a sudden shift to a baseline of higher economic growth and debt to GDP comes down and we can we can play this game a lot longer, that's what the administration's as part of their playbook.
我的意思是,他们从一开始就非常明确这一点。
I mean, they've been very clear about that from day one.
不管是他们的努力,还是AI,还是两者的结合,我们短期内确实看到了更高的经济增长,至少第三季度是这样。
And whether it's their efforts, whether it's a I, whether it's a combination of both, we are seeing in the immediate term here higher economic growth, at least here in the third quarter.
现在,Lance,这个故事要有一个好结局,这种增长必须持续下去。
Now, Lance, that's got to continue for this story to continue to have a good outcome.
不,完全正确。
No, that's exactly.
不,完全正确。
No, that's exactly right.
而且最棒的是,我觉得很多人忽略的是,债务有两种,对吧?
And the beautiful thing, really, the thing that I think a lot of people are overlooking is, is so there's two forms of debt, right?
有非生产性债务,还有……所以如果政府要继续花钱,他们可以通过增加生产性支出来改善他们的支出习惯。
There's nonproductive debt and there's So pretty good if the government's going to keep spending, right, they could improve their spending habits by doing more productive spending.
这个我之前就说过。
And this is something I've argued for before.
我们现在在能源供应方面有很大的缺口,对吧。
We have a huge gap in the energy provision right now, right.
所以我们的电网,如果要支持未来所有这些AI数据中心建设,我们的电网已经严重老化,需要升级来满足不断增长的需求。
So our electrical grid, if we're going to support all this AI data center build out stuff for the future, our electrical grid is grossly aged and needs to be upgraded to accommodate for all the successive usage.
而且我们还需要更多的电力。
And then we also need more power.
我们就是需要更多的电力。
We just need more power.
这些数据中心都在争抢各种电力连接,不管是涡轮机、发电机、小型核反应堆、天然气,还是别的什么,他们就是想要为这些数据中心获得所需的电力。
These data centers are scrambling for all types of power connections, whether it's turbines or generators or small nuclear reactors, gas, whatever it is, they're just trying to get the power they need for these data centers.
这对政府来说是个好机会,可以说,嘿,你知道吗,我们要和公用事业公司建立公私合作关系,在全国范围内重建我们的电网。
Well, this is a great opportunity for the government to say, hey, you know what, we're gonna go into a public private partnership with utility companies to rebuild our power grid across the nation.
这是生产性投资,今天就能让人们就业,今天就能创造收入。
That's productive investment puts people to work today, creates revenue today.
而且将来,人们使用这些电力是要付费的。
And then in the future, people have to pay for the use of that power.
所以花在电网上的那些钱,将来会持续带来收入。
So that spending that was on that power grid, that electrical grid continues to pay out revenue all into the future.
所以那些债务,随着时间推移,会变成一种创收的过程。
So all that debt that was spent becomes an income generation process over time.
就像我们建胡佛水坝那样,田纳西河流域管理局也是这么干的。
Thing we did with the Hoover Dam, same thing we did with Tennessee River Valley Authority.
如果政府把更多钱花在能产生效益的地方,经济就能增长得更强劲,债务占GDP的比例问题也会小得多,因为这是生产性债务,而不是非生产性债务。
If the government would focus more productive spending in the economy, you could create stronger economic growth and your debt to GDP issue becomes much less less more problematic because it's productive debt versus nonproductive debt.
对。
Yep.
我完全同意。
I totally agree.
你知道吗,我觉得在某些方面,政府似乎已经明白了这个道理。
You know, I think you can argue that on certain areas there, I think the government's getting the memo.
我们确实在采取很多措施来鼓励增加这个国家的电力生产能力,那将会非常棒。
We certainly are doing a lot of things to encourage the increase in this nation's electrical production capacity, which would be fantastic.
对吧,兰斯?
Right, Lance?
我现在不想深入讨论,但我想重申,这里的大问题是A的回报会是什么。
And I don't want to get into it right now, but I just want to reiterate the big question here is what will the return on A.
I。
I.
B。
B.
而且我觉得,你知道,我们不知道。
And I think that's, you know, we don't know.
我们要么为我们将得到的东西过度支出,至少在短期内是这样,要么我们面前将有一个巨大的繁荣,就像你一直是那些说‘嘿,留意这个,因为你先投资,然后以后再收获好处’的人之一。
We are either overspending for what we're going to get, at least in the in the near term, or we are going to have a phenomenal boom ahead of us, as you have been one of the people to say, hey, keep an eye out for this because you invest first and then you reap the benefits later on.
所以,你知道,我认为现在最大的未解问题,而且我对此没有内部消息,就是I在未来几年内是会让人失望还是让人高兴,就投资回报而言。
So, you know, I think the big open question right now, and I don't have an inside track on it, is is I going to disappoint or delight in the next couple of years in terms of its return on investment?
没错。
That's right.
没错。
That's right.
你看,没人知道。
And look, nobody knows.
而且对看空的人来说。
And there's for the bears.
是的。
Yes.
绝对有可能在某个时候,这东西整个崩掉然后反弹。
There is a absolute possibility at some point this thing just entirely falls apart and raises up.
那都是一时热潮。
It was all a fad.
但为了说得非常清楚。
But just to be super clear.
是的,那是有可能的。
Yes, that's a possibility.
更可能的情况是像互联网泡沫那样,就是说,这个东西可能会带来惊人的回报,但那是十五到二十年后的事了,我们现在就得根据这个重新调整价格。
The more likely is the dotcom thing, which is like, oh, this thing may deliver phenomenal returns, but they're fifteen, twenty years away and we've got to readjust today's pricing for that.
对。
That's right.
那当然也是另一种结果。
That's that's certainly another outcome.
然后还有另一种结果,就是它按预期运行。
And then there's the other outcome, which is that it works as expected.
经历这个转型,然后你就能获得增长。
And have this transition and you get the growth.
所以你知道,没有人,没有人知道结果会是什么。
So you know, there's nobody but nobody knows what that outcome is gonna be.
这就是为什么我觉得从投资的角度来看,你必须利用那个机会。
And that's why I think from an investment standpoint, you have to take advantage of what that opportunity is.
现在有很多新兴公司正在崛起,未来很可能会成为AI领域的重要玩家。
There's a lots of emerging companies that are coming right now that are gonna be probably very major players in AI in the future.
这些就是你要抓住的投资机会。
And those are your investment opportunities that you wanna get ahold of.
但如果你太担心的话——其实我上周一刚写了一篇文章,讲的是把乐观当作投资策略。
But if you're so worried, and in fact, I just wrote an article this past Monday talking about optimism as an investment strategy.
如果你对一切都太悲观,你就不会抓住眼前的机会,最终在市场上赚不到钱。
If you're so pessimistic on everything, you won't take advantage of those opportunities that are sitting right in front of And wind up not making money in the markets.
而大多数投资者犯的大错就是,他们过于悲观,陷入看跌情绪,结果不敢投资。
And this is the big mistake that most investors make is they have this very pessimistic bearish binge that keeps them from investing.
统计研究也证明了这一点,对吧?
The statistical studies show this out, right?
如果你把乐观的人和悲观的人分成两组,悲观的人的表现会远远落后于那些对市场和未来持更乐观态度的人,因为市场有75%的时间是上涨的。
If you take a group of optimistic people and pessimistic people, pessimistic people underperform by a large degree relative to people that have a more optimistic outlook for markets and futures because markets are up 75% of the time.
我想先在这里停一下,因为我确实想和你聊聊那篇文章。
I want to just put a pin in that because I do want to talk with you about that article.
所以我们稍微晚了一点。
So we're just a little bit later.
这里有个有趣的点。
Just an interesting point here.
而且我们有很多内容要讨论。
And there's a lot we got to get to discuss.
各位,我一开始就应该说的。
And folks, I should have said this the beginning.
我没有太多时间,因为我得开车送博士。
I don't have a ton of time to do so because I got to drive Doctor.
去机场,稍微有点远。
Hanuk to the airport a little bit.
所以今天的节目会比平时短一些。
So today's is going to be a bit shorter than normal.
我觉得未来有个有趣的讨论话题,我在想请谁来聊比较合适,就是AI的发展和冷战时期核武器的发展有很多相似之处,你知道,谁先造出核弹,谁拥有最强大的核武库,很明显谁就会成为下一个世界超级大国,对吧?
I think an interesting discussion to have in the future, and I'm trying to think of who would be a good person to bring on to talk about it is there's a lot of similarities we can draw between the AI build out and the nuclear the nuclear weapons build out from back during the Cold War where, you know, whoever whoever was able to develop nukes first and develop the the greatest nuclear arsenal, it was pretty clear it was going to become the world's next superpower, right?
美国和苏联基本上赢得了那场竞赛,对吧。
And The US and The USSR, The USA and The USSR basically won that race, Right.
那段时间里,它们就是两个超级大国,基本上是因为它们能同时摧毁对方和世界上的其他地方。
That that that's we had a period of time where they were the two superpowers and basically because they could destroy each other and the rest of the world at the same time.
希望不会像那样。
Hopefully, isn't as.
你知道,虽然这个类比没那么严重,但基本上,谁先开发出领先的AI,谁就会对世界上其他国家拥有巨大的优势。
You know, dire analog is that, but basically, whoever comes up with, you know, the whoever develops winning AI is going to have a massive advantage over all the other countries in the world.
这不一定是一场赢家通吃的游戏。
It's not necessarily a winner take all game.
可能会出现两个AI超级大国。
You could have an emergence of two AI superpowers.
现在看起来就是这样的趋势,美国。
That seems to be the track run right now with The U.
和美国。
S.
还有中国。
And China.
中国现在的发电能力比我们美国强多了。
China right now is way more electrical production capacity than we do in The U.
对。
S.
但我们已经意识到了,正在拼命追赶。
But we've gotten the memo and we're scrambling to catch up.
我们的数据中心比他们多得多。
We've got way more data centers than they do.
而且至少目前,我们的芯片更好。
And we've got, at least for now, we've got the better chips.
但基本上,美国和中国之间正在进行一场激烈的竞赛。
But basically, there's this massive race between The U.
对。
S.
还有中国。
And China.
我想说的是,这可能就像互联网一样。
And where I'm going with this is is probably like the Internet.
A.
A.
I.
I.
希望它能彻底改变每个人的未来。
Will will hopefully revolutionize the future for everybody.
但是,拥有主导计算份额和最好技术的国家,将会远远领先于那些没有这种技术的任何公司或国家。
But the country that has the dominant share of compute and the best technology is going to be very far ahead of of any company, any country that doesn't have that technology.
而且在我看来,兰斯,现在看起来好像会是美国。
And it looks to me right now, Lance, that like it's going to be The U.
S.
S.
而中国呢。
Versus China.
所以我真的很想知道欧洲那些地方会怎么样。
So I'm really curious to see what's going to happen with places like Europe and whatnot.
俄罗斯可能又是一个例子,他们就是没在做这种投资。
Russia maybe is another example where they're just not making this investment.
他们现在也负担不起这种投资。
They can't afford to be making this investment right now.
五年、十年、十五年后,他们会落后多少?因为他们没有那些电力强国所拥有的计算能力和电力生产能力。
How much further behind are they going to be in five, ten, fifteen years because they don't have the compute and the electrical production capacity that the electrical superpowers have.
嗯,这确实是个很好的观点。
Well, and then that's a really great point.
这也是我们一直保持国际配置偏低的原因之一。
And this is also goes to one of the reasons why we remain and have remained underweight internationally.
今年早些时候,大家都说,哦,我们得投资国际和新兴市场。
Earlier this year, everybody was like, oh, we got to be international and emerging markets.
他们会主宰世界的。
They're gonna dominate the world.
我们想说,嘿,小心那个说法,因为他们有很多问题。
We're like, hey, be careful with that story because they have a lot of problems.
特别是新兴市场,非常依赖美国的消费。
On emerging markets in particular, very dependent on The US for consumption.
他们是出口国,我们是进口国。
They're an exporter, we're an importer.
国际市场,特别是像法国、德国这样的国家,没有投资于自己的经济。
International markets, particularly countries like France, Germany, etc, not invested in their economy.
所以从经济角度看,他们未来的增长率会更慢,对吧。
So their growth rates are going be slower the future economically speaking, right.
所以你需要经济增长来创造盈利增长。
And so you need economic growth to create earnings growth.
所以我一直有点,我们确实有一个国际投资组合。
So I've been really kind of, we do have an international portfolio.
所以我没有投资这些国家,因为我们的投资组合是专门分配给国际市场的。
So I'm not invested in these countries because we have a portfolio that's solely allocated towards international markets.
但我认为这是未来你肯定想要低配的事情之一。
But I think it's one of those things you definitely want to underweight going in the future.
特别是像德国和法国这样的国家,尤其是德国,基本上放弃了所有的核电生产,试图转向太阳能,基本上全是太阳能和风能。
And this is particularly the case with countries like Germany and France that have especially Germany, which basically just got rid of all their nuclear production and tried to go solar, basically all kind of solar and wind.
而这对他们来说结果非常糟糕。
And that's just worked out horribly for them.
当然,还有乌克兰和俄罗斯的问题,他们很多电力供应非常依赖俄罗斯的天然气。
And of course, this whole issue with Ukraine, Russia, they were very dependent on Russian gas for a lot of their power provision.
所以这确实影响了他们的经济,而且未来还会继续影响他们,更不用说他们的政策一直在侵蚀经济增长了。
So that's really impacted their economy and that's going to continue to impact them going forward, not to mention just their policies that have been eroding economic growth.
但你说得对,他们并没有在这些方面进行投资。
But to your point, no, they're not making these investments into A.
这最终会让他们远远落后,当他们意识到的时候,就会想,哦,糟糕,我们现在得赶紧追赶了。
I, which is going to leave them very far behind the curve when they eventually realize is like, oh crap, we got to play catch up now.
有趣的是,我也就是随口说说,不过……
And what's interesting is and I'm just thinking out loud here, but.
就像现在,你知道,中国正拿稀土卡世界很多国家的脖子,对吧?
Just like right now, you know, China is is using rare earths as a choke point for a lot of the rest of the world, right?
说实话,我们对中国也在做类似的事,对吧?
And honestly, we're doing the same thing to China with stuff, right?
我们不给他们最好的芯片,对吧?
We don't give them our best chips, right?
我能看到计算能力有可能变成……
We're I can see the potential for compute to become.
我也不确定,是不是该说被武器化。
I don't know, I necessarily want to say weaponized.
但基本上,如果世界上有两个主要的计算超级大国,其他国家都得从他们那里买计算能力,那这就可能变成一个非常强大的政策工具。
But like basically, if there's two main compute superpowers and the rest of the world is is buying that compute from them, it becomes potentially a really powerful policy tool.
比如说,嘿,我们想跟你们国家做点贸易,或者干点别的什么。
Hey, we want to do X, Y, Z, trade with your country or whatever.
我们想进行这次军事行动。
We want to do this military incursion.
我们希望你能支持我们。
We want you to support us.
哦,你不支持我们。
Oh, you're not on board with us.
哎呀,抱歉。
Jeez, sorry.
你现在用的那些电脑。
That computer you're getting right now.
要是没了,或者少给你一些,那多可惜啊,对吧?
Maybe it should be a shame if that went away if you got less of that, right?
这真的会很有意思。
It's just going to be really interesting.
所以,总之,如果你能帮我想到一个合适的人来聊这些,我很乐意去采访他们。
So, anyways, if you can help me think of a good person to talk about all that, I'd I'd be happy to interview them.
还有一件事,我想简单提一下,回到货币方面。
One other thing I just want to note real quick back to the monetary side of things.
你知道,汤姆,汤姆,他的想法和我们一样,我们聊了很多关于导致美联储和国会现在这种财政和货币双重宽松局面的原因。
So, you know, Tom Tom, know, he thinks like like we do and you know, we talked a lot about what led to the both joint sort of fiscal and monetary profligacy of of the Fed and certainly with Congress where we are now.
这是一个连续的过程。
And it was a continuum.
你知道,这是一条路,路上有很多不同的里程碑,为现在的局面奠定了基础。
You know, it a pathway where there were a lot of different milestones that that just laid the groundwork for where we are.
但有一个重要的里程碑。
But an important one.
不过我不想和你在这上面争论太多,兰斯。
And I don't want to get into a huge debate with you on this, Lance.
但那就是放弃金本位,因为金本位是系统的一个制约。
But but was, you know, going off the gold standard in the sense that that was a governor on the system.
它防止你凭空印钱。
It prevented you from just printing money out of thin air.
但最终我们还是走到了这一步,成立了美联储,它基本上可以凭空创造新的货币供应。
But we have we have eventually gotten to the point where we created the Federal Reserve, which which essentially can conjure new money supply into existence.
然后当我们逐步让国家脱离金本位时,我们实际上让国会决定要花多少钱,而美联储愿意为其兜底。
And then when when we progressively took the country off the gold standard, we enabled Congress to basically be responsible for how much it was going to spend with the Fed that was willing to backstop it.
因此,人类基本上总是在不断改变规则。
And therefore, humans basically are always moving the goalposts.
我们只是到了一个赤字常年存在的境地。
We just got to a point where, you know, deficits were just perennial.
总之,我提到这个是因为我采访过多次的嘉宾朱迪·谢尔顿,她在特朗普第一任期内曾被推荐到美联储任职。
So anyways, I just mentioned this because somebody who I've also interviewed a number of times on the show, Judy Shelton, who was was recommended in Trump's first administration for the Federal Reserve.
但投票从未进行过。
But there was no of the vote was never held.
然后拜登一上台,就撤回了她的提名。
And then when Biden came in, he took away her nomination.
但她大概两天前刚被聘为财政部长斯科特·贝森特的顾问。
But she was just hired, I think, like two days ago to be a counselor to Secretary Scott Bessant.
所以她现在在财政部有个职位了。
So she now has a role at Treasury.
而且,你知道,她一直非常关注货币纪律之类的事情。
And, you know, she's been somebody who's been very focused on monetary discipline and whatnot.
兰斯,看到我们一直在采访的这些有趣的思想家,真的很有意思。
It's just really interesting to see some of these these interesting thinkers that we've been talking to, Lance.
他们现在开始逐渐靠近核心决策圈了。
They're now getting kind of pulled closer into the center of the action, what's going on.
所以我联系了朱迪,就是为了感谢她。
So I've reached out to Judy just to thank her.
她确认了这件事确实在发生。
She confirmed that it's indeed happening.
虽然不知道结果会怎样,但很高兴我们Thoughtful Money有一位成员,现在正积极参与其中,希望能影响未来的政策。
Not sure what's going to come of it, but it's nice that we've got a Thoughtful Money faculty member who is who is now getting actively involved in and hopefully influencing policy going forward.
是的,你边听边点头。好吧,我就是觉得这消息挺酷的。
Yes, you're nodding be musically as I'm saying this, Okay, I just thought that was a pretty cool bit of news.
我觉得这很棒。
I think it's I think it's great.
你说过你不想要它。
You said you didn't want it.
但你要记住,关于金本位,现在没有哪个国家在用金本位。
But you have to remember about the gold standard is that there's nobody on the gold standard.
我知道。
I know.
这个话题我们以后再聊。
Let's have this conversation later.
我明白。
I understand.
让大家明白一下,我们不用金本位的原因,是因为它会阻碍货币供应量的增加。
Just so everybody understands, the reason we're not on the gold standard is because it impedes the increase in monetary supply.
如果M2货币供应量无法增加,经济就没法增长。
And if you don't have the ability for M2 monetary supply to increase, you can't grow the economy.
是的,确实。
Yeah, it's
你说得对,它确实能约束支出。
a good governor for spending to your point.
这一点我完全同意。
No argument with that at all.
但重要的是要明白,为什么现在没有任何国家采用金本位,就是因为金本位下经济无法增长。
It's just important to understand that there's a reason that nobody anywhere is on the gold standard is because you can't grow an economy on a gold standard.
对。
Yes.
或者说,无法增长。
Or you can't.
是的,任何事情都有利有弊。
Yeah, there are there are upsides and downsides to everything here.
而这就是其中一个大问题。
And that's a big one of that.
现在这确实是个约束,当然,对政客们来说。
It's a constraint now, of course, politicians.
我们现在哪里都不用它,原因之一就是政客们意识到他们可以把它废除掉。
One of the reasons why we don't have it anywhere anymore is because politicians realize they could get rid of it.
他们就说,嘿,如果能废掉这东西,那就废掉吧,因为对政客来说这太没意思了。
And they said, hey, if we can get rid of this thing, let's get rid of it because it is no fun for a politician.
没错。
Exactly.
好。
Okay.
行。
All right.
那我们来说说今天早上的大新闻。
So let's talk about this morning's big news.
今天公布的非农就业数据出奇地少,而且之前的数据也被下修了。
So we had a very surprisingly small payroll print today and some downward revisions of previous data.
现在市场显然在解读这个数据,认为未来加息的次数会比前几天预期的少很多。
And the market is now apparently interpreting this as Okay, we're going to have a lot fewer rate hikes going forward than we were pricing in just the other day.
我们现在看到很多资产正在实时对此做出反应。
And we're seeing a whole bunch of assets respond to that in real time right now.
除了我刚才提到的,这个就业数据报告还有什么值得讨论的吗?
Anything beyond what I just mentioned there that's worth talking about the payroll printlance?
嗯,我觉得你漏掉了更大的问题,就是9月30号。
Well, I think you missed the bigger issue, which was September 30.
那天我们看到了PCE的修正数据。
We had the revisions to PCE.
9月30号,那是两天前了。
September 30, that was two days ago.
对,那我们来看看。
Yeah, so let's see.
PCE数据低于预期,当时……
PCE was lower than expected when it
公布的时候。
came out.
不,这些不是PCE报告。
No, these are so this wasn't a report of PC.
这是对数据的修正。
This was the revisions to the data.
所以我错过了PCE数据的修正,公布的数字比大家预期的要低,这算是好消息。
So I missed the revisions to the PCA print was lower than folks were expecting, which was kind of good news.
这些修正告诉我们什么?
What are the revisions telling us?
修正把平均通胀率降到了1.6%。
So the revisions brought down the average rate of inflation down to 1.6%.
之前的PCE报告都被大幅下调,这真的表明美联储加息是个错误,因为除了油价飙升外,PCE并没有上涨。
And the previous PCE reports were all revised much lower, which really suggests that the Fed is making a mistake by hiking here because outside of an oil price spike, PCE is not increasing.
而PCE是他们衡量通胀的主要指标。
And PCE is their primary measure of inflation.
展开剩余字幕(还有 480 条)
所以再说吧,看看接下来会发生什么。
So again, we'll see what happens.
但这确实表明,市场迫使美联储加息,而实际上根本不应该加息。
But it does certainly suggest that the market pushed the Fed into hiking rates, and it really shouldn't have.
我们之前说过,在油价飙升时加息是个危险的游戏,因为你是在为未来制定货币政策,加息会加剧对消费者的负面影响,而消费者已经在承受高油价和家庭资产负债表上的压力。
We talked about before, hiking into an oil price spike is a dangerous game because, again, you're setting monetary policy for the future and you're hiking rates, you're increasing the negative impact on consumers which are already suffering from high oil prices and that input into the household balance sheet.
所以在这种环境下,经济破坏的速度会快得多。
So that creation of economic destruction happens much quicker in this environment.
如果油价突然大幅回落,或者伊朗问题得到解决之类的。
And if you all sudden get a big reversal in oil prices, we get a resolution to Iran or whatever it is.
那突然之间,你又得谈论美联储的信誉问题了,因为他们现在不得不降息来抵消通胀压力的下降,而PCE数据已经告诉你,至少目前,关税和油价对经济的通胀传导非常有限。
Now all of a sudden you've got to talk about Fed credibility again because now they're having to cut rates to offset the drop inflationary pressures when PCM was already telling you that there was very little inflation pushing through the economy from tariffs and oil prices, at least at this point.
好的,那我们来谈谈这个,因为这是我之前想问你的一个问题,就是问你,在我们看来,通胀到底在做什么?
Okay, so let's let's talk about that because that's one of the questions I had here for you, which was just to ask you, what's inflation really doing in our view here?
你和我,你知道,今年这一年,我觉得除了伊朗战争之外,我们预期通缩会是今年的主题,特别是因为住房方面的情况。
You and I, you know, over the course of this year, I think we're Iran war aside, expecting disinflation to be the theme of this year, particularly because of what's going on with shelter.
但其他地方,比如通胀预期之类的,也一直都很低迷。
But but also elsewhere, you know, looking at inflation expectations and whatnot have been very muted.
当然,今年通胀确实是个问题,因为伊朗战争导致油价高涨。
Now, of course, inflation's been a concern this year because of the high oil prices that have resulted from the war in Iran.
我有点不太想用“暂时性”这个词,但跟你和其他持类似观点的人聊过之后,我的感觉是,如果这场战争能结束——希望今年晚些时候或明年初能结束——根据你看到的情况,你预期未来更可能是继续去通胀,而不是通胀加剧。
And I hesitate to use the word transitory, but from talking to you and others who think similar to you, I get the impression that, hey, if and when this war ends and let's let's hope it ends at some point this year or early next year, your expectation given the way the land of what you're seeing is that things would more likely continue to disinflate going forward than inflate.
是这样吗?
Is that correct?
因为,今天的就业报告就是一个很好的指标。
Because, again, the employment report was a good indicator of that today.
今年全年就业一直都很疲软。
So we've had very weak employment all year long.
所以,我们之前,你知道,我们在节目里聊过这个。
So we had this, you know, this and if you remember, we had this conversation here on the show.
当时就业报告出来,数字是16.9万。
And when the employment report came out it was like 169,000.
我当时就说,嘿,得小心那个数字,因为那会儿有很多返校的因素,大学生回学校,教授回去上班,老师也回去上班,等等。
I was like, hey, be careful with that number because this was a lot of back to school, people going back to college, professors going back to work, teachers going back to work, etcetera.
而且当然,你得把夏天离开的那些人都招回来,让学校有人手,诸如此类的事情。
And of course, you've got to hire all the people back from the summer to come back to man schools and those type of things.
所以对那个数字要小心一点。
So just be careful with that number.
当然,今天的数据也证实了那确实有点异常,尽管后来被下修了。
And of course, today's number kind of confirmed that that was a bit of an anomaly, even though it was revised down.
但整体来看,我们这一整年都有一连串非常疲弱的就业报告。
But we've had a whole string of very weak employment reports overall.
所以这说明了两个问题。
And so which suggests that two things.
第一,我们现在看到的是所谓的“劳动力囤积”。
One, what we're seeing is what we call labor hoarding.
上一次出现劳动力囤积,其实是在2009年之后,2010年、2011年那会儿。
And the last time that we saw labor hoarding was really in kind of post two thousand and nine, twenty ten, twenty eleven.
我们当时正从金融危机中走出来,公司既不愿意裁员,也不愿意招人。
And we were coming out of the financial crisis and companies weren't willing to fire people and they weren't willing to hire people.
他们想的是,我手上有员工。
They were like, I've got employees.
我会拼命留住他们,因为我手上有好员工。
I'm going hold on to them for dear life because I've got good employees.
好员工很难找,但我也不会再招其他人了。
And finding good employees are hard to come by, but I'm not gonna hire anybody else.
我们在离职率数据中也能看到这一点。
And we're seeing that in the jolt rate.
我们看辞职和裁员这些数据。
We look at quits and layoffs, those type of things.
基本上没人招人,也没人裁人。
There's basically nobody hiring, nobody firing.
所以就业数据之所以持续疲软,不是因为别的,就是因为公司目前只是在囤积现有的劳动力。
So we're not seeing these employment numbers remain weak because companies are just hoarding what labor they have at the moment.
这当然会随着时间的推移产生通缩效应。
And that's certainly disinflationary over time.
如果经济中不能增加更多就业,那就会拖累消费者,因为如果人们找不到工作,就没法消费。
If we don't start getting more employment into the economy, that's gonna weigh on consumers because if people aren't getting a job, they can't spend.
与此同时,我们这周看到了零售销售报告,整体零售销售数字大幅上升,环比增长了0.9%。
And at the same time, seeing and we saw the retail sales report this week, big retail sales numbers at the headline were up 0.9%.
这主要是汽油价格上涨推动的,并且正在传导到经济中。
That's primarily gasoline prices and that's feeding through into the economy.
这正在削弱人们继续购买其他商品、产品和服务的能力,因为他们的收入很大一部分被消耗掉了。
That's eroding people's ability to continue to consume on other goods, products and services because so much of their income is getting eaten up.
所以,进入明年,经济环境面临显著恶化的风险。
So there's certainly risk to a much weaker economic environment as we go into next year.
不过,这可能会被整个资本支出问题所抵消。
Now that could be potentially offset by this whole CapEx spending issue.
而且,当我们看ISM数据时,事实上我今天早上还发布了一张相关图表。
And we still when you take a look at ISM, in fact, I posted a graph of this this morning.
你看这个ISM指数,按经济权重算的话,基本上是80%服务业和20%制造业。
You take a look at the ISM equally weighted sorry, economically weighted index, which is basically 80% services and 20% manufacturing.
这个指数显示增长了很多。
That's showing a lot of increase.
不过这和消费者没什么关系。
Now that has nothing to do with consumers.
这只是对企业的调查。
This is just surveys of businesses.
你的生意怎么样?
How is your business?
我的生意好得很。
My business is doing great.
我们正在蓬勃发展。
We're booming.
我们什么都在买。
We're buying all kinds of stuff.
我们收到了各种各样的新订单。
We've all kinds of new orders coming in.
但这些新订单可能来自其他公司,它们是为了建设数据中心而购买产品。
But those new orders could be from other companies buying products for build outs of data centers.
所以这并不一定意味着个人消费方面表现良好。
So that doesn't necessarily mean the personal consumption side is doing well.
但我们刚刚在最新的GDP数据修正中看到,个人消费被上调了。
But we just saw in the latest revision to GDP data, personal consumption was ratchet up.
所以消费者还在坚持。
So the consumer is hanging in there.
他们正在动用储蓄。
They are drawn.
但有趣的是,个人消费之所以能维持,是因为他们在动用
But the interesting situation is that the way that the personal consumption is holding up is they're drawing on their
储蓄。
savings.
对,不是储蓄。
Yeah, not savings.
我们的储蓄率大概是3.8%,不管具体多少,反正挺低的。
Our savings rate is like 3.8%, whatever it is, it's pretty low.
对,我就是这个意思。
Yeah, that's what I'm saying.
他们不是存钱,而是在花钱。
Rather than saving, they're spending.
对,他们在花钱,但他们也在动用401k计划和投资账户里的钱,这些资产特别是过去五年积累起来的。
Yeah, they're spending, but they're drawing into four zero one ks plans and investment accounts and all these assets that have built up over the last five years in particular.
现在他们开始动用这些钱来满足消费需求。
They're now starting to draw into those to meet their spending requirements.
所以,我们说的其实是一回事。
And so just to be clear, we're saying the same thing.
抱歉。
I'm sorry.
我误会你的意思了。
I misunderstood you.
不不不不。
No, no, no, no.
没关系。
That's okay.
好的。
Okay.
那么。
So.
好吧。
All right.
简单来说,我描述的是你认为可能发生的情况,对吧?也就是说,除非油价继续上涨或者有人大量买入石油,除非油价持续高位更长时间,否则你认为趋势更倾向于通胀放缓,对吗?
So in a nutshell, though, I described correctly what you think is likely to happen here, which is barring oil prices going higher or buying oil, barring oil prices remaining high for a lot longer, you think that the trend is really towards more towards disinflation?
我很好奇。
And I'm curious.
你觉得美联储下次行动时,利率是会再次加息还是降息?
What do you think the next act of the Fed when it does act next with the interest rate is likely to be another hike or a cut?
嗯,问题是要维持稳定很长时间,但当他们真正采取行动时,你觉得会是哪个方向?
Well, thing is hold steady for a long time, but when they actually take action, which which direction do you think I think it's likely to be?
所以下次会议是10月27日,我想大概就是那个时候。
So the next meeting is October 27, I think, right around there.
然后之后的那次会议会在12月。
And then the one after that will be in December.
我觉得如果他们维持利率不变,我也不会感到意外,
I think that it won't surprise me if they hold rates at
下次
the next
会议,因为他们刚刚加息了。
meeting simply because they did hike.
现在他们要看看这如何反映到经济中。
And now they're going to kind of see how that reflects through through the economy.
如果油价在下跌,他们很可能会按兵不动。
If oil prices are dropping, they're probably going to hold.
然后我们再看情况。
And we'll see what happens.
但就像我说的,美联储对油价其实没什么影响。
But as I said, the Fed doesn't really have any impact on on oil prices.
他们可以把利率加到天上去。
They can hike rates to the moon.
油价还是那样。
It's like Oil prices.
但有一点我想说清楚,就是咱们在聊通胀的时候。
But one thing I do want to make clear when you and I are talking about inflation.
我说的是价格的变化速度。
That I'm talking about the rate of change in prices.
我知道很多人会说,你去商店看看,这个多少钱,那个多少钱,情况就是这样。
And I know there's a lot of people like, well, if you go to the store, this is what this cost and this is what that cost and this is what's going on.
而且通货膨胀很严重,简直失控了。
And inflation is terrible and it's just out of hand.
这倒是真的。
And that's true.
你看,自从2020年我们向经济注入资金并关闭一切以来,物价上涨了大约29%,这推高了物价,然后当然,我们还在上面加征了关税,再加上高油价,这些都让物价居高不下。
And look, prices are up like 29% since 2020 when we sent money into the economy and shut down everything that lifted prices up, which and then, of course, we slapped tariffs on top of that and you have high oil prices, which all kept prices elevated.
但这不是我说的通货膨胀。
But that's not the inflation I'm talking about.
是的,消费者层面的物价确实很高,而且自2020年以来确实大幅上涨。
Yes, prices for the consumer side are definitely high and they are definitely have increased dramatically since 2020.
这一点没有争议。
No argument with that.
我们说的是,我和亚当具体在讨论的是物价的变化率。
What we're talking about is what Adam and I are talking about specifically is the rate of change in prices.
所以如果今天油价是每桶100美元,一年后还是每桶100美元,那通货膨胀就是零。
So if oil prices are at $100 a barrel today and they're $100 a barrel a year from now, inflation is zero.
我们说的就是这个。
That's all we're talking about.
市场关心的也就是这个。
And that's all the market cares about.
再说一次,当我说通胀的时候,我不是在说你个人的生活,你花了多少钱,你的房子值多少钱,你的车怎么样,这些我都不在说。
The market and again, so when I'm talking about inflation, I'm not talking about your personal life, what you're spending, what your house costs, what your car, I'm not talking about any of that.
我说的是市场关心什么。
What I'm talking about is what does the market care about?
而市场关心的是价格随时间的变化率,以及这对经济意味着什么。
And what the market cares about is the rate of change in prices over time and what does that mean for the economy.
当你开始看就业数据,开始看消费情况,开始看储蓄情况的时候,所有这些数据都表明,
And looking at that data when you start looking at employment, start looking at what's happening with spending, you start looking at what's happening with savings.
如果油价下跌,未来十二个月的通胀率会更低,而不是更高。
All of that suggests that if oil prices come down and the rate of inflation is going to be lower over the next twelve months rather than higher.
好的,太好了。
Okay, great.
所以这就是为什么我特意用了“通胀放缓”这个词,它不是说价格在下降。
And that's why I was taking care to use the word disinflation, which doesn't mean prices are coming down.
只是说价格涨得越来越慢。
It just means they are rising at a slower and slower pace.
没错。
That's correct.
好,那要聊的话题太多了。
Okay, so so much to talk about.
时间却这么少。
So little time.
当然,过去几个月的热点,跟通胀有关,或者说至少跟人们对通胀的看法有关,就是收益率走高。
So, of course, the story of the past couple of months, ties into inflation or at least people's perception of inflation, has been higher yields.
我们看到债券收益率一直在涨,而且还在继续涨。
So we've had higher bond yields that continue going higher.
我要替你说几句话了。
I'm going put some words in your mouth.
你可以随便反驳我。
Feel free to take them out.
但我想,Lance,你可能有点意外,十年期收益率这么快就涨到这么高。
But I can imagine, Lance, you're a little surprised that the ten year got as high as it did as quickly as it did.
我知道你们RIA的人一直认为债券价格会回升,收益率会下降。
I know you guys at RIA believe that bond prices, bond yields will come down.
我觉得这并没有真正改变你们的看法,但如果我猜错了,你告诉我。
I don't think anything has really changed your opinion on that, although if that's true, let me know.
不过,就我前面说的,你并不是唯一这么想的人。但现在这周我们突破了5.3%,这些收益率是不是比你最初预期的涨得更快更高?
But but but just to my claim there, it's not like you're alone on this, but I mean, now the fact that we hit 5.3 this week, have these yields gone higher faster than you initially thought they would?
不,其实没有。
No, not really.
因为,再说一次,有好几个因素在起作用。
Because, again, you've had several factors.
那么,收益率是怎么定价的呢?
So how do yields get priced?
所以这才是真正的问题。
So this is the real question.
其实我现在正在写一篇关于这个的文章,可能接下来一两周内会发出来。
In fact, I'm working on a article on this right now, which I'll probably post in the next week or two.
让我看看能不能马上给你找到这张图表。
Let me see if I can find this chart real fast for you.
在你找的时候,我稍微改一下我的问题。
And as you're looking for it, let me let me just amend my question to you slightly.
前几天我在X上发了一条。
So I put up on X the other day.
当十年期收益率达到5.3%的时候,我说,你知道吗,如果我在2026年初,1月1日,当时利率是,我记不清了,好像是4.2%左右。
When the tenure hit 5.3 and I said, you know what, if I told you at the beginning of twenty twenty six, January 1, when rates were, I can't remember, like the tenure, I think it was like 4.2.
如果我说,嘿,到9月底,十年期收益率会到5.3%。
If I said, hey, by the end of September, the tenure is going to be at 5.3%.
你会预料到在这种情况下股市会创历史新高吗?
Would you have expected that the stock market would be at all time highs under that scenario?
我觉得大多数人会说,哇,如果收益率涨得那么快,那不行,市场肯定会受罪的。
I think most people would have said, woah, if yields raise that high that quickly, no, the market's going be suffering.
总会有地方开始出问题。
Things are going to start breaking somewhere.
而且市场确实在受罪,也确实有东西在出问题。
And the market is suffering and things are breaking.
好吧。
All right.
那我们就来聊聊这个吧,因为你知道,如果你看看那些指数,它们还是接近历史高点的,到底是哪些指数呢?
Well, let's get into that then, because, you know, if you if you look and if you look at the indices, they're still near all time highs, which which indices.
嗯,标普500挺接近的。
Well, the S and P was pretty close.
我上次看的时候,
Last time I looked at it,
确实是的。
it is.
纳斯达克今天创了历史新高。
NASDAQ is at an all time high today.
标普500也正好在历史高点。
S and P is right at all time highs.
好,那你正好帮我说了我想说的。
Okay, so you're making my point for me.
我刚才
Now, I was
等等,
like, hold on.
我只是
I just
想快速跟你说一下。
want to say real quick for you.
顺便告诉你,你的搭档莱博维茨上周就这个问题讲得很好。
Just so you have this information, your partner, Leibowitz, did a great job last week of addressing this point.
他有一张很棒的图表,展示了标普500里不同板块的表现,结果一点也不意外。
He had a great chart where he put up where it was the performance of the different sectors in the S and P and no huge surprise.
但就是科技板块在撑起整个大局。
But it's tech is carrying the whole show.
如果你看看其他板块,它们的跌幅相当大。
And if you look at other sectors, they're down pretty substantially.
所以这很好地说明了正在发生的恶化情况。
So it was a good indication of showing the deterioration that's going on.
但是,你知道,这个行业是
But, you know, the industry is
一个重要的
an important
信号指标。
signaling metric.
而且正如你所说,现在可能正在发出虚假的安全信号,或者说虚假的繁荣信号。
And to your point, maybe sending a false signal of security right now or a false signal of prosperity.
对,这正是我的意思。
Yeah, that's exactly my point.
所以这基本上就是标普指数,对吧。
So this is just basically so this is the S and P right here, right.
现在正处在历史最高点。
Sitting right here at all time highs.
纳斯达克今天实际上也创了历史新高。
The NASDAQ actually is setting all time highs today.
但这很好。
But this is great.
所以这是市值加权指数。
So this is the market cap weighted index.
好,这就是那10家最大的公司,微软、谷歌、亚马逊等等。
Okay, so this is where the 10 largest companies, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, etcetera.
所有的盈利都集中在那里。
That's where all the earnings is.
所以你说到利率上升。
And so you talk about higher rates.
这些公司都在2020年利率处于十年期国债收益率0.5%的时候进行了债务再融资。
All these companies refinance their debt back in 2020 when interest rates were at half a percent on the ten year treasury.
现在它们的利息覆盖率接近历史最高水平。
Their interest cost coverage is near record levels right now.
所以利率上升对这些公司根本没有影响。
So higher interest rates aren't impacting these companies at all.
这不会影响盈利,因为它们的偿债成本仍然非常非常低。
It's not impacting earnings because their debt servicing cost is still very, very low.
它们相对较低。
They're relatively low.
所以
So
一旦你走出这个范围,这就是等权重指数。
once you step out of this, so this is the equal weighted index.
这是RSP。
This is RSP.
这个指数剔除了那十大股票的权重。
So this strips out the weighting of those large 10 stocks.
你可以看到,就在利率开始飙升的时候,RSP发生了什么。
And you can see right where interest rates started to spike, what happened to RSP.
还记得今年早些时候,大家都在说,哦,你想离开科技股。
And remember, earlier this year, everybody was raving is like, oh, you want to be out of tech.
你想投资RSP,因为等权重指数跑赢了标普500。
You want to be an RSP because the equal weight index is outperforming the S and P.
所以那时候所有资金都涌向那里,但突然之间,这个交易就不那么顺利了。
And so that's where all the money was piling into all of a sudden that trade hasn't been working out so well.
现在重要的是,等权重指数已经极度超卖。
Now importantly, equal weight is extremely oversold.
我们稍后讨论技术面的时候会详细讲这个。
And we'll get into this when we get to talk about technical stuff here in a few minutes.
这是小盘股。
Here's small caps.
这是标普500,它们对利率最敏感。
So this is S and P 500, which are the most interest rate sensitive.
小盘公司,首先,40%是不盈利的,但它们没有太多额外收益和现金流来抵消更高的利率。
Small cap companies, first of all, 40% of them are non profitable, but they don't have a lot of excess earnings and cash flow to offset higher rates.
我的意思是,这直接影响到它们的利润。
I mean, that goes right to their bottom line.
这些股票正在因更高的利率而被重新定价。
Those stocks are getting repriced for higher rates.
这是中盘股。
Here's mid cap stocks.
这是标普400。
This is the S and P 400.
同样的图表。
Same chart.
今天它们都在反弹。
They're all getting a bounce today.
这是我们之前提到的国际市场。
Here's international we're talking about earlier.
情况一样。
Same story.
你的意思是除了那些超大规模科技公司,其他所有公司都感受到了压力,对吧?
You're saying everybody but the hyperscalers is feeling Yeah.
所以再说一次,这就是迈克给你看的。
So here's again, this is what Mike was showing you.
这是iShares科技指数,创了历史新高。
So here's the iShares Technology Index all time high.
我们来谈谈日用消费品。
Let's talk about Staples.
日用消费品反映了消费者的状况,能告诉你很多正在发生的事情。
So Staples is the consumer tells you a lot about what's going on.
接下来是房地产,很明显,我们在讨论房市,那里发生了什么。
Here's real estate, obviously, talking about the housing market, what's going on there.
公用事业指数,当然涉及能源价格等等,在经济中,被压得很惨。
Utilities index, that's of course energy pricing, etcetera, within the economy, getting absolutely crushed.
事实上,我们上周刚买了一些公用事业股票,因为这一块真的跌得太厉害了。
In fact, we just started buying some more utility stocks last week because again, this has just gotten so beat up here.
市场内部会出现轮动。
You're going to get a rotation within the markets.
这就是为什么我们的因子轮动模型从成长股转回价值股,因为市场这种分化,这种情况会逆转。
And this is why our factor rotation model has switched from growth back to value because of this dispersion in the market, this is going to reverse.
你可能会开始看到,这并不意味着科技股必须下跌。
And you're going to start to see potentially, that doesn't mean technology has to go down.
只是意味着市场的其他板块可能开始表现得比高成长板块更好。
It just means that other sectors of the market may start performing better than the high growth kind of sector of the market.
不过今天这种情况还没发生。
Now that's not happening today.
今天英伟达涨得很猛,AMD、亚马逊、特斯拉也都在涨,就是这类股票。
Nvidia is booming today, AMD is up, Amazon is up, Tesla is up, those types of things.
但我们开始看到,而且你从这张公用事业图表里也能看到,最近几天有一些资金开始流入这个板块。
But we are starting to see, and you can see in this chart of utilities, you are starting to see over the last few days some buying coming into this sector.
这可能是早期信号,我们即将触发买入信号,你可能会看到资金回流到市场的其他领域,从而缩小目前这种分化。
And that may be kind of an early indication and we're about to trigger a buy signal that you may start to see some money flows back into these other areas of the markets to reduce this dispersion we've got going on right now.
好的。
Okay.
那么……
So...
但更重要的是,利率正在影响市场。
But the bigger point is that interest rates are impacting the markets.
如果你看标普指数,你根本看不出来。
If you're looking at the S and P, you just don't see it.
是的。
Yes.
你知道,很多人就是看那些主要指数来判断市场走势的。
Which, you know, again, lot of the world just looks to those major indices to see how things are going.
这其实会给人一种假象,让人觉得市场比实际要好,就像你刚才给我们揭示的那样。
It sends sort of a false signal that things are better than they than they are, as you've just revealed for us here.
但我很好奇,这可能是两种情况——基本上你是在预期市场要出现轮动,我理解的是资金会从科技板块流向那些之前被打击的领域。我知道你也不能百分百确定,但你是不是……
But I'm curious, it could either be so you're basically expecting a rotation coming up here is what I'm taking from capital is going to go from marginal capital is going to go from tech into these other areas that have been beaten up and so I know you don't know with certainty, but are you...
你现在的默认预期是那些被低估的板块会开始复苏吗?
Is your default right now expecting that these beaten down sectors are gonna start recovering?
还是说,更可能是市场顶部开始走弱?
Or is it more that the top is gonna start weakening?
也就是说,接下来的整体趋势是向下还是向上?
Like is the is the net trajectory gonna be downwards or upwards coming out of this?
不,我觉得整体趋势是向上的。
No, I think it's upwards is the net trajectory.
所以这周末的牛熊报告会讨论第四季度的展望。
So this weekend's bull bear report is talking about the outlook for Q4.
所以我们回到这里来看。
So we've had let's go back to here.
让我回到我们的标普500图表。
Let me go back to our S and P chart.
我很高兴问了那个问题,因为你刚才在帮我说明,由于科技股撑住了指数,情况看起来比实际要好。
And I'm glad to ask that question because you were you were sort of helping me say that things look rosier than they are than they have been because of the tech keeping the indices up.
有人可能会解读为,既然现在太好了,那接下来就会向下调整。
Someone interpret that as a oh, well, then if things are too good now, then they're going to adjust downwards.
但看起来你并不是这么预期的。
But but it doesn't seem like that's what you're expecting.
不,不,完全不是。
No, no, not at all.
那我们就先回到技术分析的部分。
So so let's let's just go back into our technical work for a moment.
这是标普500。
So this is the S and P.
从八月开始,我们真的哪儿都没去。
We've gone absolutely nowhere for the last really since August.
市场……
The mark...
八月、九月,你知道的,市场就是横盘了两个月。
August, September, and, you know, the market just went sideways for two months.
把这里的这四天去掉。
Strip out this four days that you had right here.
对,然后它就一直平着。
Right and then it went flat forever.
是的,市场从五月起就没动过。
Yeah, the market has gone nowhere since May.
所以,纠正市场高估有两种方式。
So there's two ways to correct overvaluation in the markets.
要么回调,要么盘整,而我们显然正在经历标普的盘整。
Either you have a correction or you have a consolidation and we're definitely going through a consolidation on the S and P.
再说,你看其他那些板块,小盘股、中盘股、国际市场、新兴市场、公用事业、房地产,这些都被打压得很惨。
Again, you look at those other sectors, small caps, mid caps, international, emerging markets, utilities, real estate, those have been beaten to death.
所以它们现在都严重超卖了。
So they're extremely oversold at this point.
那现在我们说的是第四季度。
So now we're talking about quarter four.
接下来一周我们就要开始看财报季了。
We're about to start earnings in the next week.
所以很快就会有各种财报公布出来。
So we're going to start having earnings announcements come back.
股票回购也快要恢复了。
Stock buybacks are about to come back.
过去一个月它们一直处于静默期。
They've been in blackout for the last month.
所以我们现在就要迎来所有公司的回购潮了。
So we're about to get all the corporate buy now.
公司回购股票本身并不会拖累市场,只是他们暂时不买了而已。
Just because corporations are in buyback, that's not a drag on the markets because it's just they're not buying.
但现在他们即将成为市场的推动力。
But now they're about to be an additive to the markets.
你还记得我们2022年的那次对话吧。
Now you'll remember our conversation back in 2022.
我们经历了一次回调。
We've gone through a correction.
我们当时写了文章,说现在是买入市场的时候了,因为你在为年底的季节性强劲行情做准备。
We wrote the articles like now it's time to buy the market because you're setting up for that seasonally strong end of the year.
年底前有几个利好因素在向你靠近。
You've got a few things tailwind wise coming towards the end of the year.
如果中期选举出现僵局,那会是好事。
If we get gridlock in the midterm elections, that's gonna be good.
那对市场来说会是利好的,而这很可能是最可能的结果。
That's gonna be bullish for the markets, which is probably the most likely outcome.
众议院的民主党人拿下了众议院,共和党人控制了另一个。
House Democrats take the center to the house and Republicans control the other one.
所以就会出现僵局,什么政策都推不动。
So you get gridlock, no policy gets done.
华尔街就喜欢这样。
Wall Street loves that.
这会给市场带来提振。
That gives you a boost to the markets.
回购在提振市场。
You've got buybacks boosting the markets.
盈利又会非常强劲,这也会提振市场,而且市场里流动性很充足。
Earnings are gonna be very strong again, that's gonna boost the markets and you have a lot of liquidity in the markets.
所以有一大堆基本面因素在支撑,很可能接下来市场到年底会往上走。
So you've got a whole bunch of fundamental factors that are really setting up that probably the next move in the markets is going to be a move higher through year end.
而且就像你说的,标普可能确实会表现得不那么好。
And to your point, it could be that the S and P actually kind of underperforms.
它会涨,但涨幅不如小盘股、中盘股,以及市场上其他一些被严重打压的子板块,因为资金会去寻找这些机会,它们有可能比大盘指数本身涨得快得多。
It goes up, but it goes up less than small caps, mid caps, some of these other sub sectors of the markets that have been really beaten down as capital goes to look for that, there's a potential for those to move much faster than the broad market index itself.
好的。
Okay.
行。
All right.
这正是我想听的那种关于你展望的细节。
That's exactly the kind of detail of your outlook that I was looking for.
所以
So
这就是这周末的新闻,我正在梳理这些。
and that's this weekend's news that I'm going through all that.
好的。
Okay.
如果我理解错了,请纠正我。
And correct me if I'm wrong.
我可能记错了。
I might be wrong.
我可能把财务顾问搞混了,但几周前你是不是稍微降低了一点风险?
I might be confusing financial advisors, but were you slightly derisking a little bit a few weeks ago and
我们在七月份确实降低了风险。
did we derisk back in July.
七月。
July.
好的,那你现在是不是还有一些闲置资金,正考虑投到你认为可能复苏的其他板块?
Okay, so are you do you still have some of that capital dry that you're now thinking of deploying into what you think could be a a recovery in these other sectors?
没有。
No.
我们已经……
We've...
我现在在我们的模型里是持币观望的。
I'm I'm holding right now in our model.
我们现在只有大约13%的现金。
We're only about 13% cash.
所以我们要做两件事。
And so we're gonna do two things.
我们快到年底了。
So we're coming into year end.
所以有几件事我们打算做。
So we've got a couple of things that we're going to do.
首先,收益率达到5%,这简直是天上掉馅饼。
First of all, with yields at 5%, this is a gift.
我们想抓住这个机会,因为这种收益率不会持续太久。
And we want to take advantage of that gift because you're not going to keep that for very long.
太好了。
Great.
这正是我接下来想聊的话题。
And this is the next topic I want to talk about.
太好了。
So great.
很高兴你提到了这一点。
I'm glad you're flagging So
我们要重新调整债券模型。
we're gonna rebalance our bond model.
所以我会在长期债券上承担一些损失。
So I'm gonna take some losses and some of our longer duration bonds.
我会做一些税务亏损卖出,然后基本上增加长期债券的权重,但用……我投资组合里有一个很长的三十年期限的部分,大约占5%。
I'm gonna do some tax loss selling and then basically increase the weight and long duration but use a so I have a really long thirty year duration piece in the portfolio it's about 5%.
我会在那部分上承担损失,然后增加久期。
I'm gonna take the loss in that and then increase duration.
哦,抱歉,是增加长期债券的权重,同时把久期缩短一点到二十年。
Oh sorry, increase the weighting of longer duration by shortening the duration a bit to twenty years.
所以我可能会从5%的三十年期限,增加到7%到8%的二十年期限。
So I'm probably gonna go from five percent thirty years to seven to eight percent twenty year duration.
然后我们会加一些五年期的债券,目前我们大部分债券的期限都在三到七年之间。
And then we're gonna add in some five year duration, which right now we have most of our durations between three and seven years.
所以我们会稍微增加五年期债券的配置,因为现在五年期债券的收益率是5%。
So we're gonna add a little bit to five year duration because five year bonds are paying 5% right now.
这样我可以提高五年期部分的权重,从而提升整个投资组合的收益率,然后我们也会重新平衡组合中很多短期债券。
So I can increase that weight in the five year bucket and bring up the overall yield of the portfolio then we'll rebalance a lot of the shorter stuff in the portfolio as well.
所以我们会调整一下投资组合的收益部分。
So we'll kind of rejigger the income side of the portfolio.
然后在股票方面,我们会做几笔亏损卖出,然后重新平衡。
And then on the equity side, we're going to do a couple of tax loss sales and then rebalance.
再次强调,就像我们之前讨论过的,我们已经减少了因子轮动模型的配置。
So again, like we talked about previously, we've reduced in our factor rotation model.
谢谢。
Thank you.
我忘了把图表拿下来。
I forgot to take the chart down.
在因子轮动模型中,我们减少了成长股,增加了价值股。
In the factor rotation model, we reduced the growth side and increased the value side.
所以我们要把同样的价值轮动应用到实际的60/40配置模型中。
So we're going to apply that same value rotation into the actual kind of sixtyforty allocation model.
我们会增加一些价值股,同时在这个投资组合中锁定部分利润。
We'll increase some of the value stocks and that portfolio takes some profits.
我们很多科技股最近表现很好,就把它们调回目标权重。
A lot of our tech stocks have done really well lately, just kind of reduce those back to target weight.
好的。
Okay.
行。
All right.
很好。
Great.
我们下周就执行这个操作。
And we'll do that next week.
所以我们下周五有很多要聊的。
So we'll have a lot to talk about next Friday.
好的,太好了。
Okay, great.
我想说的是,各位观众,我们会继续每周在这个视频里,请Lance分享他公司的交易操作。
And I was just going to say, folks, we will continue, including in this video on a weekly basis, to ask Lance to share what trades his firm is making.
所以他们会实时做出这些调整。
So that is is they're making those changes in real time.
你们会持续得到最新消息。
You'll you'll be kept updated.
好的。
Alright.
那我们就进入正题吧。
So let's let's get to that that point.
Lance,你刚才提到了那一点,我之后就得收尾了。
You you mentioned there, Lance, and I gotta wrap things up after that.
所以这是我过去一周在这个频道上一直在聊的话题,就是。
So this has been something I've been talking about a lot over the past week on this channel, which is.
好的,今年债券收益率已经涨了很多,你知道,它们更有可能从这里继续上涨,还是可能见顶然后开始回落?
Okay, bond yields have have risen a lot this year, you know, are they more likely to continue up from here or are they likely to peak out and start coming down?
但从绝对值和实际值来看,现在,你知道,你得到的,债券现在看起来比很多股票更有吸引力,因为它们提供了更丰厚的收益率,更丰厚的实际收益率。
But on an absolute basis and on a real basis right now, you know, you're getting, you know, bonds are looking a lot more relatively attractive right now than a lot of equities because they're giving you richer yields, richer real yields.
而且你可以持有它们,风险比股票小得多。
And you can sit in them with a lot less risk than you can in equities.
所以,我想我可能跟你聊过这个,但我知道我跟迈克尔聊过,就是,你会不会开始看到信贷市场的资金从股票市场撤出,因为你可以锁定这些收益率并获得不错的回报。
And so and I think I might have talked with you about this, but I know I talked with Michael about it is, you know, are you going to start seeing a pull from the credit markets of capital from the equity market because you can start locking in these yields and get paid well.
所以我想我们就从这里开始吧。
And so I guess let's start there.
我还有几个后续问题。
I have a few follow on questions.
但你说这是一份礼物,这让我觉得你认为这些不会持续太久。
But you said it's a gift, which leads me to believe that you don't think these are going to last for all that long.
所以你得趁现在还能拿到的时候,赶紧锁定这些更高的实际收益率。
So you want to try to lock in these higher real yields while you can get them.
然后如果你判断对了,接下来一两年债券收益率开始下降,那你不仅拿到了更高的实际收益率,还能享受到债券价格本身带来的资本增值。
And then if you're correct in that bond yields start coming down over the next year or two, not only are you getting those higher real yields, but you're also getting the underlying capital appreciation of the bond prices themselves.
没错。
That's right.
所以,我明白了。
And so so I've got it.
就像我说的,我现在正在写一篇文章。
Like I said, I'm writing an article right now.
我觉得人们在看市场的时候,最容易犯两个错误。
I think there's two things that people really make a mistake on when looking at the markets.
而且,现在有很多人对债券市场特别悲观。
And again, there's so many people out there doom and gloom on the bond market.
觉得一切都要完蛋了,什么都会违约。
It's all going to hell in a handbasket and everything's going to default.
我们都会死的。
We're all going to die.
但再说一次,从投资者的角度来看,市场会给你机会,而且从历史上看,你得看看债券长期的表现,还得明白为什么要在投资组合里持有债券。
But again, from an investor standpoint, the market gives you opportunities and historically you have to look at how bonds perform over time and you have to understand why do you own bonds in a portfolio.
这个我们之前聊过。
And we've talked about this before.
但如果我想在投资组合里创造回报率,为什么不想持有债券呢?
But if I'm trying to create a rate of return in a portfolio, why would I not want to own bonds?
来,我给你看个图表。
Here, let me show you a graphic.
这就是那个图表。
So this is a graphic.
这是我正在写的文章的一个预览,解释为什么你应该用不同的眼光看待债券。
This is a preview of the article I'm writing right now explaining why you should look at bonds differently.
再说一次,我们现在看债券,一切都只看价格。
Again, we look at bonds today and we just base everything on price.
就像,哦,你会把债券抛掉。
It's like, oh, you'll drop bonds down.
债券很糟糕。
Bonds are terrible.
别碰债券。
Be out of bonds.
亚当,你买房子,大概一个半月前签的合同吧?
Adam, you bought your house, what, about a month and a half ago now when you signed your contract?
是的。
Yes.
严格来说,我签了合同。
Technically, I signed the contract.
实际上要到明年夏天他们交房,我才真正买下房子。
I don't actually buy the house until they deliver it by next summer.
但没错。
But yes.
但你已经谈好了价格。
But you've agreed on a price.
我们已经谈好了价格。
We've agreed on a price.
好的。
Okay.
你那个价格,现在买你的房子已经亏了,因为自从你锁定那个价格以来,利率已经上涨了。
That price of you have now overpaid for your house because interest rates have gone up since you locked in that price.
所以你的房子现在的价值比你买的那天要低。
So the value of your house is now less today than it was the day that you bought it.
所以你已经在这房子上亏钱了。
So you're already losing money on your house.
我跟你说过这肯定会发生,因为我是最厉害的。
I told you this exactly was going to happen because I was the greatest.
所以
So
市场对此的看法是,亚当,你应该卖掉你的房子,因为你在亏钱。
the market's view of this is, Adam, you should sell your house because you're losing money on it.
但你既把房子看作金融资产,也把它看作居住的地方。
But you look at your house as a financial asset and also a place you're going to live.
你不会很快卖掉那套房子的。
You're not gonna sell that house anytime soon.
你会持有那套房子十年、二十年。
You're gonna hold that house for ten years, twenty years.
普通人平均持有房子七年,对吧。
Average person holds a house for seven years right.
但你可能会住得更久。
So but you may live there longer.
所以我的观点是,这全是心理作用,对吧?
So my point about that is it's all psychology right?
我们忘了当初买债券的原因,那就是为了保本和收益,到期按面值兑付。
We forget about the reason that we buy bonds to start with, which is I buy a bond for capital preservation and income and matures at face value.
如果我今天以5%的收益率买入债券,我会得到5%,而且我能精确到每一分钱地计算出债券到期时我的回报是多少。
If I buy a bond at a 5% yield today, I'm gonna get 5% and I can calculate to the actual penny of what my return will be when that bond matures.
如果利率升到10%,我的债券价值会随着利率上升而下跌,因为这只是调整——如果我想今天卖出债券,价格需要是多少才能让两只不同债券的收益率相等?
If interest rates go to 10%, the value of my bond is gonna fall as interest rates go up because all it's doing is adjusting if I wanted to sell my bond today, what does the price have to be to make yields equivalent between two different bonds?
每天发生的也就是这些。
That's all that happens on a day to day basis.
你亏钱了吗?
Are you losing money?
没有,这只是今天的价值。
No, this is just the value today.
仅此而已。
That's all it is.
你的国债并没有亏任何钱。
You haven't lost any money in your treasury bond.
只是价值在上下波动而已。
It's just the value moving up and down.
现在,如果我想创造回报率,这就回到这张图表了。
Now, if I'm trying to create a rate of return, so this goes back to this chart right here.
当美联储压低收益率的时候,那是在2020年,以及2020年之前,回到2009年,当时美联储在压制利率,这就是所谓的TINA市场。
When yields were being held down by the Federal Reserve and this is back in 2020 and previous to 2020 going back to 2009 when the Fed was suppressing interest rates, this was the Tina market.
没有其他选择。
There is no alternative.
我不能投资债券,也不能持有现金,因为货币市场利率是零。
I couldn't be in bonds, I couldn't be in cash because money markets paid zero interest.
我只能买股票。
I had to be in stocks.
所以我必须靠股票的表现来让我的钱随时间增长。
So I had to have stock performance to create my money to grow over time.
而利息收入非常非常低。
And interest income was very, very low.
在那段时期,利息收入只占我回报的29%。
Interest income only covered 29% of my return during that period.
现在,同样的收入,同样的债券持仓比例,能覆盖我58%的收入需求。
Today, that same income, that same portion of bond holdings covers 58% of my income needs.
所以如果我想构建一个6%回报率的投资组合,光靠持有债券就能覆盖超过一半。
So if I'm trying to build a portfolio of a 6% return, I can cover more than half of that just by owning bonds.
剩下的部分来自股票的股息收益,现在我可以很容易地构建一个大约2%股息率的投资组合,稍微花点功夫可能达到3%。
The rest of it comes from the dividend yields on stocks, which right now I can build a portfolio of about a 2% dividend yield very easily, maybe 3% if I do a little bit of work.
然后我就不需要它们了。
And then I don't need them.
我不必承担大量的股票风险。
I don't have to take on a lot of equity risk.
如果市场下跌10%,我不必为了达到回报目标而承受10%的损失。
If the market goes down by 10%, I don't have to suffer a 10% decline to try to meet my return goals.
我可以把50%的钱放在股票上,市场下跌10%。
I can have 50% of my money in equities, the market falls 10%.
这里给你算笔账。
And here's the math for you.
我有一半的钱在股票里,市场跌了10%,我的投资组合会跌5%。
I have 50% of my money in equities and the market falls 10%, I'm gonna be down 5% of my portfolio.
好,但我股票能拿到2%的股息。
Okay, but I get a 2% yield for my equity.
所以那只有1%,因为只有一半在股票里,我拿到1%。
So that's a 1% since only half is in equities, I get 1% on that.
所以现在跌了4%。
So now I'm down 4%.
我投资组合的另一半能产生5%的回报。
I have another half of my portfolio generating 5% returns.
那又是2.5%。
That's another two and a half.
我现在跌了。
I'm now down.
市场跌了10。
The market's down 10.
我的投资组合下跌了2.5%。
My portfolio is down two and a half.
在市场低迷时,我能承受这个跌幅。
I can survive that in a market downturn.
这就是我们常常忽略的债券和投资组合的价值。
And that's what we forget about the value of bonds and portfolios.
我们太纠结于每天的股价波动,以至于忘了我们持有债券的真正原因。
We get so tied up in the day to day price fluctuations that we forget the real reasons that we own bonds.
这里有一个重要的图表给你看。
Here's an important graphic for you.
让我停止共享屏幕。
Let me stop this share.
我得马上切换一下窗口。
I have to change windows here real quick.
现在我们聊到最近我们经常讨论的一个话题,就是由于AI股票等这些因素,市场估值的问题。
So now we're talking so one of your common topics as of late that you and I've talked about is about valuations on the markets because of the AI stocks and all these type of things.
这说得很有道理。
And that's a great point.
估值确实偏高。
Valuations are elevated.
我们知道,从长远来看,如果估值非常高,未来十年股票的回报率大概会在零到正百分之二和负百分之二之间。
We know that on a go forward basis that with valuations very high, that returns on stocks over the next ten years are probably going to be somewhere between zero, say positive two and negative 2% somewhere in there.
这就是估值告诉我们的。
That's what valuations tell us.
我现在可以买5%收益率的国债,而股票的收益率只有2%。
I can buy treasury bonds today at 5% versus a 2% yield in equities.
那为什么我不在接下来的十年里这么做呢?
Why wouldn't I do that on the next ten year basis?
为什么我现在不买十年期国债,锁定5%的收益,而股票的未来回报预期只有2%甚至更低?
Why would I not buy a ten year bond today, I can lock in 5% where my forward return expectations on stocks are 2% or less?
我们都在谈论估值,谈论泡沫,但从来没有把这些联系到投资组合管理上,联系到我想要达到的目标上,因为我们太关注债券当前的价格,而这和实际情况完全无关。
So we all talk about valuations, we all talk about bubbles, but we don't ever relate that back to what that means to portfolio management and what I'm trying to do because we're so focused on the price of the bond today, which has absolutely nothing to do with the reality.
这只是债券相对于当前利率的重新估值。
It's just the revaluation of the bond relative to today's interest rates.
只要我不在市场上一惊一乍地抛售,我的国债就没有亏损。
I haven't lost any money in my Treasury bond as long as I don't knee jerk sell it in the market.
所以我采访了斯蒂芬·巴伐利亚,他创建了“收入工厂”框架,这主要是为收入型投资者设计的。
And so I interviewed Stephen Bavaria, who has created the Income Factory framework, which is basically for income investors.
他在里面有一大堆不同的信贷和类似信贷的产品。
And he has a whole bunch of different credit and credit like products he has in there.
他基本上说,你可以。
And he basically says, you can.
你可以建立一个非常有吸引力的投资组合,产生大量收入。
You can build a really attractive portfolio that generates a lot of income.
是的,你得愿意不去每天纠结于投资组合的市场价值,因为它可能会波动。
And, yeah, you got to be you got to be willing to not obsess about the market value of your portfolio on a day to day basis because it can fluctuate.
尤其是当收益率上升的时候。
And especially when when yields are rising.
对,你会看到价格下跌,但你持有它并不是为了它的市值。
Yeah, you're going to you're going to see prices depressed, but but you're owning it not for what it's worth.
你持有它是因为它每个月带来的收入。
You're owning for what it's kicking off every month in terms of income.
只要你的收入流稳定且增长,那才是你真正关心的。
And as long as your income stream is robust and growing, that's really all you care about.
这就像福特建工厂一样,是个很好的类比。
It makes a really good analogy of like when when Ford built a factory.
他们不会太在意那个工厂建筑随时间变化的市场价值。
They don't really obsess about what the market value of that factory building is over time.
他们关心的是这个工厂生产了多少辆车。
What they obsess over is how many cars is this thing produced.
这和你说的非常相似。
And it's very much what you're talking about here.
当然,你知道,收入投资的好处是,如果你持有到期,那么中途价格怎么变就不那么重要了。
And of course, you know, the benefit of of of income investing is if you hold to maturity, you know, then it doesn't matter necessarily what happens to the price along the way.
你会拿回你应得的钱。
You're going to be made whole.
当然,如果利率涨到百分之十几并且一直维持在那里,你知道,那就有机会成本,因为你没法参与那些更高的利率。
Now, of course, if interest rates just go to into the teens and hang out there, you know, there's there's there's opportunity cost of not participating in those higher ones.
但话说回来,你还好,
But still, you're well,
这就是为什么当你构建投资组合时,我觉得很多人犯的另一个错误是,他们去买二十年期的国债。
And this is but this is why when you build a port, this is another mistake I think a lot of people make is they go out and they buy twenty year treasuries.
对,没错。
Yeah, exactly.
你知道,我就打算全买二十年期国债,然后收益率上升,他们就在亏钱。
You know, I'm just gonna go buy everything in twenty year treasuries and then the yield goes up and they're losing.
他们看到投资组合的价值下跌。
They see the value of the portfolio down.
如果你五年后需要用到这笔钱,就别买二十年期的国债。
Don't buy a twenty year treasury if you need your money in five years.
不要买
Don't buy
或者用国债阶梯来配置。
a Or treasury ladder up.
这就是为什么你实际上真的,我觉得这是个很好的观点。
And this is why you actually really, I think is a great point.
如果你不熟悉债券投资,大多数人都不熟悉,除了像我要买二十年期债券或者我要买债券基金。
If you're not familiar in investing in bonds, which most people aren't, except like I'm going to buy a twenty year bond or I'm going to buy a bond fund.
如果你不熟悉兰斯在这里讲的这些细节,找懂行的人,利用他们的专业知识。
If you're not familiar with how to the nuances of what Lance is talking about here, find somebody who does this and leverage their expertise.
让我把我们的意思说清楚。
And let me be really clear about what you and I are talking about.
我们说的不是ETF,不是债券ETF,也不是债券基金。
We are not talking about ETFs and we're not bond ETFs and we're not talking about bond funds.
这些工具是交易利率的。
Instruments are a trade on interest rates.
你只是在赌利率的走向。
You are simply trading the direction of interest rates.
所以当你买那些的时候,就跟买股票一样。
So when you buy those, that is the same thing as buying a stock.
你只是在赌利率会下降,因为那些工具永远不会按面值到期。
You're just betting on you're betting on the fact that interest rates are going to fall because those those instruments never mature at face value.
它们只是内部滚动债券。
They just roll the bonds inside.
一个债券到期了,就滚动到下一个。
One bond matures, they roll it by the next one.
所以基金就是这样,你完全是在赌利率的变动。
That's how So the funds you're solely betting on the move of interest rates.
所以如果你要买债券基金或债券ETF,你最好对利率的方向判断准确。
So if you're gonna buy a bond fund or a bond ETF, you better be right about the direction of rates.
如果你买的是真正的债券,也就是我们说的那种,我买的是真正的五年期国债、七年期国债、三年期国债、二十年期国债,那你就不用担心价格了。
If you're buying an actual bond, which is what we're talking about, I'm buying an actual five year treasury, an actual seven year treasury, an actual three year treasury, an actual twenty year treasury, then you don't worry about the price.
你担心的是我的久期。
You're worried about my duration.
我要持有多久?
How long am I going to hold?
在我需要拿回这笔钱用于退休或其他支出之前,我需要持有多久?
How long do I need it to hold it before I need my money back for retirement or whatever spending need?
比如我要买房,或者其他什么用途。
I'm going buy a house, whatever it is.
我需要五年。
I need five years.
你买一个五年期债券,到期时。
You buy a five year bond at maturity.
不管利率怎么变动,涨到天上还是跌到地板,你都能拿回100%的本金,无论如何。
Regardless of what interest rates do up, down to the moon, to the floor, you get 100% of your money back regardless.
这是需要记住的重要一点。
That's the important thing to remember.
这就像买定期存单一样。
It's just like it's the same thing as buying a CD.
我之前提到过你的房子。
I was talking about your house earlier.
你不会担心房价,因为利率上涨了,因为你要住在那里。
You don't worry about the price of your house because interest rates have gone up because you're gonna live there.
你不会买定期存单,对吧。
You don't buy a CD, right.
当你买定期存单时,你不会担心它的价格,因为定期存单每天在你的账单上都是以同样的价格显示的。
When you buy a CD, you don't worry about the price CD because the CD is always priced every day on your statement at the same price.
定期存单就是这样运作的。
That's the way CD works.
但如果你要在市场上卖掉它,那是一个5%的定期存单,而现在定期存单利率是6%,你在公开市场上卖的话就得打折。
But if you went to sell that in the market, it's a 5% CD and CD rates are now six, you're gonna take a discount selling that into the open marketplace.
但你只是看不到这种波动而已。
But you just don't see that fluctuation.
亚当,你还记得金融危机之后,有一阵子大家特别想推动货币市场基金,因为当时有个大型货币市场基金爆雷了,净值跌破了一美元。
Adam, you remember after the financial crisis, there was a whole momentary push to try to get money market funds after the big money market fund blew up and the buck.
当时有个临时性的运动,想让货币市场基金每天重新定价利率。
There was a temporary movement to try to get money market funds to reprice daily the interest rates.
但这个想法马上就被否决了,因为那样的话,人们会到处买卖货币基金,会破坏货币市场基金的平衡。
That got kiboshed immediately because people would be buying and selling money funds all over the place and would destroy the money market fund balance.
所以你看不到那些利率变化,因为这些变化被压制在这些工具里面,直到到期才报告。
So you don't see those rate changes because those rate changes are suppressed within those instruments and they're just not reported until maturity.
但债券也是同样的道理。
But that's the same thing with bonds.
当你持有债券时,你在对账单上看到的只是根据当前利率进行的重新估值。
All you're seeing on your statement when you own a bond is just the revaluation based on interest rates today.
我持有一个5%利率的债券,而今天的利率是6%。
I've got a 5% bond, 6% is the interest rate today.
如果我想今天卖掉它,我的债券价格必须下降,这样收益率才能持平。
My bond price has to go down to make if I wanted to sell it today, yields have to be equivalent.
这就是它告诉你的全部信息。
That's all that's telling you.
它不告诉你任何关于安全性的信息,也不告诉你关于到期日的信息。
It tells you nothing about the safety, tells you nothing about maturity.
买债券时你唯一需要担心的不是票面利率,因为买的时候会有溢价和折价。
And the only thing that you need to worry about when you buy a bond, don't worry about the coupon because there's premiums and discounts when you buy a bond.
票面利率对你来说毫无意义。
The coupon means nothing to you.
你唯一需要关心的是到期收益率。
Only thing you want to know about is yield to maturity.
我今天买入。
I buy it today.
我的到期收益率是X。
My yield to maturity is X.
我能接受这个到期收益率吗?
Am I okay with that yield to maturity?
关于 Bayt 播客
Bayt 提供中文+原文双语音频和字幕,帮助你打破语言障碍,轻松听懂全球优质播客。